S.E.Bulba

Bitte schön! :shifty:

Google Translate Yes, that's right. The USSR Ministry of Defense did not consider it advisable to use air-to-air missiles in army helicopters because of the unlikely nature of helicopter air battles. If such situations would suddenly arise, it was believed that the helicopter would be able to solve these problems with standard weapons: ATGMs or GAU armaments. At the same time, preparation for launching AAMs with an uncooled or thermoelectrically cooled photodetector of the IR homing head (R-60 and R-60M, respectively) will be somewhat simpler than preparation for launching Soviet MANPADS missiles (2nd and 3rd generations) with refrigerant cooling of the photodetector, in which additional controls are needed to puncture the battery and coolant unit. This greatly simplifies the installation of an AAM system with an uncooled or thermoelectrically cooled photodetector on a helicopter, which can be carried out in airfield conditions. In addition, a large number of R-60 missiles were available in army depots, and probably the USSR Ministry of Defense considered the episodic use of these missiles in Mi-24 helicopters to be less costly than the start of serial production of the Igla-V missile weapon system, the use of which in combat operations considered unlikely. Proceeding from this, the USSR Ministry of Defense apparently did not serially introduce air-to-air missiles to army helicopters, but limited itself to the fact that after the end of the full test cycle it issued a manual for the aviation engineering services of the Mi-24 units, according to which if necessary, they could independently equip helicopters with R-60 missiles. An additional manual for air crews was also issued instructing them on the use of the R-60 AAM system installed at the airfield. This was discussed in Russian forums. As for the Igla-V missile weapon system, its advertising samples could only be seen at some air shows in the 1990s and 2000s, after which they have sunk into oblivion.

Google Translate IIRC, the Igla-V system was also hung on the Mi-35M for advertising purposes at air shows in the 1990s. Photos by the Aviation and Time journal (#3'1996, p.16, ISSN 2304-1501). In addition, there are old photos of the Mi-8MTV5 with a hanging Igla-V system. Currently, the Strelets SEM is hanging on the Mi-35M for advertising purposes (photo by the Army-2017 forum).

Mi-24 • Flowers bloom

Google Translate I have to repeat that I don't recall the "procedures" I provided that mention the maximum possible detection range of 200km. And I still do not quite understand where you got these specific numbers. Why, for example, not 50km, not 100km, or not 1,000km at all? We are not talking about the detection range in outer space of the launched Space Shuttle engines? In addition, not only atmospheric phenomena or smoke can affect the detection range. A significant role in attenuating the ultraviolet components of the attacking missile signature is also played by the tropospheric ozone, the concentration of which increases somewhat at heights of up to ~3km (the so-called "smog" ozone). By the way, about the passive-ultraviolet missile warning systems was a good article in the Journal of Electronic Defense (JED) No.12/1999, pp.51–54 [ISSN 0192-429X].

:rolleyes:

Исходя из чего сделаны такие выводы? Вооружённый катер существует ещё со времён DCS: ЧА1, т.е. как минимум с 2008 года, когда никакого проекта WW2 ещё даже в планах не существовало (как собственно не существовало и самого DCS World).

Для Вас – возможно, однако за всех говорить наверное не сто́ит… ибо во всех опросах страждущих в DCS, буржуинский хеликоптер почему-то всегда занимает твёрдое 2 место, после расейского аэроплана. :)

В данном случае под «грызут локти» имелось в виду то, что иностранцы уже много лет безуспешно вангуют за буржуинский ударный вертолёт, но пока вынуждены летать лишь на UH-1H… и на всём остальном. А сейчас им ещё и [thread=211545]«Кобру»[/thread] обломали… по-крайней мере в ближайшем обозримом будущем. :)

Переходите на винтокрылую авиацию – там сейчас с проработанными отечественными крафтами почти полный «фарш»: Ми-8МТВ2, Ка-50… скоро Ми-24П обещали подвезти. Иностранцы грызут локти, летая на своих «Хьюях» и хм… «Газелях». :)

Google Translate IIRC, in the DCS World dust on the ground appears when descending to 8m. With low-altitude flight at a sufficiently high speed, the dust cloud remains behind the helicopter, and therefore, IMHO, is unlikely to have any effect on the operation of its engines. I'm afraid that ED developers will probably not agree with you. Да, все это считается. IRL, for example, the Mi-24V helicopter crew's manual stipulate the inclusion of dust-protection system immediately before take-off (when taxiing along the airfield, the dust-protection system is not required to be turned on), as well as before landing. After hover checking and transition to horizontal flight, after reducing the operation of the engines to the nominal mode, it is required to disconnect the dust-protection system. The height of turning the dust-protection system on or off in the manual is not specified, leaving it at the discretion of the pilot, depending on the surface of the landing grounds (soil, grass, concrete, etc.).

