Repth

The Gazelle issue sounds like a coalition problem. The USA coalition may not have all of the variants of the Gazelle available to it. Try switching that to France and then see if the other options show up for you.

A couple of things could be preventing the ILS from not working in the aircraft: The frequency is wrong for the runway you are landing on The ILS for the runway may not be activated due to a bug with wind in the sim right now. you may not be landing in the right direction for the runway you are using. You can check the the appropriate information on the chart in knee pad. Hopefully that will help you troubleshoot the issue. If not can you provide us a track file so we can take a look? Edit: Looking at your screen shot there are also a number of flags in your HSI indicating that it is not working correctly. Do you have the correct mode selected in the HSI? Did you take any damage during your flight?

Hi Kd0321, Welcome to the forums! The additional skins are being worked on but, have not been included with the aircraft yet. If you go to the user files section of the ED website, you should find an excellent selection of user created skins from many of the talented artists in the community. That will hopefully help fill the gap while the ED artists do their thing. If you need help installing the user created skins feel free to ask. As far as the updates; are you running the open beta or stable version of DCS? If the former, an update should be available. If the latter, then you will have to wait for the next stable branch update to see the changes.

Hi Pmedic. If you start from the ground in those missions you can change the skin using the arm/rearm menu. If you start from the air you will have to manually edit the mission to set that skin for the plane. Unfortunately there is no setting in the sim that I know of that allows you to set a default skin. Hope that helps.

We look forward to meeting you all out there. We are currently recruiting for all air frames; F-18, F-14(pilots and rio's), Harrier, and Huey.

@ Xilon_X That is because the map was developed and designed around the 1944 invasion of Normandy and not the Battle of Britain. Italy at that point was pretty much out of the war. However, I don't think anyone would be opposed to more Italian WWII aircraft if the proper documentation could be found and the theatre was expanded upon. I agree with the Pacific theatre request. Would like to see a Solomon Isles Map and the inclusion of the P-38 on that list and the resurrection of the P-40 now that VEAO is gone.

Current G is located on the HUD here (red circle). Hope that helps!

Good ol' Bobby Mac tried the commonality approach back in the 60's and it ended up not working out too well. It wasn't a total failure though, we got the F-14 out of that deal. Since then, the individual branches of the military have been responsible for procuring their own weapons for the most part.

Pressing cancel at the beginning of the torrent will allow for an alternate download format. (HTTP I Believe). Maybe that will work for you?

DMS down long (2 seconds) turns the HMCS on/off in the Viper. If it happens again try that and see if it turns on again.

Known bug, they currently do not work right now. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4055644&postcount=1

I hope you are right. According to Wags we won't have that capability in the cockpit of the aircraft. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4048457&postcount=12 Item 3.

Typically the code for the LGB's are set in the mission editor by the creator. The default code for all aircraft is normally 1688 (unless something has changed recently). Hopefully the mission designers will create unique codes for all aircraft, but I wouldn't expect that day one.

:D

Oh I'm well aware, Tokyo, Seoul, and Pyongyang alone would bring any current PC to it's knees..... but they pulled off Dubai. A guy can dream :). It covers most of the "modern" aircraft though. China, Russia, Japan/South Korea/U.S. would be useful for the upcoming F-4E (I know the Japanese flew the F-4J) and the F-16.

Would love a Sea of Japan map

That is a wonderful idea lunatic. Mrs. Chief, If you decide to go that route I would recommend contacting the Commemorative Air Force out at Williams Field here in AZ, They may be interested in the idea. Feel free to PM me as well if you need extra help. I may be able to find a few people interested in the equipment and willing to help you recoup some of the cost. Sorry to hear of your husband's condition, a fellow coworker of mine suffered from a brain tumor as well and I understand a little of what you're going through. My thoughts are with you, your husband, and family.

I'm not sure how feasible this would be but I think it would be a neat feature to allow the carrier module to have multiple ready rooms. I'm sure it would be popular with a majority of the larger online groups. Maybe further along in the development cycle during or after early access.

Honestly I could care less how people use the program. To you and others it's a game. To some it's a simulator. I prefer to use it as a Simulator, but that doesn't mean that I don't like to hop online and from time to time enjoy the pvp aspect of it. Most of the community that refer to or use the term "Air quake" site these reason's to not implement options for quick alignments, unrealistic load outs, etc. Both sides of the argument have merit. Use the program how you want.

Yes you will need to buy another license and tie that to a new account. You will also need to buy each terrain that you plan on flying in for the second account as well.

Yep :D

You guys are actually discussing an aspect of "Air Quake" right now believe it or not. They very thing that this whole discussion represents is the ability to get in the air instantly without having to prep the plane (minus starting the engines) after or before "death or startup" and therefore, not needing to worry about the consequences of being shot down. This is similar to the re-spawn system in most first person shooters out there today. The 104th (just an example, not harping on the 104th here at all) is notorious for it's constant pvp/battle royale style A/A match ups hence the "Quake" reference. It just takes place in the air. Many find it fun, others don't. It will be constantly debated until the sim finds a good balance between the two. I'm not saying it's good or bad either way. That is just about the multiplayer portion of the community. I understand the need for those who have limited time to want to get in the air quickly due to lack of time or prior commitments. I also understand the want for realism in what is advertised as a Simulation. The reason so many people differ in this opinion comes down to whether or not they believe the developer should put resources into an option they will never use vs those that think the developer should do it and would use the option regularly.

The Mig 23 is available as an AI unit but, if that was indeed Razbam's 23, then exciting times are ahead for sure :)

Thanks Cobra! :thumbup:

The request box for MP shows up near the chat box for me (VR) so it isn't in the way while flying, I'm not sure if it's different using a monitor. Edit: Sniped