Prowler111 Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 If FSX TacPack SDK Released :) Or not... Let me get something clear here.. We dont use tack pack we are not even looking to use tack pack. We have working ordnance in FSX since 2006, way before VRS, sure it was just on missions, but we had matching visuals with it. We have free flight working ordnance in FSX since 2010, with booms! and blams!, ordnance that affects the flight model and it´s truly independent from the model, hits the ground and leaves a mark there We have a working gun (not effects) since 2011, we even have a Chukar drone being an AI model, with set able flight path,launched from your aircraft in Volume III of the A-7´s. We have working radar, AA/AG, we even have a working terrain avoidance radar,with real imagery on the screen.....all this in FSX... The only (and sole) reason why we don´t add guided weapons in FSX is that there is absolutely no use for them in a "sterile" environment.We create weapons since we like to simulate an aircraft as close as possible, with all the steps necessary prior to launch a weapon, for instance, in our A-7´s, you have all the modes, selections, and options per weapon prior to even launch it. we don´t need Tack Pack we were there before Tack Pack. And while it seems and sounds like a truly remarkable add on, whenever it´s going to be relased (or not) we really don´t care about tack pack, since we simply don´t need it, and never did.Kudos to VRS and Tack Pack, but not our game, we create our stuff in-house, to meet our own demands. Regarding DCS and weapons. We are planning to use DCS´s weapons, no need to reinvent the wheel, and i presume it will be easier for multiplayer engagements. Best regards Prowler
Prowler111 Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 Will the FSX version be able to fire missiles? Or drop bombs? Or will these functions first be introduced in DCS World version? (HJ) ..Sorry, i overlooked your post.. Yes it will (FSX) Best regards Prowler
HiJack Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 Let me get something clear here.. We dont use tack pack we are not even looking to use tack pack. We have working ordnance in FSX since 2006, way before VRS, sure it was just on missions, but we had matching visuals with it. We have free flight working ordnance in FSX since 2010, with booms! and blams!, ordnance that affects the flight model and it´s truly independent from the model, hits the ground and leaves a mark there We have a working gun (not effects) since 2011, we even have a Chukar drone being an AI model, with set able flight path,launched from your aircraft in Volume III of the A-7´s. We have working radar, AA/AG, we even have a working terrain avoidance radar,with real imagery on the screen.....all this in FSX... The only (and sole) reason why we don´t add guided weapons in FSX is that there is absolutely no use for them in a "sterile" environment.We create weapons since we like to simulate an aircraft as close as possible, with all the steps necessary prior to launch a weapon, for instance, in our A-7´s, you have all the modes, selections, and options per weapon prior to even launch it. we don´t need Tack Pack we were there before Tack Pack. And while it seems and sounds like a truly remarkable add on, whenever it´s going to be relased (or not) we really don´t care about tack pack, since we simply don´t need it, and never did.Kudos to VRS and Tack Pack, but not our game, we create our stuff in-house, to meet our own demands. Regarding DCS and weapons. We are planning to use DCS´s weapons, no need to reinvent the wheel, and i presume it will be easier for multiplayer engagements. Best regards Prowler That is just awesome Prowler. Wonder why I have missed that :huh:
joey45 Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 .... we got a release (not public yet) date for the FSX version, which means work into converting it into something inside DCS World universe will begin. Best regards Prowler The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
HiJack Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 Do you by any chanse have a HD video showing the 3D cockpit of the RAZBAM A-7K/TA-7/EA-7L Corsair II Volume 3? I guess that is the most current aircraft in your set? There is no dates on the product release on your site. That may be the only reason I have not bought any of them. (HJ)
SUBS17 Posted July 31, 2012 Posted July 31, 2012 Let me get something clear here.. We dont use tack pack we are not even looking to use tack pack. We have working ordnance in FSX since 2006, way before VRS, sure it was just on missions, but we had matching visuals with it. We have free flight working ordnance in FSX since 2010, with booms! and blams!, ordnance that affects the flight model and it´s truly independent from the model, hits the ground and leaves a mark there We have a working gun (not effects) since 2011, we even have a Chukar drone being an AI model, with set able flight path,launched from your aircraft in Volume III of the A-7´s. We have working radar, AA/AG, we even have a working terrain avoidance radar,with real imagery on the screen.....all this in FSX... The only (and sole) reason why we don´t add guided weapons in FSX is that there is absolutely no use for them in a "sterile" environment.We create weapons since we like to simulate an aircraft as close as possible, with all the steps necessary prior to launch a weapon, for instance, in our A-7´s, you have all the modes, selections, and options per weapon prior to even launch it. we don´t need Tack Pack we were there before Tack Pack. And while it seems and sounds like a truly remarkable add on, whenever it´s going to be relased (or not) we really don´t care about tack pack, since we simply don´t need it, and never did.Kudos to VRS and Tack Pack, but not our game, we create our stuff in-house, to meet our own demands. Regarding DCS and weapons. We are planning to use DCS´s weapons, no need to reinvent the wheel, and i presume it will be easier for multiplayer engagements. Best regards Prowler Yes but in the above list I see no mention of full mp combat capability which is the whole point of Tacpac. I see you're not interested in it at this stage but it won't be so sterile with FSX@war. So if and when Tacpac gets an SDK don't rule it out otherwise no mp combat capability. :thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
Airbuster Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 Another pic. sure it´s FSX; but we want to give you an idea of how complex and accurate we are aiming with this project Wow, let me quote that beauty again. Looks really nice, great job! Looking forward to fly your Harrier in the future.
