Ovenmit Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 SEPECAT Jaguar Win 10pro x64 | i5 2500 | 16GB RAM | GTX1060 6GB | Logitech G940 | Tir5 + TC [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Paradox Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Well those are weird choices but it's F-104 for me (Ideally the Italian S model!) But... F-105
Bogey Jammer Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Most of people voted F-104… Are we condemned to fly 'murrican eternally ? :cry: I'll buy : МиГ-23МЛД & МЛА МиГ-27К МиГ-25 Mirage III F-4E any IJ plane 1950' Korea Dynamic campaign module
JDarksword Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Most of people voted F-104… Are we condemned to fly 'murrican eternally ? :cry: The Germans felw the G and the Italians flew the upgraded S model "Though I fly through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil. For I am 80,000 feet and climbing." -9th SRW Det. 1 Wing Ops, Kadena AFB, Okinawa, Japan [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] i5-4460, 16GB of RAM, MSi GTX 970 Twin Frozr V, ASRock H97M Anniversary, 2x 1TB HDD, Fractal design Core 1100, Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog, CH Pro Pedals, Corsair Vengeance K70, Razer Abyssus mouse, BenQ 1080P monitor.
SuperEtendard Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 I voted Yak-38 because I just find it very sexy plane. It would also be an interesting strike plane for the Soviets
Tirak Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 I voted Yak as well. It's not sexy, but it is fairly interesting, and STOVL. Would be a nice addition. The folks voting for the F-104 need their head examined.
TheJay15 Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 The folks voting for the F-104 need their head examined. Says the guy voting for what is considered one of the worst combat aircraft in history:) (although you have a point that the 104 doesnt have the greatest record)
Tirak Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 The F-104 is Fuuuuugly. The Yak is at least quirky with VTOL. not really a fan of anything on this list, but if I had to choose, I'll choose quirky.
SuperEtendard Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 Says the guy voting for what is considered one of the worst combat aircraft in history:) (although you have a point that the 104 doesnt have the greatest record) Why the Yak would be the worst combat aircraft in history ??
Buzzles Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 I could have sworn this was the Razbam section, and not the wishlist section of the forum... Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here!
Robert31178 Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 You'd be right, in part. Looks like someone started another wishlist thread....but in here!!
probad Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 The F-104 is Fuuuuugly. The Yak is at least quirky with VTOL. not really a fan of anything on this list, but if I had to choose, I'll choose quirky. hey now, fugliness counts as a quirk. the least quirky here is the su-7 for sure.
SinusoidDelta Posted December 23, 2016 Posted December 23, 2016 Few aircraft have visited the stratosphere as often as the F-104 did. That makes it pretty sweet in my book. http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/sky-high-3270307/
frixon28 Posted December 23, 2016 Posted December 23, 2016 I could see RAZBAM eventually doing a Yak 38, just because they will have the experience from the Harrier with the vstol/vtol
Kev2go Posted December 24, 2016 Posted December 24, 2016 (edited) The Germans felw the G and the Italians flew the upgraded S model also Norway, Denmark, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey, Greece, Taiwan, Pakistan and Canada ( CF104) to name other users. Edited December 24, 2016 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) Nvidia RTX 5070ti 16gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 990 Evo, Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
tete4Ywis Posted February 23, 2017 Posted February 23, 2017 Voted Yak-38, awesome for carrier ops, a nice counterpart to the harrier and a great looking plane.
Kev2go Posted February 23, 2017 Posted February 23, 2017 Voted Yak-38, awesome for carrier ops, a nice counterpart to the harrier and a great looking plane. well if we were getting a first generation sea harrier. The harrier in development by razbam is the Av8B Harrier 2. Its practically a entirely different beast. Its avioncis are much newer, ITs got a HUD, MFD's, targeting pods and PGM's, The Yak 38 is still oldschool like the original harrier with mostly unguided muntions for ATG, and relies on many analog display & functions. Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) Nvidia RTX 5070ti 16gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 990 Evo, Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
sirscorpion Posted February 24, 2017 Posted February 24, 2017 None of the above on the list RED Mig31/BM>Mig25>Su17M4>Su24M>Mig23MLD"yeah i know". Blue F-15E>Mirage2000-5 or -9.
Tirak Posted February 24, 2017 Posted February 24, 2017 Make a module for Mi-24 at least pls. It is a best hellicopter. Mi-24P is already on BelSimTek's list.
boedha68 Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 Yak38 offcourse for against harrier. Carriers on sea (i remember there was a poll "would you buy carrier" :D Offcourse . And the most important thing the balance in east and west fighters in DCS. Newest system: AMD 9800X3d, Kingsting 128 GBDDR5, MSI RTX 5090(ready for buying), Corsair 150 Pro, 3xSamsung 970 Pro, Logitech X-56 HOTAS, Pimax Crystal Light (Super is purchased) ASUS 1200 Watt. New system:I9-9900KS, Kingston 128 GB DDR4 3200Mhz, MSI RTX 4090, Corsair H150 Pro RGB, 2xSamsung 970 EVO 2Tb, 2xsamsung 970 EVO 1 TB, Scandisk m2 500 MB, 2 x Crucial 1 Tb, T16000M HOTAS, HP Reverb Professional 2, Corsair 750 Watt. Old system:I7-4770K(OC 4.5Ghz), Kingston 24 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz,MSI RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), 2 * 500 GB SSD, 3,5 TB HDD, 55' Samsung 3d tv, Trackir 5, Logitech HD Cam, T16000M HOTAS. All DCS modules, maps and campaigns:pilotfly:
OnlyforDCS Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 Both the Starfighter and the Yak38 were terrible, accident prone planes that put a lot of pilots in the ground. The Su7 on the other hand is a legend. I clicked on the wrong button. :( One of those F104 votes should go to the Su7. I would however recommend there always be a none of the above option included in these polls. Current specs: Windows 10 Home 64bit, i5-9600K @ 3.7 Ghz, 32GB DDR4 RAM, 1TB Samsung EVO 860 M.2 SSD, GAINWARD RTX2060 6GB, Oculus Rift S, MS FFB2 Sidewinder + Warthog Throttle Quadrant, Saitek Pro rudder pedals.
WinterH Posted February 25, 2017 Posted February 25, 2017 Yak 38 really isn't that interesting in my opinion, and I say this as someone who is more interested in red birds than western ones. It barely had any use, flight performance was uninspiring, systems and weaponry options were meh, and payload capacity was really low. Su-7 is also something I wouldn't be too excited about as Su-17 series that followed it was the real thing. Su-7 was, in my opinion, that weird plane that wasn't sure whether it was a fighter or an attack aircraft, ending up being neither. Anyways, these polls are useless things. Razbam already has many things on their list that I am interested in having. These being: - A-6 - A-7 - Super Tucano - F-15E - Perhaps also the Mirage III So I for one, don't see the need to think for "what should they do next" for quite a few years to come. Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V DCS-Dismounts Script
Rudy Posted February 27, 2017 Posted February 27, 2017 Su-7 for sure. Was a tough and reliable attack fighter
Recommended Posts