amalahama

Sorry, but exactly how is synthetic runways enabled in the real aircraft? Is the runway information introduced in the INS? or it's automatically built from ILS signals? Regards!

What about the unrealistic behavior of the SPO-10? The ASP providing bombing solutions with the radar-off? Simplified navigation with an unrealistically modeled ARK-9/10? No real ground returns when radar pointing downwards? Small nuances as well? Of course there are different levels of realism, each of them valid for different kind of public. But as Vicent says, don't try to sell the product as an "study sim" then, it's misleading and directly false. Regards

Well it's not only about locating town/cities, but also to locate buildings around a runway for targeting, for example, or so others many uses that a 70's tech AG radar can have in "terra firma". I hope they eventually find out, it has tactical relevance. Regards

Honestly as I see this, if they declare and go for an early A version and all features are realistic within this context, then FINE. What I hate is when several versions are mixed together with "playability concessions" and undeveloped features. But it's not the case this time. Yep that's a pity. Some people buys the Mirage 2000 and would have preferred the mud moving -5, so what? They are transparent with the version they are modeling and delivers what's promised, fair game. Regards

Question, did the A-7 suffer the same painful engine problems as the F-14A, since they both share power plant? Regards

Cobra has spoken! :) Regards

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3085567&postcount=16 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3086812&postcount=20 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=142375 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2691071&postcount=22 etc, etc... Regards

Honestly I don't understand why people keep saying that the Mig-21 is one of the most realistic a/c in DCS, when right now it's flawed in almost every area, from FM to weapon system, from Navigation to Starcode activation. It's a fun aircraft to fly, but I really hope M3 straighten it up and bring the realism level it deserves Regards

My heart beat rate skyrocketed at reading "Mig-29 AFM" in the title. Please be more careful naming your posts. Heart health is not joke. Regards

I do. Charging for the upgrade, of course :music_whistling: Regards

Really? I don't have NTTR installed, but I've been told that it's not the case, buildings are still missing from radar scope. It can happen though that what you see is the terrain-type change under towns or cities, but not the buildings themselves. Regards

Just checking, are there plans to make them visible in the radar scope at some point down the road? Yeah, I know the Viggen is not an interdiction a/c, but since it's the only sensor installed, being unable to at least detect town and cities is quite annoying. Regards!

Well the image needs to be half transparent, but it's an start! Regards

Who knows, but don't expect it soon. Regards

Good catch! Regards

Sorry for destroying wet dreams here, but I think Chizh statement is only Flight Model related. Regards

It's a real M2000C wishlist actually , so I guess they should write on Dassault's forums instead. Regards

Ey, this is actually a cool request. I don't know why it's denied so often this small but very important detail, a workable stopwatch, that allows for proper MP and SP timing. I hope you get to implement it at some point in the future, definitively an useful feature and not that hard to implement. Regards!

Relaxing something already realistic would be pretty sad.

Yep definitively in the video the FPV movement looks too brisk and the oscillation is excessive, it doesn't seem to match with the real a/c movement.

Is there any intention to fix this? It's quite annoying, towns and cities are fantastic navigation fix points Regards

It was shown not long ago a development picture of the Harrier with force vectors on it, so they should have some preliminary FM running. What I would like to see is an actual screenshot of the cockpit with the MFDs on :joystick: Re

It's been ages since the last time I flew the Kamov, but AFAIR the buses were functional somehow but don't expect anything beyond that - the electrical system as such was not modeled, just a bunch of "If...else" without physical meaning behind, ammeter and voltmeter were no functional, and battery doesn't run out. A-10C is kinda same think, first a/c with a proper modeled elec. system was the Mustang. Regards!

This, and also adding the behaviour renhanxue pointed out - not impacting precisely on BX9 but pitching down after passing BX9 and then impacting randomly with the ground after that point Regards

That one could actually be a feature - if the missile doesn't find anything it just crashes at the last pre-planned waypoint, it makes sense. Let see what's the opinion from the experts. Regards