AeriaGloria

Well once modeled we will be able to do something talked about in manuals, getting locks with R-73/R-27T on ground targets and shooting them

I noticed it also sees bullets in addition to flares.

I love it. But using the most un charitable malfunctioned modeling of the SPO-15 with radar on really dampens my enthusiasm. IRST is great work. But the SPO-15…. Makes me sad when I have all these documents describing the blanking circuits between radar and SPO

Or the aero manual.

I think they were just intent on digitalizing the MiG-23 HUD, I mean it doesn’t show target speed or alt either without datalink. It was originally meant to get MiG-23 HUD but company that made ILS-31 said “it’s possible to make modern digital HUD, let us do it.” Then Su-27 is here and they decide to, (checks notes), add 24 different extra elements and upgrades to the HUD symbology lol

Well false contacts are modeled. So that will happen. Are you using AUT setting? Don’t

No, all I mean is that if target can be seen by the laser it’s being constantly ranged to make your pipper accurate. It always remembers a target that is the current focus, wether lazing or unable to laze In a CCRP, when the target goes under it it just remembers target position since it can’t laser it anymore, so it has to use its gyros. There is no one better way to do something, when properly modeled CCIP should pretty much as good as CCRP ( corrected for distance), and both better with pre designation. The process is simple Nose below 10 degrees, laser on ranging where my bombs will fall Lead is less then 12 degrees I can CCIP drop with one press Lead is more then 12 degrees I do CCRP, and when target goes under nose the position is remembered despite no lazing to accurately drop bomb at right time If I pre designate, just add “laser lazes spot and compares present pipper position to lazed pre designated spot to determine wind/movement correction” Other then the “laser is on for 30 sec and off for 32 sec” that is extent of laser interaction

It’s used for all air to ground as primary ranging. For CCRP, the WCS just remembers target position if under the nose. The only other way to range is inaccurate radar altimeter like Hind. And that doesn’t work well for strong dives. If your doing air to ground and the “A” denoting laser is on isn’t on, your doing something wrong or burned it out.

It’s from two years ago, back then things were changing patch to patch and sometimes we and sometimes not. Just use flares to target at night now

Yeah, you get A at the right time. I also tested the radar altimeter ranging with laser off.

All manuals, 9.12, 9.12A, 9.12B, show the right border in the TP mode. It doesn’t matter which of the three becuase their HUD only determines on software updates they can all have. Video evidence shows this as well.

I mean either it’s 9.12 or 9.13 which could be loaded with same software. Nothing else has the same HUD.

It is normal. It just covers a range of few clicks. It would be pretty hard to set the lamp to neutral if it covered only exactly one click wouldn’t it?

Pre designation doesn’t matter, all weapons can be employed without pre designation. All pre designation does is correct for wind and target movement. I have no idea why manual omits this and confuses everyone into thinking it’s something else I have only gotten bombs to drop accurately in CCIP, you have to look for when bomb fall line starts to rise above the 12 degree limit. I find CCRP so innacurate as to be worthless

Agreed. If turning radar off then on really helps, maybe even every 10th radar cycle.

I would really love clarification for this. Becuase as far as I can tell in my testing, the leading edge flaps are down all the time with both settings. And nothing I could do could make them go up in “takeoff” flaps. And the LEF only have two settings, down or up.

One of the 80 MiG-29 manuals I read recently, honestly probably combat employment or L-18 Atill won’t show us exactly where the target is! Unless it’s set up for the one of three interception methods that sends you straight to target and your 100% nose on, just like now with radar or IRST lock

Like it doesn’t have a laser. And all pictures show it’s 4 pylons only used for fuel tanks

It’s a current bug I like very much thank you!!!!

The aero manual says the controls have good authority even below 200 kmh. The engines do have a high thrust in idle It should sustain AB climb at peak climb speed (Mach 0.9-0.95) up to 50,000 feet, and still climb higher as long as speed is higher It should buffet around 15 degrees, you can feel it with FFB. I think you will find that DCS F-18 still out turns it in every way.

The specific wording of the Su-27 manual is this sentence “When the RLPK and LOO6 operate simultaneously, false information may be displayed on the L006LM indicator (displaying bearing marks 10, 30, 50, 90 from the left and right, type X, power gradation up to 8, marks B, NI CAPTURE).” Emphasis on the word “may.” Other translators will translate it as “it is possible for false information to be displayed.” Far from conclusive “this happens 100% of the time”

If this 9.12B document is an issue, I suggest you remove the upload from your server. Being on ED user files makes it seem 100% approved

The video at the start of the thread is my video. And half the comments about how I sound bad lol, not my mic but like my actual normal voice

I like this for one reason, I think it will make cranking and rolling to reverse the crank while maintain near max crank angle easier lol

Which manuals? I’ve only seen it documented in 1 9.12/9.13 manual. And I have over 80 lol