draconus

Если только вы не видите забор. Также много мерцания пикселей. Лучшего АА нет. Это субъективно, у всех есть плюсы и минусы.

You missed the tbd - to be decided. They're not sure yet.

Yeah, you got me there. I can live with B liveries on our A. Or maybe they'll think about some easy way to simulate B.

Sinai holds a record of 12 months.

Only on 4ya?

They waited with nothing while you played for months already.

You want to actually hit something and land safely after?

Yep and let's not forget US aggressors They'd have to add it to some CA radar screens with some terrain/map details. Voice communication - intercept lead by AI would be priority though.

When do you plan roadmap newsletters?

I see them every mission very close on the carrier deck, or the apron, then in flight in formation. Some helis land on the ships and close to other assets at FARPS. We also have CA, drivable units. There's no going back in fidelity, it's 2025. But I agree we don't need multiple variants of every unit (for now) if some important others are missing entirely.

Make a new thread and upload your dcs.log from \saved games\dcs\logs.

Mods? FFB setting off?

I cannot reproduce the noise in SP and cannot use VC in SP either. Maybe it's all just MP thing. Then I tried F-15E and there is noise or other sound on many beacons. That's normal.

Doesn't it work with the new selection tool?

Already possible with free trials - they can play any module, try all vehicles in CA on any map, except a few most recent ones.

8 dollars? That's what single FC aircraft is on sale. But if you think clickable cockpit is the only difference between FC and FF you're clearly not the target for the product they'll make. Easy to laugh it out when it's not you who take a risk, huh? Would you like to discuss it with the Hutts?

Most needed are the Soviet/Russian, Germany/DDR, Poland (these were already shown afaik), Iraq, Iran, Syria, Ukraine. Accuracy and realism is more important than "coolness" of the livery imho.

Full walkaround is like 1-5 mins. That's searching for basic visual damage. Any holes practically need maintenance check, which means no flying today, otherwise it's very risky to startup again. My vote for walkaround feature first, which we do ourselves, then maybe ground crew report available after 1-5mins wait time (this is some average time, might need more) depending on aircraft. Another vote for a wingman task - visual check during a flight.

How silent is this when they report the work every year for you? Wags answered about Vulkan like 5 days ago: No, it couldn't. The roadmap is probably just around the corner.

Why not make a hard limiter for the forward movement?

Of course there are many beacons but do they all play noise sound? Is this a new feature? You know that FC aircraft can hear all transmissions or has this changed with the new radio mode?

You can go to your attachments list and delete the old ones.

Ju-87, Il-2 - Europe WW2 F6F, F4U, SBD, A6M, B5N - PTO WW2 A-7, A-6/EA-6B/KA-6 - USN CW MiG-29K, Su-35S, Su-57, B737, C150 - modern

I don't agree. In your situation - going head on - time from 30-35nm to 25-30nm is just a few seconds. RIO also needs a few seconds to push the IFF button, designate the target and mark it as hostile.

From F-35 FAQ: