Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hi all. i've had the Dora for years and its one of my favorite modules. recently I saw another Fw 190 was released (Anton), that I believe is an earlier model of the same plane? is there a comparison somewhere of the differences between the two, and if it's worth buying an entire new module for what looks like a very similar bird?

 

thanks for any info, just a little confused about the reasoning behind this.

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

Posted

I personally think it's worth it. It looks beautiful, and is I think the heaviest hitter, more than the 109 (because that 30mm is a pain to land). It's slower, but that doesn't mean it's not fun. And because of its armament, it's really potent in the ground attack role.

Hardware: T-50 Mongoose, VKB STECS, Saitek 3 Throttle Quadrant, Homemade 32-function Leo Bodnar Button Box, MFG Crosswind Pedals Oculus Rift S

System Specs: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS, RTX 3090, Ryzen 7 5800X3D, 32GB DDR4-3200, Samsung 860 EVO, Samsung 970 EVO 250GB

Modules: AH-64D, Ka-50, Mi-8MTV2, F-16C, F-15E, F/A-18C, F-14B, F-5E, P-51D, Spitfire Mk LF Mk. IXc, Bf-109K-4, Fw-190A-8

Maps: Normandy, Nevada, Persian Gulf, Syria

 

Posted

In comparison the Anton:

- no MW50

- slower than the Dora, even ignoring MW50

- heavier, which affects manoeuvring

- better armed with 2 more cannons

- changed interior. It’s mostly the same, but the electrical panel is more complex and there are other minor differences

 

Personally, I like the A8, if for no other reason than it being a more suitable adversary for the Spit and Mustang that we have in game. As it’s half price, just do it

System: 9700, 64GB DDR4, 2070S, NVME2, Rift S, Jetseat, Thrustmaster F18 grip, VPC T50 stick base and throttle, CH Throttle, MFG crosswinds, custom button box, Logitech G502 and Marble mouse.

Server: i5 2500@3.9Ghz, 1080, 24GB DDR3, SSD.

Posted

A-8 vs D-9 is like spit MK V vs MK IX

System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor

Posted

Yes, the A8 has 4x 20mm cannons (vs 2x on the D9). But from a ground attack perspective, I consider the D9 more versatile than the A8. The D9 has more/better bomb options and it can take rockets too. The extra speed helps. See also this thread: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=246250 . In the absence of any Rüstsätze kits to the A-8 (or the F-8 variant), I personally prefer the D-9.

 

One other point regarding the A8 is that it is historically correct place/timewise for use on the July 1944 Normandy map, in case that matters to you.

Posted

The Anton is a fairly different bird. I find it more suitable in the ground attack role due its incredible fire power and more stable flight behaviour. It's easier to fly a straight line to the ground target than the Dora. On the other hand, it is hardly able to defend itself against enemy fighters and it's too slow to run or climb away. Still I love to fly it.

LeCuvier

Windows 10 Pro 64Bit | i7-4790 CPU |16 GB RAM|SSD System Disk|SSD Gaming Disk| MSI GTX-1080 Gaming 8 GB| Acer XB270HU | TM Warthog HOTAS | VKB Gladiator Pro | MongoosT-50 | MFG Crosswind Pedals | TrackIR 5

Posted

This aircraft should shine after the new damage model is in, and it gets more ground attack weapons. It's better armored and has a radial engine, so it won't be as vulnerable.

 

The same way the P-47 will be better than the Mustang at surviving Ground attack missions.

 

You would not have seen a D9 or the 109-K4 defending against the Normandy invasion because they were not in the field then, and both models were intended more for A2A.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Late to the discussion, but I thought that, historically, the A8 also served in the anti-bomber role. Am I mis-remembering that?

PC - 3900X - Asus Crosshair Hero VIII - NZXT Kraken 63 - 32 GB RAM - 2080ti - SB X-Fi Titanium PCIe - Alienware UW - Windows 10

 

Sim hardware - Warthog throttle - VKB Gunfighter III - CH Quadrant - Slaw Device Pedals - Obutto R3volution pit - HP Reverb G2 - 2X AuraSound shakers

 

Posted
Late to the discussion, but I thought that, historically, the A8 also served in the anti-bomber role. Am I mis-remembering that?

 

It could do that but, A8 at 25k ft has not much left in power departament.

System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor

Posted

It's a sad affair.

 

 

The A8 feels half way finished and instead of adding the possiblites to carry 500kg bombs or rockets (which shouldnt be hard at all, since they r alrdy present in the game), ED rather nerfs the ammo loadout.

 

 

 

I wouldn't buy the A8 in it's current state.

Kein Anderer als ein Jäger spürt,

Den Kampf und Sieg so konzentriert.

