amalahama

Eagerly waiting for RAZBAM solving this issue too. Right now, making INS updates feels like almost cheating. Regards

Relaxing something already realistic would be pretty sad.

Yep definitively in the video the FPV movement looks too brisk and the oscillation is excessive, it doesn't seem to match with the real a/c movement.

Is there any intention to fix this? It's quite annoying, towns and cities are fantastic navigation fix points Regards

It was shown not long ago a development picture of the Harrier with force vectors on it, so they should have some preliminary FM running. What I would like to see is an actual screenshot of the cockpit with the MFDs on :joystick: Re

It's been ages since the last time I flew the Kamov, but AFAIR the buses were functional somehow but don't expect anything beyond that - the electrical system as such was not modeled, just a bunch of "If...else" without physical meaning behind, ammeter and voltmeter were no functional, and battery doesn't run out. A-10C is kinda same think, first a/c with a proper modeled elec. system was the Mustang. Regards!

This, and also adding the behaviour renhanxue pointed out - not impacting precisely on BX9 but pitching down after passing BX9 and then impacting randomly with the ground after that point Regards

That one could actually be a feature - if the missile doesn't find anything it just crashes at the last pre-planned waypoint, it makes sense. Let see what's the opinion from the experts. Regards

This, and also would be nice if the shader you use in the EP-13 scales resolution accordingly - I have the feeling is too high at the moment (although I have to say that the chromatic aberration effect is awesome!) Regards!

You Swedish are weird people :D I wonder how many of these oddities are hidden in this incredible piece of technology. Regards

Yes it's annoying actually, I really hope they snap that one quickly. It also happens that wings never have wingtip vortex trails, whatever the AoA is, it seems the current engine can only handle vortex trails in either place, but not both simultaneously. Regards

Thumbs up CptSmiley, thank you :)

If real Mirage can do that, I would be really impressed... DCS 1.5.6 Open Beta, Mach 1.01 at Sea level (well 350 ft...), 2 Magics and 2800 Kg fuel. MIL Thrust only Regards P.S -> Fighters able to supercruise, they do it between 20.000 and 30.000 ft, where air density and hence, drag is low enough. At sea level, there are even few fighters capable to actually go supersonic with AB on.

Gentleman, you just won internet today :megalol: and actually nailed the main point , so everybody should have a clear view of what's being discussed in this post Sorry renhanxue I quoted your comment on mistake as I intended to respond to bones :) anyway great tips there which thanks to my mistake won't be unnoticed :thumbup: Regards

That's true for the radar altimeter, but it's not for radar-ranging. I totally align with some1, with a/c attitude and radar azimuth-elevation-range data, you can absolutely locate the target point in reference to your position, QFE data is redundant and actually, less accurate than the rest. Regards

Thank you John, I totally love your tutorials, especially that you don't limit yourself to just go through the manual while flying, but you get deeper on the subjects and provide valuable information to understand how and why procedures are the way they are. Keep the good work! Regards!

Thank you Cobra! The best way to go, now I can sleep soundly tonight Regards

But it should be a bug, since the real a/c didn't have that possibility...

Well, it still break the sonic barrier at 2500 ft without afterburner, so I guess it needs more tuning... Regards

Hi, Does CK37 display use Nixie technology like this? Or VFD like old calculators? Regards!

I'm pretty sure you can "simulate" a Recce mission using some clever Mission Editor tricks, no need for a full module for that Regards!

The only other Viggen variant that I think it would be worth to develop is the JA. It's different enough as to justify its acquisition in a different package. And I'm in love with the green phosphorus MFDs from the eighties! Regards!

Yep, exactly what I meant. Current SAM IA is limited and acts awkward sometimes (like shooting at you like no tomorrow), there is plenty of improvement room here. I agree with your post, we need more old-school SAMs (not only SA-2! but the complete under-ten SA family) and the never out of fashion flak! Regards!

Yep, we need more and better SAM units. My bet is that after Normandy is out we might start seeing developments in this direction. Regards!

Actually, an Android app with both panels would be fantastic. Regards!