Texac

I'm certainly sure, facebook can't handle such quality content.

Take a look at Wags' signature, it was recorded at a constant 60 FPS. The video will be uploaded to YouTube later this day.

Verstehe ich das so richtig, dass man sich noch erst entscheiden muss in welche Simulation das 3d model dieses Helikopters integriert wird und bleibt es nur bei dem external model? Bzw. was ist mit einer potenziellen anderen Simulation gemeint, ein anderer Flugsimulator und nicht DCS?

I've never seen the trees leaves waving as soon as you turn on wind. Or does someone remember having seen that before 2.2?

The new damage models will probably first appear for WW2 aircraft. Then the new damage model will continue to be integrated one by one, I guess, into the sim for each unit. However don't expect these to come with 2.5, there has been no specific date on when these new damage models might be available for us. For an official update on the state of the damage model view this thread: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=194540

I've just a read a comment with the completely opposite opinion. I don't know how these new sounds don't amaze you but I also gotta agree that the new sounds are really an improvement, a long awaited improvement!

Ich glaube dahinter liegt eine andere Logik. Die neuen Effekte tauchen für Bomben, Raketen oder bei der Explosion eines Fahrzeuges auf, manchmal aber auch nicht und die alten sind zu sehen. Teilweise waren auch beide Explosionen auf einmal zu sehen.

A new damage model is in work and is being tested AFAIK. However it will take time to implement the damage model for each air and ground unit.

Yes, new sounds were implemented for many aircraft with the latest updates to both versions.

Very basic and up to date skin tutorial made by Chris Sloanes.

Some effects have been added to the static objects. So far I'm enjoying the update a lot with all the new and improved stuff!

Others that constantly bash developers due to their announcement strategy aren't representing the whole DCS World community on the media. I don't know if you're reading between the lines but there are also many people liking the idea and their choice while others need to react like wild animals.

Es kommt, meiner Erfahrung nach, für viele Leute aber auch nicht immer auf das Modul an sich an, sondern auch an den Entwickler welcher sich hier seine Karten verspielt wenn ich mir die Reaktion anschaue.

Und so wie die Community reagiert sieht es wohl auch so aus, dass es ihnen nicht leicht fallen wird das Interesse ihrer Kunden (bzw. der DCS World Community) für weitere WW2 Projekte zu erwecken.

Wolken sind auch mit drin. Außerdem scheint es mir so, dass sich das Lightning noch einmal deutlich verändert hat und Luft- und Bodenfahrzeuge optisch mit dem PBR besser zurecht kommen.

Glaube ich auch nicht. Von einer MiG-21 zu einem Doppeldecker?

Perhaps that might explain why Leatherneck split up, if that really is not a joke or a troll? :D

Also I think the lightning has been updated in conjunction with the aircraft. They look different, much realistic now. For example the engine metal parts on the F-15C are now reflecting.

Not all servers are receiving the update at the same time. Forcing the update via Skate's Updater Utility works fine for me. My 2.1 version was up to date.

Regarding perfomance issues when having MSAA or AA activated with Deferred Shading. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3317180&postcount=583

Today, a few hours left. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3313664&postcount=514

Perhaps there is a possibilty for RAZBAM to implement the (AI) AV-8B Harrier II + version now? Or is the A/G radar still in need for that and how much of a work would the development of the 3d model require?

The arrestor cables on the runways aren't used to practice landings according to the checklist. They are used for emergencies AFAIK. But I would like to see them implemented some day soon as well.