Teapot Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 Well, I'm happy that RAZBAM are developing for DCS. I'll definitely be buying these products in their DCS iteration. Hope you guys branch out and develop for X-Plane as well! ;o) "A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft." Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking!
Highwayman-Ed Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 That is a thing of beauty. If you guys can nail the flight model it will be THE add on for DCS Intel i9-9900KF @5.2GHz MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon 32GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR3200 RAM MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio 40" Panasonic TH-40DX600U @ 4K Pimax Vision 8K Plus / Oculus Rift CV1 / HTC Vive Gametrix JetSeat with SimShaker Windows 10 64 Bit Home Edition [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
TurboHog Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 I see something that looks like a radar. Is this the AV-8B Harrier II Plus with the AGP-65 radar? oops found it in post #27 sorry for not searching :P 'Frett'
Prowler111 Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 Well, I'm happy that RAZBAM are developing for DCS. I'll definitely be buying these products in their DCS iteration. Hope you guys branch out and develop for X-Plane as well! ;o) LOL funny you mention this, because i tried once, and it´s definitely too much of a hassle for such a small return.. Prowler
badger66 Posted August 1, 2012 Posted August 1, 2012 Well, I'm happy that RAZBAM are developing for DCS. I'll definitely be buying these products in their DCS iteration. Yep , so will I ..... that Harrier cockpit is just a work of art to be honest .
Teapot Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 LOL funny you mention this, because i tried once, and it´s definitely too much of a hassle for such a small return.. Prowler Please try again! :) "A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft." Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking!
Exorcet Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Related topic: Is anyone developing probe-and-drogue capable refueling aircraft for all these high-speed navalized jets, i.e. Harrier, Hornet, Corsair II/SLUF? S-3 Awaiting: DCS F-15C Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files
Pyroflash Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Related topic: Is anyone developing probe-and-drogue capable refueling aircraft for all these high-speed navalized jets, i.e. Harrier, Hornet, Corsair II/SLUF? The SH is its own refueling aircraft. If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.
SUBS17 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Please try again! :) No he should stick to DCS.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
Milene Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Why is RAZBAM not under the section 3d party developer? No contract or am i missing something? Flanker, Flanker 2.0, Flanker 2.5, Lockon, FC1, FC2,FC3, BS1, BS2, A10C, CA and World [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Jona33 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Why is RAZBAM not under the section 3d party developer? No contract or am i missing something? As explained before they'll get a section when they show their aircraft in DCS World. Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing
Gecko6 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 Wags Posted: "Once we have a proof of concept up and running in DCS, RAZBAM will have their own set of forums." What exactly defines POC in ED terms? I do not see anything that states imported model, or functional aircraft? Where did you see this definition Jona?
Jona33 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 I think it's time for Third Party Projects --> RAZBAM simulations forum's section. ;) Bye Phant Not until we get it into DCS.. Prowler Here. Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing
Gecko6 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 I guess I need to clarify a bit. "it" does not mean model, or functional air frame, nor does it define EDs requirements. Forgive me now if my observations are wrong: IRIS, from what I can tell does not have any of there birds in DCS. They recently stated that the Tomcat is going to be first due to the AFM hurdles with the F22 and the F15 Echo becoming an ED bird. No shots of the Mig-21 in DCS at this time. The Hawk is the only one that I believe has been imported and looks great. I am excited for the Typhoon also. Yet all 3 of these project developers have forums. Razbam has not stated which one of their birds is first, so how does the term "it" define or answer the question? Hopefully it is the Corsair. I am looking for a definitive answer and not speculation. Nothing more, nothing less. It is great that you are willing to speak up, but the question needs someone in the know to answer. impressive number of posts thou.
59th Ducky Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 ... impressive number of posts thou. Olympic fever... :megalol:
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted August 2, 2012 ED Team Posted August 2, 2012 Incorrect Gecko6 Mig-21 Footage in DCS http://www.youtube.com/user/beczl?feature=watch Iris are working on the BD-5J first to learn DCS methods but have already proof of concept here with F-15E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84xX3sHnpgc&feature=plcp Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Gecko6 Posted August 2, 2012 Posted August 2, 2012 I stand corrected and glad to be wrong. Thanks for the post BIGNEWY and Ducky!
Recommended Posts