Jump to content

Fusedspine33

Members
  • Posts

    559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Fusedspine33

  1. The best thing about this is you can make it whatever angle you want. Unless you have a metal shop at your disposal working with MDF is going to force you into some compromises. I got the 54 degree from dogfight boss. His pit is pretty accurate and the angle worked well for me and pointed the vertical panel toward my seat in a natural/ergonomic way. Your seat angles will play into the overall interface as well, not sure if fusion takes that into account as you view your model. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  2. Hope this helps visualize. Wish there was a way to type the text in markup. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  3. 10 degrees horizontal, 30 degrees intersect between horizontal and vertical panels, 54 degrees for vertical panels. 10 degree lean for the front dash. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  4. Capt Zeen F/A-18C Beta Helios Profile ! ! ! Tapatalk
  5. This tutorial covers setup and curves. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  6. Well said Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  7. These two mechanisms provide a project within a project to simulate. Would like to get a parking brake on/off and emergency brake on/off that would work with a on/off/on toggle switch without needing the push pull commands. The same for the wing fold mechanism just the ability to spread/hold/fold using a rotary switch. Thanks. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
      • 1
      • Like
  8. DCS World Patch Notes Discussion Thread Bignewy, From user reports has ED noticed any trends in user hardware or installed software that contributes to the varying results. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  9. It’s about how it’s perceived, not how it is done. Priorities that many want first is functionality over eye-candy. The key binds were committed to being implemented by Razbam long ago. While still waiting for those a new cockpit and pilot body has been implemented. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  10. Matrix are a PITA, spend $15 for this add on. http://www.leobodnar.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=94&products_id=274 Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  11. 32 inputs via a matrix using the BU0836A Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  12. Translated for English forum I noticed that in Harrier’s DCS beta 2.5.6, the nose wheel does not visually turn when taking off from aircraft carriers, although the plane itself does. There is no such thing on the fields. In the ordinary version, too, all the rules. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  13. 77 posts detailing missing features, long standing bugs, promised keybinds poor documentation and Decoy, the Razbam community manager, has yet to bring any current light to the issues raised. These failures pretty much sum up my interpretation of Razbams commitment to fixing and finishing the module. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  14. @Neo The Virpil 200mm is very much like the A-10 pictured. 59 euros. @Ranma compared to the Virpil it’s about the same cost per CM, LOL. It works well with a Warbird base on the floor for helicopter flying. Very light stick forces.
  15. Not sure if you have seen these. They are pretty amazing for VR flying. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=218861 Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  16. Have heard about this one infrequently being used. Does it also require you to program a sketch? Once created is each real button/switch position assignable across modules in DCS or other games? If you have more than one can you keep windows from scrambling input assignments. I am always trying to learn other options. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  17. Alternatives to using an endless amount of Leo Bodnar boards? Hi, The Bodnar boards are more expensive than Arduino but they allow you to use them for more than one module and game. They also have individual serial numbers so Windows won’t scramble the inputs when you reboot the PC. The BU0836X boards are the most expensive and I only bought enough to meet my needs for potentiometers. The BBI-64 is cheaper and handles rotaries, encoders, push buttons and toggles. The BBI-64 works well in DCS but not in a well known space sim, also with the initials of ED, as Windows does not recognize more than 32 inputs. In that case multiple BBI-32 cards might guide your purchasing. Arduino with DCSBios is cheaper but at present limits you to a single airframe. It is the old adage “Cheap, Fast, Good, but you can only pick two”. In the end I only need to buy Bodnar once and they meet meet my needs across multiple modules and games. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  18. Seems like the SRS conflict is ringing a bell from a thread I read on the forums. Try putting SRS first in the export lua. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  19. Chuck’s guide on Mudspike? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  20. Try changing the cams and springs and look for anything obviously wrong. Broken items, springs slipped from placement during shipment, mismatched spring weights, mismatched cam profiles. If not you waited too long and paid too much to have a broken device. They should swap yours out for a new unit. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  21. I know they are a bigger PITA than Android. Does this require a jail broken android device? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  22. DCS UFC ( Android app ) Any chance for an iOS version. This would be great on an iPad mini. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  23. Pics are missing Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  24. +1 to the Leo Bodnar cards. Each card is recognized in windows with a unique serial number. This prevents windows from mistaking box 1 for box 3 or box 2. They are a little more expensive but in this case they are worth it. No potentiometers use BBI 32 or 64 Yes potentiometers use BU0836 series card. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  25. Capt. Zeen and/or all community experts, First, All of your work is amazing, thanks for all you do! I am trying to make an F-18 custom interface with the four back up instruments and the RWR in the lower right of my screen that will be mounted behind a physical dash overlay. I was able to place most of them from the toolbox. But have run into two issues: The F-18 VVI by default has an oversized perimeter box around it that affects the placement needed. I need to place it between the edge of the image and the edge of the perimeter box. When trying to edit these items in paint I get warnings about a loss of function/transparency and do not understand how to restore functionality. Would it be possible to have a resized VVI added to the toolbox? There is no F-18 RWR in the toolbox library. I was hoping to have the etched glass transparency in the profile. Attempting a cut and paste in paint also results in those loss of functionality/transparency warnings. I tried using the A-10 RWR and that resulted in the previously viewable RWR viewport (edited RWR.lua) displayed as a pile of giant pixels. Any idea why the RWR overlay would scramble the viewport? Does the overlay eliminate the need for editing the RWR.lua? Would it be possible to have an F-18 RWR added to the toolbox? Thanks in advance for any help from all. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...