Jester986

Thats weird, haven't experienced that with any multicrew module.

Two Cat's with talds, two Hornets with harms, one SA-10 battery with TOR protection... Who will win?

They said on discord it will have no back seat AI because the pilot can handle everything from the front seat. They have said it will be open to human wso's though.

It's a lot of fun to fly with the VTOL, but I cant give it a recommendation in its current state. It can be hard to figure out whats user error, a bug, or not implemented yet. The mirage is a lot of fun and has some air to ground capabilities but is mostly air to air. If you want air to ground the A-10C is the gold standard. It can be intimidating to learn but doing the training missions will get you close enough and finding a squadron to fly with online thats willing to help you learn will get you the rest of the way. Viggen is also a lot of fun for strike missions but its a get in and get out plane, not for loitering over the target plinking tanks.

Seriously?

Also getting online with some people who like to helping out is great way to learn. Browse some of the squadrons and see if any might help you out.

I hear there's rubber dog shit that needs to find it's way out of Hong Kong too.

Agreed. Unless Heatblur would rather I wait and pay full price, because it's worth it :thumbup:

I put the wing sweep to bomb and didn't have too much of an issue. Initially matching speed was difficult because of turbine lag I think. Could be wrong on that though. I'm now expert but found it to be a little tougher than the hornet and mirage because of less hud info but easier than the Harrier. Be patient and keep practicing.

Now that the 14 is out this is my number one hype bird.

What happened to that skin chaser? I haven't seen it on user files.

It is more than I had hoped it would be! Congratulations and thank you. I hope we get to see more modules from your team.

I know the FD bars on the ADI work great on an ILS, not sure about the rest of your question.

I wrote up something sarcastic about you correcting me but fact is legacy means something different to different sectors of aviation. In the military it means one thing, in firefighting and utility aviation, where I work, it means something completely different. You're right though it's a military aircraft so I should use that definition. Thanks for setting me straight. Hey look I still got some sarcasm in there, oops.

I was referring to this section as far as aggressiveness, and I didn't mean to be critical but you catch more flies with honey than vinegar. Your saying answer me or I'll assume the worst. From what I've seen they ignore statements like that, because if they were to answer it only encourages others. And I wasn;t saying you should be on discord, just letting you know what they have said there. :thumbup:

Viper although I share you're frustration such aggressiveness is not going to make them forth coming. They have said on their discord though that "Tobbe" is their dedicated Harrier debugger.

I'm the type of person that really likes legacy aircraft. Give me some steam gauges, an ADF, hold the MFD's, and I'll go do an instrument approach. But I have to say this module is so good I find it frustrating! How can I justify my love of 60's tech when this thing is around? What I mean to say though is thank you ED and great job so far. It continues to improve and at a steady pace and isn't too buggy. I look forward to seeing the rest of its systems and weapons come online.

Yes, the ASL is broken, but that's never prevented me from putting four GBU-12s down the TC hatches of four tanks. Where was I smug? Just because I don't have problems using the ASL line doesn't mean that hundreds of other Harrier pilots don't as well. (I jester986 messed up the qoute here. It was nealius)

The people saying "yea asl is bugged but its fine anyway" No. Thas not an acceptable answer. It should work correctly. I'm not here for a hodge podge of systems that kinda work but you cant tell whats user error wip or bug. I know I know early access. Well I expected more out of early access. More progress, more roadmap, more systems that get implemented stay working. I've learned my lesson. I'm parking the Harrier and I'll check back in on it in a few months. Razbam, I know you're frustrated with customer complaints. Some are completely uncalled for. But I'm normally defensive of you guys and getting to the "oh well I guess I write it off" point. I regret buying the mig now not because of it's issues, but coding IS happening on the mig that could be going into the Harrier.

Since this is one of my wishlist aircraft I'll buy atleast two of them at full price to be supportive. (provided the quality is there)

The way I read the new letter its use it or lose it by a time TBD in 2019. If I lose them I'm not going to grab my pitchfork, but I think a 1 to 2 conversion would be fair since the new system is so much less restrictive.

Dear ED, I like the direction of the new bonus system being less restrictive as I did not have many opportunities to spend my previous points. It would be disappointing to lose those though and I think a conversion of $1 in the new system for every $2 we have in the old would be fair and a nice gesture. Otherwise it will be unlikely I have the chance to spend my current 12 dollars.

Haha!

And how can Razbam expect us to buy the air to ground F-15 when so many Harrier systems are not correct? The F-15E will be even more complex and difficult to make.

What about the A-4 shown? Was that AI, a cameo to the guys who made the mod, or a future module?