erniedaoage

2 more weeks and the mig19 will arrive and blue will be outnumbered for the next couple of weeks till the f14 drops and everybody is flying it. :)

Maybe try re-calibrating the device with a different sensitivity setting. But haven't used mine in a while since i switched to trackhat pro.

Yeah seems like its working as it's supposed to. Good Job Alpenwolf!! Thanks for your efforts!

Tried again and i can't see and connect to the server. When i connect to the srs server, i can see and connect to the game server. When connected i get a message from SRS which says another server is being advertised on 127.0.0.1:5002 :) Maybe DCS can't see the server because there is no specific port in the first place and when SRS is connected, DCS starts to see it as a server on the next available port. SRS is usually around 5000 and DCS on 10300. But its just a wild guess from me.

+1 I can also confirm this, server doesn't show up until i connect through srs first. After srs is connected the server shows up in my list. Could it be that it's like that, because there are no specific ports set for dcs and srs? Like 193.70.81.86:10300 and 193.70.81.86:5002 or something like that?

hm seems to be working for me now.

Yeah i can't see the server anymore but i can connect to srs!

Now everything's working on my end! Thank you! :thumbup::joystick:

Still nothing on my end, not able to connect to srs nor the server, neither do i see it in my ingame browser.

Run a repair first and try it again i had some button issues also couple of weeks ago but only with the f5. Dcs repair fixed my problem.

On a site note i also cannot connect to the srs server.

Still not visible in the ingame server browser and connect to ip doesn't work.

Got the same problem yesterday evening i couldn't see it and direct connect was also not able to get through. I looked right now and i can't see it in the server listing or ingame and direct connect was also not working.

Thanks for this awesome work! I bet for a couple of people a new simpit challenge started with those shots. :) Oh and in my case, thanks jester for taking care of everything back there!

Don't give up Jarhead0331, everything gets better in 2 weeks!!!!!

43" but its a compromise setup right now. I moved a couple of months ago to a new flat and i have to built a lot of stuff myself and didn't have much spare time in those 3 months to do anything. So our TV became also my main screen. But i am sitting like 1m away from it when i fly and i don't use a real fov with this setup. My last setup was built for simracing with a 24" triple screen setup and a real fov. With the jetseat, a ffb wheel and trackir it's unbelieveable immersive. Yeah for me it's the same. Visual identification is something i really enjoy. Also with the jet fighters when they don't have a proper radar with iff.

Another wish when we talk about the controls. Please could you make the bogey dope call bindable to a joystick button. So far the mig-21 is the only bird i can directly bind the Bogey Dope call to a button, every other plane i have to use Lwin+O. It's really annoying to reach out for the keyboard when you look for the target or close to a dogfight. Thank you!

http://www.projectimmersion.com/fov/ this is for simracing but it still works also with flightsims. If you use dcs as it is the fov between the most modules is around 80-90° if you play on a 24" screen, where you sit 51cm away from it you would get a fov of 33°. You can zoom till 20° on default so which would mean you would be nearly zoomed in. If you stay 51 cm away from your screen you would need a screen with 75" that it would look real with a fov of 85° which is nearly the default value for all other planes. So you are not cheating because you are zooming in, you are always zoomed out. But if you wouldn't be zoomed out and you would have to play on a 24" screen you would only get a fov of 33° which is pretty useless if you have to fly and look at gauges. Its a compromise. For the spotting i also think that there needs to be an improvement that everybody with every resolution is able to spot the same things on the same detail level. I am using a 4k tv since a couple of months and its fabulous because i can switch off antialiasing completely and it looks still awesome, but spotting something became quite hard since iam not able anymore to see a single pixel moving against the sky. was a different story on my 1080 24". With the labels there is a chance to see something. And at your target chasing story thats how its gonna be in real life too i think. I mean you are flying with speeds around 350 - 500 kmh. If the guy in front of you moves quickly he's gone because of the speed. It's kinda like driving a formula one car down the start/finish straight and watching for the marker which says 50m and do a hard braking maneuver to get the turn done. It happens so fast and those guys not reaching 400kmh even. And if you would have a 75" screen where you don't have to zoom in to see the guy in front of you clearly it would be much easier because you have a 1:1 ratio like in real life.

zooming has nothing to do with using artificial binoculars. Read about field of view in video games and how to setup a correct fov for your airplane. VR users don't have that problem since they are already in the right place with their virutal ingame head while almost every user with a monitor has to compensate between seeing where he needs to fly, watching some gauges and dials and spotting something which would actually be bigger. If you wouldn't allow zooming dcs would have a recommendations of about a 55" screen or bigger, because you wouldn't see shit on a 27" screen or smaller. If you don't understand what i mean, take a picture frame with the size of your actual monitor and get into your car hold it at the same distance like your monitor and try to understand why there is a need of manipulating the field of view on the fly.

yes its possible i did it myself couple years ago with the same pedals, but i didn't enjoy it since i had a smaller travel range on my clutch and a much stiffer spring. And i had it setup like your picture so it was bit weird with the feel of the different pedals and travel range.

Since there is no mig-19 release so far and i got every other module i'm interested in, i will also happily donate to the server!

I am using a thrustmaster t-16000 set. I had an Saitek cyborg and one x-52 and if you compare it to the "cheap" thrustmaster set, the built quality is so much different. I mean all of them are made out of plastic, but the material difference is huge in my opinion. The TWCS set feels just right for 140 bucks, i paid less because my x52 died and i needed a replacement as soon as possible and ordered a used set for 115€. Still don't regret it best bang for your buck in this price range. If you want to invest in the future i would order a VKB or Virpil stick instead of the warthog, since the build quality of everything seems better on all reviews. But you won't get a set of VKB or Virpil Hotas for the same price as a warthog, thats for sure! And if you are into the A10 than its the best choice i think since all important buttons are on your hotas already.

Hey Alpenwolf can you please allow the player data export again. I really miss flying on your server. Thanks in advance!

Hi Alpenwolf thanks for setting up the player export! But its disabled again and jetseat is not working anymore. Did it reset with the merge of the open beta and the stable version? Thanks for all your work the missions are great and the rear aspect only setting is really interesting!!