 

Das macht uns glücklich, stolz und froh,

Der Jägerei ein Horrido!

Posted
It's a sad affair.

 

 

The A8 feels half way finished and instead of adding the possiblites to carry 500kg bombs or rockets (which shouldnt be hard at all, since they r alrdy present in the game), ED rather nerfs the ammo loadout.

 

 

 

I wouldn't buy the A8 in it's current state.

 

The Spit needs some cannon fodder, so.. there you go.

Specs:

Asus Z97 PRO Gamer, i7 4790K@4.6GHz, 4x8GB Kingston @2400MHz 11-13-14-32, Titan X, Creative X-Fi, 128+2x250GB SSDs, VPC T50 Throttle + G940, MFG Crosswinds, TrackIR 5 w/ pro clip, JetSeat, Win10 Pro 64-bit, Oculus Rift, 27"@1920x1080

 

Settings:

2.1.x - Textures:High Terrain:High Civ.Traffic:Off Water:High VisRan:Low Heatblur:High Shadows:High Res:1920x1080 RoC:1024 MSAA:4x AF:16x HDR:OFF DefS: ON GCI: ON DoF:Off Lens: OFF C/G:390m Trees:1500m R:max Gamma: 1.5

 

Posted
ED ANTI-LUFTWAFFE CONSPIRACY CONFIRMED!!!!! :shocking:
But seriously, we're getting a 262 at the end of this tunnel. And I really hope a G-6 or maybe even G-14 eventually. I'm not a fan of the Kurfürst, it's just such a no-skill fighter, and feels nasty when I fly it. But to have a Gustav, I'd actually love that like I love the Anton.

Hardware: T-50 Mongoose, VKB STECS, Saitek 3 Throttle Quadrant, Homemade 32-function Leo Bodnar Button Box, MFG Crosswind Pedals Oculus Rift S

System Specs: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS, RTX 3090, Ryzen 7 5800X3D, 32GB DDR4-3200, Samsung 860 EVO, Samsung 970 EVO 250GB

Modules: AH-64D, Ka-50, Mi-8MTV2, F-16C, F-15E, F/A-18C, F-14B, F-5E, P-51D, Spitfire Mk LF Mk. IXc, Bf-109K-4, Fw-190A-8

Maps: Normandy, Nevada, Persian Gulf, Syria

 

Posted
It's a sad affair.

 

 

The A8 feels half way finished and instead of adding the possiblites to carry 500kg bombs or rockets (which shouldnt be hard at all, since they r alrdy present in the game), ED rather nerfs the ammo loadout.

 

 

 

I wouldn't buy the A8 in it's current state.

 

Nah, Fw 190 A8 is modeled very good, for weapons we have to wait, ED is quite occupy to finish P-47 probably and New DM it require a lot of work.

System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor

Posted
But seriously, we're getting a 262 at the end of this tunnel. And I really hope a G-6 or maybe even G-14 eventually. I'm not a fan of the Kurfürst, it's just such a no-skill fighter, and feels nasty when I fly it. But to have a Gustav, I'd actually love that like I love the Anton.

 

G-6 with MW50 or G-14 yes :)

System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor

Posted
hi all. i've had the Dora for years and its one of my favorite modules. recently I saw another Fw 190 was released (Anton), that I believe is an earlier model of the same plane? is there a comparison somewhere of the differences between the two, and if it's worth buying an entire new module for what looks like a very similar bird?

 

thanks for any info, just a little confused about the reasoning behind this.

 

Go for Dora, if you master this true energy fighter then you can handle any other plane in DCS. She will teach you how to behave.

I don't know why they went for the A-8 (and F-8) though, maybe if somebody could enlighten us, that'd be great.

Specs:

Asus Z97 PRO Gamer, i7 4790K@4.6GHz, 4x8GB Kingston @2400MHz 11-13-14-32, Titan X, Creative X-Fi, 128+2x250GB SSDs, VPC T50 Throttle + G940, MFG Crosswinds, TrackIR 5 w/ pro clip, JetSeat, Win10 Pro 64-bit, Oculus Rift, 27"@1920x1080

 

Settings:

2.1.x - Textures:High Terrain:High Civ.Traffic:Off Water:High VisRan:Low Heatblur:High Shadows:High Res:1920x1080 RoC:1024 MSAA:4x AF:16x HDR:OFF DefS: ON GCI: ON DoF:Off Lens: OFF C/G:390m Trees:1500m R:max Gamma: 1.5

 

Posted

It was the most produced Anton variant, and was a prominent ground attacker after the Stuka was phased out. I dont think we need any more reason that that.

