TheGhostOfDefi

@Raptor9 Well im sorry for the misunderstanding of my side. Seems that the explanation else where went passed by me. For the simple user it showed similar symptoms as if the radar would’ve been misplaced.

I Checked and since the last update (30th October ´24) the FCR sends its signal out where it actually is. Before it was scaning from the position of the TADS. So now you can utilize the Apache Radar in a Hull-Down position.

@Dragan I think those are there for years if not over a decade. Its because the A-10 references show it. But we dont have those weapons ingame nor would i expect them.

Would be Great

Wrong place mate, try here: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1237-bugs-problems/

Try UHF.

The new Trollocopter Falcon is not Trackable by TGP (Apache TADS) and does not return Laser ranging.

Und den Tanker hast du derweil auch nicht verändert? (Weil wegen MPRS kann nicht über Boom betanken)

Remember the swerving when activating auto pilot to hover? Yeah it’s gone… Overall the SCAS behaves different. Slightly but very comforting different. I know “Nothing was changed” but something changed… When comparing how often SCAS would take control of the tail rotor in sometimes even ridiculous manner to now: It calmed down and now provides a smoother run. Maybe some Core elements were changed by or for the 47 that unexpectingly changed things for the Apache as well?

Those types that stick out are longer overall, so yeah that’s correct. The 229er have almost twice the warhead weight but are same in diameter so to add more stuff they need to get longer.

Maybe for Starters run a repair..

Got new CM dispenser as well.

I dont see it as a major problem. Just a Problem for making those scenarios. Or doing that is more complicated. (And you can have 3 factions just that one of them is not Fighting if i remember correctly) And just so nobody gets me wrong: Im for just one Afghanistan faction. Taliban etc can be represented by the already ingame insurgent faction. I mean, we rather have the problem of missing assetes to portray them in the first place..

If ANA and ANP get own factions the USMC and ARMY would need too… And the Russian VDV and GRU for sure. I think one Afghanistan would do the trick.

Haben wohl mehrere gehabt durch das Update. Unveränderte Belegung nur das funzt nicht mehr…

I like the creative nature of the water.

It’s just the Display for your radar and laser warning receiver. Basically you ASE page integrated into the TSD.

You need to use the Slot Airboss and not just take a look there. Then you can command the carrier! See here:

So even if this isn’t the exact right spot to bring this up but: We need way more ground assets in general. Yet since we have Afghanistan we need the bread and butter of ISAF units, MRAPs. Some of each nation for example The Oshkosh M-ATV used by multiple nations, regular and special forces. The Cougar, used as well by multiple nations in 4x4 and 6x6 configurations Further we have the Dingo, used primarily by the Germans but still used by multiple nations The Buffalo MRAP is a special one since it’s used to clear mines and IEDs Used by primarily the Marine Corps the RG-33 And that’s just a selection of a few. And even if not directly fighting vehicles it would almost make more sense to bring more support vehicles in game, since they often got pinned down while clearing roads or rescuing man and vehicles. At all we need vehicles for our scenarios of supporting ground forces and not watching them doing the job all alone. I think of vehicles like the Husky mine clearing vehicle Or a wrecker used by canada and germany Or just new trucks used in these theatres (not that we would need any new in general) like the HEMTT Or Afghan national army and police vehicles And to close my case, clearly a timeless classic the uparmored HMMWV those are just examples there are many more but I think I made my point. With best regards cheers

Die you use the manual Stab instead or at all?

Yes. In the Picture its german but you get the idea.

Because its an unique slot.

@Raptor9 Quick sidequestion is the LMC we have right now in its final state or still Wip?

You did select the TADS as sight right? Otherwise please clearify what is your intend and what you do mean exactly by focus? Edit if you want to stabilize to the ground use LMC AND Laser Rangefinder!

And dont forget that the Target State estimator can work against you! Hold your target persistent in your crosshairs.