Tom Kazansky

And what does CEII's status "open beta" mean? In the ED shop it is the only module tagged "open beta".

Well there is a Nesher variant called Finger that is as close to the Kfir C.2 as it can get for your idea. It fits the timeframe but I'm not sure (at all) it was already part of the mentioned conflict: "In the 1979 contract with IAI, the Argentine Air Force stipulated that the Daggers would be equipped with new avionics and HUD systems to take them to the Kfir C.2 (and beyond in some subsystems) standard. The program, named Finger, was underway in 1982 when the Falklands War broke out. With the war over, as some of these systems were made by the British Marconi Electronic Systems, they needed to be replaced after an arms embargo was imposed by the UK. The replacement of such systems took the planes to the final Finger IIIB standard mainly by replacing the British equipment with French-built Thomson-CSF." read it here: https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/IAI_Nesher

Danke euch beiden. Sehr interessant.

Ist das bestätigt, dass TWINVIS eine F-35 auch dann aufspüren kann, wenn diese "nichts" emittiert? Die von der ILA 2018 sollen ja sogar mit Transponder geflogen sein (was Sinn macht).

Even with questioning the constructivity of those kind of OP's the thread has value. If it was a poll it would be 1 : 15 so far To get constructive myself: a trackfile showing the problems would probably help, as mentioned above.

I've been thinking a lot about this these days and I have some concerns about what will happen with DCS after Vukan and especially multicore. Will ED use the new engine to put a lot more new features into DCS what pushes our future Pc's again to the limits in 2D and VR users have similar problems like today?

Ja, das wäre die sicherste Lösung. Auch meiner Meinung nach. Ich denke trotzdem, dass Politiker anders denken und erstmal den Kauf der F-35 "verkaufen" und sich danach um die Aufstockung der Munition kümmern (können), ohne dass es die Medien/Öffentlichkeit interessiert. Ich würd's so machen.

Vielleicht ersetzt man nur die die grad noch fliegen können.

Man muss dabei bedenken dass die F-35 den Tornado und nicht den Eurofighter ersetzen soll. Die allermeisten Tornados fliegen/flogen auch nicht ständig mit scharfen Waffen. Und falls es nötig würde, bekommen wir bestimmt jede Menge die wir nachbestellen würden.

There are many threads for that topic with all pros and cons that might answer your question much faster than this one.

...like the German steam shop site of the Hornet, which I reported loooong ago and still says: "HINWEIS 1: Die Hornet ist derzeit nur in der Open-Beta-Version von DCS World auf Steam verfügbar." means: "NOTE 1: The Hornet is currently only available in the open beta of DCS World on Steam."

I don't get it. Is this a Steam issue? I have stand alone stable DCS and Marianas map for quite some time.

C for a G2. There is no edge to edge clarity with a G2. Sad but true. Good thing is, it's not your eyes

"The Orbx team is collaborating with experienced DCS campaign creators Baltic Dragon and Reflected Simulations to create engaging F/A-18C and F-16C campaigns at launch."

Ok, thanks.

Coming from Germany I hope you mean WWII

Hope you get this sorted out.

Without a track I have just one guess left: after the input of a steerpoint you have to increment the waypoint number at least once and switch back to the waypoint to get it into the Viper's nav system.

I just saw your photograph of the F10 map position. You have definitely the right format so maybe your INS alignment wasn't good. You can check that like I posted above.

To check whether your nav system works accurately or you have the right format at F10 map, you can compare your coordinates of the F10 map with your position. Either on the ground before take off or inflight with a markpoint at a known position e.g. like an airfield that you fly over.

When you make an overtly markpoint, is that the same as your F10-map position?

OP says "N42..." Screenshot says "N43..."

Hiermit soll man die Maske entfernen können (hab's nicht ausprobiert) Edit: ich seh grad, das war hier schon bekannt.

thanks a lot for clarifying. although I understand that DCS with a VR set in standby can not continue as normal, I hope some day there will be some kind of solution that does not exit DCS and losing the mission progress when I exceed/forget my VR-HMD-standby-counter. As mentioned, this is not a big problem for me, because one can set the counter as desired. thanks for looking into it! @71st_Mastiff good luck (and sorry for hitchhiking EDIT: or is it "hijaking", I don't know)

I just tried and DCS shuts down the moment my G2 goes to standby. I have a dcs.log (attached) but not a zip. Is this the entended behaviour of DCS to simply shut down on VR standby? (Shutdown occurs at about 08:03 UTC) dcs.log