Hardware: T-50 Mongoose, VKB STECS, Saitek 3 Throttle Quadrant, Homemade 32-function Leo Bodnar Button Box, MFG Crosswind Pedals Oculus Rift S

System Specs: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS, RTX 3090, Ryzen 7 5800X3D, 32GB DDR4-3200, Samsung 860 EVO, Samsung 970 EVO 250GB

Modules: AH-64D, Ka-50, Mi-8MTV2, F-16C, F-15E, F/A-18C, F-14B, F-5E, P-51D, Spitfire Mk LF Mk. IXc, Bf-109K-4, Fw-190A-8

Maps: Normandy, Nevada, Persian Gulf, Syria

 

Posted (edited)
I don't know why they went for the A-8 (and F-8) though, maybe if somebody could enlighten us, that'd be great.

 

:doh:

 

Seriously?!?!?

 

1. NORMANDY

2. HISTORICAL ACCURACY

 

:huh:

Edited by DD_Fenrir
Posted
:doh:

 

Seriously?!?!?

 

1. NORMANDY

2. HISTORICAL ACCURACY

 

:huh:

 

Mhm.. So ED has all the data they need to accurately model it, isn't it?

Specs:

Asus Z97 PRO Gamer, i7 4790K@4.6GHz, 4x8GB Kingston @2400MHz 11-13-14-32, Titan X, Creative X-Fi, 128+2x250GB SSDs, VPC T50 Throttle + G940, MFG Crosswinds, TrackIR 5 w/ pro clip, JetSeat, Win10 Pro 64-bit, Oculus Rift, 27"@1920x1080

 

Settings:

2.1.x - Textures:High Terrain:High Civ.Traffic:Off Water:High VisRan:Low Heatblur:High Shadows:High Res:1920x1080 RoC:1024 MSAA:4x AF:16x HDR:OFF DefS: ON GCI: ON DoF:Off Lens: OFF C/G:390m Trees:1500m R:max Gamma: 1.5

 

Posted
Nah, Fw 190 A8 is modeled very good, for weapons we have to wait, ED is quite occupy to finish P-47 probably and New DM it require a lot of work.

 

 

Yes, the model is very nice.

 

 

But playing it at the moment, it feels like a "castrate" with core features like MW-50 and proper weapon loadouts missing. Like wtf are you gonna with it? :joystick:

Kein Anderer als ein Jäger spürt,

Den Kampf und Sieg so konzentriert.

 

Das macht uns glücklich, stolz und froh,

Der Jägerei ein Horrido!

Posted
Yes, the model is very nice.

 

 

But playing it at the moment, it feels like a "castrate" with core features like MW-50 and proper weapon loadouts missing. Like wtf are you gonna with it? :joystick:

 

Im not sure if A8 was running mw50

System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor

Posted
Yes, the model is very nice.

 

 

But playing it at the moment, it feels like a "castrate" with core features like MW-50 and proper weapon loadouts missing. Like wtf are you gonna with it? :joystick:

 

It has been fairly comprehensively proved that the Fw 190 A-8 was never fitted operationally with MW-50.

 

Proper loadouts, yes, I agree, are overdue.

 

Play historically accurate match-ups against Spitfires on the Normandy map is what you do with it.

 

 

As a side note, what the hell is it with the top-trumps crowd in this place? Did y'all just pile in from War Thunder? "I pay to win bro, why should I spend $$$ on a worse plane?"

 

:huh:

Posted
It has been fairly comprehensively proved that the Fw 190 A-8 was never fitted operationally with MW-50.

 

 

 

Proper loadouts, yes, I agree, are overdue.

 

 

 

Play historically accurate match-ups against Spitfires on the Normandy map is what you do with it.

 

 

 

 

 

As a side note, what the hell is it with the top-trumps crowd in this place? Did y'all just pile in from War Thunder? "I pay to win bro, why should I spend $$$ on a worse plane?"

 

 

 

:huh:

Now you finally understand where I'm standing.. ED chose a castrated 190 A8 instead of a 109 G6.. I would never understand.. probably to satisfy some egos. Probably..

 

Sent from my Redmi 5 using Tapatalk

Specs:

Asus Z97 PRO Gamer, i7 4790K@4.6GHz, 4x8GB Kingston @2400MHz 11-13-14-32, Titan X, Creative X-Fi, 128+2x250GB SSDs, VPC T50 Throttle + G940, MFG Crosswinds, TrackIR 5 w/ pro clip, JetSeat, Win10 Pro 64-bit, Oculus Rift, 27"@1920x1080

 

Settings:

2.1.x - Textures:High Terrain:High Civ.Traffic:Off Water:High VisRan:Low Heatblur:High Shadows:High Res:1920x1080 RoC:1024 MSAA:4x AF:16x HDR:OFF DefS: ON GCI: ON DoF:Off Lens: OFF C/G:390m Trees:1500m R:max Gamma: 1.5

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...