AeriaGloria

The aero manual says the controls have good authority even below 200 kmh. The engines do have a high thrust in idle It should sustain AB climb at peak climb speed (Mach 0.9-0.95) up to 50,000 feet, and still climb higher as long as speed is higher It should buffet around 15 degrees, you can feel it with FFB. I think you will find that DCS F-18 still out turns it in every way.

The specific wording of the Su-27 manual is this sentence “When the RLPK and LOO6 operate simultaneously, false information may be displayed on the L006LM indicator (displaying bearing marks 10, 30, 50, 90 from the left and right, type X, power gradation up to 8, marks B, NI CAPTURE).” Emphasis on the word “may.” Other translators will translate it as “it is possible for false information to be displayed.” Far from conclusive “this happens 100% of the time”

If this 9.12B document is an issue, I suggest you remove the upload from your server. Being on ED user files makes it seem 100% approved

The video at the start of the thread is my video. And half the comments about how I sound bad lol, not my mic but like my actual normal voice

I like this for one reason, I think it will make cranking and rolling to reverse the crank while maintain near max crank angle easier lol

Which manuals? I’ve only seen it documented in 1 9.12/9.13 manual. And I have over 80 lol

Yeah, behind throttle

That’s what the rhombus (diamond) is for. To show you the direction and magnitude of antenna movement. It will cover target when in the middle

I mean I have a 9.12-9.13 manual that doesn’t even mention it. We have a maintenance manual talking about how to fix it. Su-27SK manual uses the word “it’s possible.” We have pilots that said it never happened to them. I mean if it was really designed that way, why go to the trouble of putting in blanking circuits for radar, SPU, SOD, IFF? Whats the most likely? Maybe it’s functional in some aircraft and not in others……

Thank you 1. I don’t know for sure, but I would bet it uses the same range/fuel consumption table I showed in my video assuming you are at that speed. That chart is everywhere you “minimum fuel consumption of MiG-29” mentioned. 2. By fuel reserve, I bet they likely mean the 550 kg when number 2 tank is just left and it shows up on Ekran 3. The hydraulics will remain powered as long as the engines spin high enough, I believe 35% rpm. Below that there will be a slight amount of time where the hydraulic pressure will be decreasing but still functional.

Limitation of MiG-29. It may become possible when COOP is implemented

You probably just changed modes at wrong time. Like for example change from HPRF to MPRF only under 30-35 km max.

No, you would have to relock

How am I getting so many negative comments about my voice? Sure I might be over enthusiastic sometimes…….

No, that’s updated software with R-77 lock. I posted images above of every single stage of datalink guidance from before radar contact, after, and lock Here’s some more in search stage, guidance circle is centered

Maybe they finally simulated the darker underside of the reticule.

Many Soviet bombs now have same explosive update, namely FAB-250-M62, FAB-500, Betab(shp)

With COOP, HMS, first sensor to lock is primary. But both will lock when possible anyhow. If you get HMS lock more then 30 degree from nose, guaranteed to be radar lock only with COOP.

It should be possible, it was on older R-27, to reach 90 km with R and 130 km with ER. The limit is radar range. So you’ll probably be limited to 70 km in fulcrum unless it’s home on jam.

If maintenance manuals say it can be fixed, I believe them

Agreed

I would like it if first detent could also be made a “toggle.” A lot of us don’t have tons of switches or dual detent triggers

Well, there is also no memory mode currently implemented.

You should land closer to 300 kmh pre flare. That’s how real pilots do it.

The Su-27SK manual also uses the words “it is POSSIBLE when flying with radar on for SPO-15 to malfunction.”