Google Translate For some reason, it seems to me that in the DCS: Mi-24P we will hear the roar of the TV3-117V engines [reference datum]. :) 4/8 AT-6 Spiral (9M114 Shturm) or 4/8 AT-9 Spiral-2 (9M120 Ataka) for the Mi-24V/P ("classic" Hind).

Похоже на блинкера указательных реле… типа советских РУ-21. :)

Google Translate Flight technician's parachute, as well as the entrance to the flight technician's compartment on the Mi-24P. Flight technician's compartment on the Mi-24P. In most cases, flight technicians did not participate in combat missions in Afghanistan because of the army order, the aim of which was to reduce losses among the flight crews. In cases where flight technicians participated in combat missions on the Mi-24, they also performed the duties of air gunners from the PKT or PKM machine guns.

Смотрел. У тебя цветной, на картинке монохромный. Дальше что?

2008: DCS: Black Shark. 2010: LockOn: Flaming Cliffs 2 (+ multiplayer compatibility with the DCS: BS). 2011: DCS: A-10C Warthog; DCS: Black Shark 2 (+ multiplayer compatibility with the DCS: A-10C). 2012: DCS World (+ BS2 and A-10C modules for DCS World) and DCS: P-51D Mustang; 2013: DCS: Combined Arms; DCS: Flaming Cliffs 3; etc.

Знаток

А ФСБ в курсе, что ED с ними борется? :)

Google Translate In addition, turn on the dust-protection system only when taking off / landing and hovering near the ground (below 10m). The inclusion of this system increases the exhaust gas temperature up to 30°C, as well as the RPM gas-generator turbine up to 0.5%. This increases the risk of premature engine failure in the event that it runs long enough in takeoff mode. When the left engine first failed in the video, you could still try to rectify the situation by continuing the flight and then landing on a single engine (DCS BS2 Flight Manual EN, [noparse]pp.10-47…10-48[/noparse]). When both engines failed, you could also avoid a crash by trying to make an autorotation landing (DCS BS2 Flight Manual EN, pp.10-50…10-51; see also the video below after 04:05).

Полагаю, что имелась в виду только цветность экрана ИТ-23МВ, типа такой: Само же изображение, транслируемое дневным каналом КАПК «Шквал», вероятно желательно было оставить монохромным, как и в реале:

http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-103.html

Разве ED удалось «договориться» c Boeing (правопреемницей McDonnell Douglas) когда вы делали DCS: F/A-18C Hornet, или с Lockheed Martin (правопреемницей General Dynamics) когда вы делали DCS: F-16C Viper? ЕМНИП, в DCS World есть отказ ED от ответственности, подразумевающий нелицензионную разработку модулей. Для Су-27СК в свободном доступе имеется РЛЭ. Для МиГ-29 (9-12, 9-13, 9-13С) в свободном доступе имеется инструкция по боевому применению (уверен, что ED использовали её, в том числе, при реализации данного модуля уровня ГС3). Что мешает сделать хотя бы кликабельный DCS: МиГ-29? У него в DCS World уже есть PFM, что мешает добавить ASM?

А теперь посмотрите на каких из названных модулей стоя́т логотипы перечисленных Вами фирм. :)

Не нужно никаких Су-27СМ, Су-35 и т.п., не слушайте никого! Делайте Су-25. :music_whistling:

Google Translate As far as I remember, I posted only advertising booklets, as well as information from the manufacturer's website, but I don't remember that they talked about the maximum detection range of 200km, or even about any maximum detection range of the MWS. Even a fairly well-known Russian advertising video by the President-S developers says: By the way, for example, the maximum range of the Swedish RBS 70 MANPADS is up to 8km. Moreover, in the 10th volume of the Russian encyclopedia "Russia's arms and technologies: the XXI century encyclopedia" [ISBN 5-93799-016-1, pp.457–458], the scanned pages of which you reposted earlier, it is written about the MWS detection range in the ultraviolet band equal to 15km. At the same time, in this encyclopedia, the Vitebsk self-protection system (aka President-S) is for some reason called 'Kolchuga', although it is not surprising, because the 10th volume of the encyclopedia was published in 2005, and the real Vitebsk (President-S) was finalized and entered service only in 2013.