Airhunter

Indeed! Or even a 80's to 90's air wing with legacy Hornets in the mix as well.

Mig 29 NATOPS :lol: Anyway, try and test the 29S, that one should have an increased turnrate and more alpha available

Can we expect a summer update soon-ish? :)

I bound mine to 3 rocker switches on my Virpil throttle. Works fine for me.

Confirmed, something broke in the logic. Now with AUX flaps up and or maneuvering flaps down with the switch in BOTH or SPOILER BRK ONLY no spoilers come up with idle power. Only with AUX flaps deployed you get the full spoiler deflection. Definitely not how it should be or how it was before.

Indeed, this is how it should work. Havent noticed that it changed in any way, will take a look though. picture for reference:

That's already implemented.

Search for the GAF Mig-29 manuals. I can also DM you the A model ones if you wanna read russian.

Yeah people who get these numbers probably pull the paddle or turn off the FBW completely. Which is just...well you know what I'm not gonna say it. The 29 is a pretty dangerous and very capable plane in ACM/BFM if flown properly. However you need to make it quick due to obvious fuel limitations.

Where on that survey is the pilot g-tolerence correction? I feel like being able to hold 9G's is an essential part of the Viper.

It's not just the seeker per se, it's a lot of the internal electronics and processors being replaced by more powerful ones.

Yeah I think having a button for a detent like in the Hornet is actually a pretty good idea. Would make MIL takeoffs in the B easier and BFM or power management in the A a bit more "safe".

Nothing, the F4U isnt even out so it's bit too soon to ask.

Doubt it.

Take a look at the current amraam. That's all I'll say.

Like Mike said, the notch gate has nothing to do with countermeasure resistence. I guess when the new guidence using the new API comes along we'll see similar performance to the amraam in terms of guidence and acquisition.

Cool, hopefully this also resolves the very weak locks. :thumbup:

Take a look at the screenshots I posted in this thread. You can clearly see that the MLC is left in AUTO and the DDD doesnt reflect what is seen on the TID. I'd advise to test this behaviour for yourself on say the Growling Sidewinder server where there's lots of people and contacts. 100% reproduceable there.

Hop onto a populated MP server and use RWS. Lock stuff up, crank with a lock etc. 100% reproduceable.

Has any work been done on the flightmodel and systems or are you guys still "stuck" on modelling? Also, will ED be responsible for the R-23/24 missiles or are you guys gonna do it, given the data on its performance is pretty widely available?

This also happens in a mostly level flight sometimes. Locks drop very easily and when you switch to pulse stt from pd stt the antenna recenters, causing a loss of lock. Any thoughts? Also, if it is the MLC shouldnt the ground clutter also appear on the DDD? Because it doesn't with it turned on. If it was ground clutter it should all appear at the same distance from the aircraft in a straight line, not randomly at different spots.

It is 100% broken/bent. Surprised there is no official statement from HB yet.

If anything I'd like a "bloom" slider in the options. The game is waay too bright/bloomy right now, making all light sources glow like neon in an 80's movie.

It is 100% on. Hop in the RIO pit or use RWS with Jester and you'll see.

The entire radar is kinda a mess right now, STT resets your gimballs, RWS barely works and produces a ton of fake contacts and clutter etc. And locks break very easily.