amalahama

what a surprise I'm guessing that it's absolutely key to visit a french squadron and get lots of confidential info for making it work, right?

Please do. It should leave the same gap between bombs regardless the speed. Best regards

Ah I missed that, cool thanks!

Is this realistic? Doesn't ALR67 compensate for the elevator pitch when representing in the RWR screen?

I don't want a list. I want new 3D models I can use for making missions more exciting and interesting. Regards!

DCS needs to update the overall asset portfolio with not-that-modern-now aircraft like: - Eurofighter - F-22 - F-35 - A400M - NH90/Tiger - Super Hornet ... Cows are nice, but if they have 3D modellers idle, that would be an even better use of them. regards

Intruder is an OK choice. But Tornado... OMG the Tornado, that will become a Blockbuster from day 1!!!! So many memories from the old DI simulator, and so many interesting weapons to play around...

I would like to see radar reflecting buildings, runways, taxiways, bridges... But that would require a huge rework I guess Regards!

Unlikely, and we have already the sweden Maverick in the inventory.

Yeah this one kind of annoys me, it's the sign of something weird going on in the FM. Any dev can have a look at this? it looks like max speed is hardcoded or something

Looks great.. except the ag radar. That's not realistic at all. It looks like a moving map actually

Aaaand the weekend has come 8-) Regards!

The surprise is, they will actually finish a module and not leave it drowning in a sea of bugs!

Hi guys. The thing is that DCS maps have a pretty decent coverage overall, but the high detailed parts are really limited in extension. Honestly, today it's pretty easy to automatize basic scenery generation based on open-source vectorial info (e.g. OpenStreetMap), so I don't understand why ED doesn't add a bit more of detail (like towns, roads...), with generic buildings maybe, extending the whole scenery. Yeah flying over Las Vegas or Abu Dhabi is great with all the special scenery objects but having an extended scenary is more useful most of the time. I know this is a cry in the desert. But it's sad how limited the detailed coverage is in most of the scenaries. Regards!

THen? How can we land in the carrier in a foggy, stormy night?

On en a assez des Mirages!!. If we have to go french, why not a Jaguar or a Super Etendard?

Wow! I absolutely didn't expect that! Really looking forward to it Cobra, and thanks for the effort!

Yes please! I thought the same the other day, I'd like to print it but I'm waiting for the final version.

Did you watch how AGM-65 flies in external view? or JDAMs? they are not affected by wind, and sometimes they follow weird trajectories. Yes, LGBs and dumb bombs seem to have full 6DoF flight models, but they are the exception. Regards

I think it's been implemented for dumb and laser bombs only, but it needs to become a standard. Will we see more complex, fluid flight models for other stores as well? Currently, JDAMs, Mavericks.. all look like "flying on rails"™ regards

I like that one - FC4 being focused on high-tech candy in which lot of guesstimations need to be done. We are not going to have them modelled in full fidelity anyway, and it will become a blockbuster, I'm sure! Regards!

How was the LANTRIN controlled in this early implementation? like switching TV/IR, zoom in/out, control the laser designator etc. Because I'm assuming there was nothing specific installed in the cockpit beyond that little switch to exchange video feeds. Regards!

Ey! Those polygons from early Flanker days stand up quite well even for today's standards!

Definitively Sea Eagle is not, and hasn't been, part of the real inventory, and the fact that there is a picture of a C-101 flying with an inert example proves nothing... Regards

It would be nice to have more info from HB about exactly which -As and -Bs we are getting - and with which toys we will play. Regards!