All Activity

That sounds plausible to me. I'll check which mod could be suspect causing the error.

Recreating their Saved Games\DCS folder did actually fix it for them Yes, there is some auth data there. They were able to identify a specific mod causing issues as they added them back in one by one.

Well, although this error seems like the same, I guess the situation is different for me. 1st of all a recreation of Saved Games/DCS from scratch fixed it for me but not for @H60MTI I don't use any VPNs and my network is working with all other applications without any issues. As a recreation of Saved Games/DCS fixed it the error can't be located within my network setup. I am just guessing now but it seems there was kind of a file marker created from last login before which had not been deleted after logout. DCS seems to read this file marker as an indicator it is still logged in and therefore logout failed. I don't know if this makes sense but the error message might suggest that. Atm I am adding the mods back to Saved Games/DCS only as needed but I still wonder why my previous configuration with all mods active did work for weeks without issues.

Sadly I haven't found a way.

So if I have steer point 9 selected (of the pre-made steer points that some PVE servers have) and I transmit it in multiplayer, it will come up as 'MKPT 500' or '501' for other players? Why doesn't it just come up as the actual steer point that everyone knows of as 9?

Ты зря такое пишешь, в этом разделе форума. Ведь любители исключительно истребителей, думаю, тебя не понимают. Вернее понимают, но совсем не разделяют твоих убеждений. Для заядлого ястреба, "штурм", или ваще "верт" - это что-то недостойное! (Есть даже такие знакомые.) А по моим наблюдениям, исключительно ястребов, среди вирпилов - подавляющее большинство! Ну да, ну да. Если сравнивать номенклатуру вооружения Ми-24П с номенклатурой вооружения для работы по земле у F-18C, то да, Ми-24 на несколько голов круче! Даже Апачь, никак не сравнится по номенклатуре вооружения В-З с F-18C. Ты явно, тут спорол чушь! Сам я "верт" и "штурм". Не ястреб я. Но Миг-29 очень нравится (эта модель). Тока вот беда. Не могу на нем летать, ибо мне нечего на нем делать!

God Bless you currenthill, You may be Christ, i do not know, you must be God. Thank you!!! Thank you a lot!!!

Should be easy to add just using the current animation for visor and targeting monocle toggle.

Could it be down to the 8KX using Valve base stations and thus more efficient tracking algos that don't tax the CPU quite as much? E.g., in their own testing Pimax found that the OG Crystal vastly outperformed Crystal Light even when NOT using eye tracking/DFR in DCS. Crystal Light does its tracking on the CPU, while the OG Crystal uses its stand alone snapdragon chipset to do the tracking. @13:45 I have it installed, will need to play around with it as I've never used it before.

Happy birthday to this thread.

I detached every input device (including trackIR) except mouse and keyboard from the system. The issue persisted. Only thing left to try for me is to try a generic wired keyboard instead of my wireless. Maybe MS is punishing me for ditching Edge....

there is another post commented on by @sleighzy turns out mods all or in part fixed the issue. the line in your log seems to be a network error. "error 99: Unrecoverable error in select/poll: This is the core of the problem. "select/poll" are system calls used by applications to monitor multiple file descriptors (including network sockets) for activity. An "unrecoverable error" in this context suggests a fundamental issue with the operating system's ability to manage network connections, potentially indicating a problem with network drivers, firewall configurations, or VPN software."

I would probably keep the Super if I didn't have the OG sitting there, but it's a lot of money to upgrade, and if the Dream Air suits me I will probably try that after seeing more reviews.

Welcome The history about WW2: ED start make the first warbirds (P-51D, Fw-190D-9) on 2012 as iconics aircrafts as Flying Leyends, no make a dedicated environment to WW2. A 3rd party called RRG Studios, claimed a standalone product called Europe 1944 WW2, with plans about a normandy map, WW2 assets and 5 aircraft (Bf-109K-4, P-47, Spitfire Mk.XI, Fw-190A8, Me262 plus ED P-51D and Fw-190D-9), centred on 1944 and build a KickStarted, claims about make them on 2-3 years with only a handred of bucks... and end on Bankrupt, abandom the project. ED salved the project and take the rests, make the KS modules and the WW2 assets pack, meanwhile Ugra Media rescue Normandy 1944 ma, release some years ago. About ED after them: ED make the Mosquito FB.VI (on early access) to ETO and the Channel WW2 Map. The Me262, missing to the RRG KS, has on research and like make a propper simulation about a early jet, no release date yet. Has building a F6F Hellcat (Expected release on End 2025 or Early 2026) and claim a A6M5 Zero module on a future, PTO WW2 Assets pack and has release free Marianas WW2 map to PTO. ED CEO Nick Grey (and The Fighter Collection), has claim to make Battle of Britain modules after PTO, as huricane and others, and expand ETO WW2 (has some ETO WW2 assets arround). About 3rd Parties, only 2 has claimed WW2 modules. Octopus-G (Russian 3rd party), has maked a I-16 Type 24, has building a La-7 and has claimed plans to make a Po-2 on WW2). Magnitude 3 has release a F4-U1 corsair module and PTO Units. By now, has no claimed other WW2 module. Ugra Media has expand Normady WW2 to the 2.0, expand them. By now, has no talked about other WW2 map. Other 3rd parties, has no claimed WW2 modules, map or assets. Polls has none required and dont make changes on WW2. Again, you're trying to make comparisons with other products that have nothing to do with DCS World. Remember how you stumbled upon that certain "AI video" that claimed things about WW2 that weren't true?

Given the J-8PP is a paper airplane and never saw service (or flew) it would be great it if you could give it a little more flexibility in the mission editor in terms of what ordinance it can carry so that mission designers can help match it with other Cold War aircraft in different scenarios. The J-8PP could stand in on Redfor in Cold War scenarios for planes like the Mig-23 but only if the weapon set is flexible (and not limited to late 80s/early 90s missiles only). The precedent for this would be for example the G91 devs planning on allowing Aim-9Bs even if the plane never successfully fired them IRL. So things like allowing R-3S (PL-2 proxy) and Aim-7E for early Cold War scenarios, R13M/M1 (PL-5B proxy) and Aim-7F for mid Cold War scenarios. I'm not for a second suggesting these are realistic loadouts but given how limited the plane set is in DCS, when it comes to PvP multiplayer scenarios we need as much flexibility as possible. Hoping Deka are open to this as it would massively help out in giving the J-8PP a home in as many Cold War scenarios as possible (rather than late Cold War/80s where its going to struggle against our late block F-16s/F-18s)

Hi, I am not seeing any issue here, can you attach your dcs log from a session where you try. If you are using unofficial mods remove them for any test. thank you

Will ED team finaly face the problem and try to solve this GIGANTIC problem of terrible edge visuals? @BIGNEWY?

Но это вертолёт, что само по себе значительно интереснее и оружия у него куча разнообразного и вообще предпочитаю наземку крабить от пвп устаёшь Я понимаю су30см, су25см3 или су35с был бы это хоть актуальная техника

Так и Ми-24П по сути не новый, современник того же МиГ-29. Даже круглосуточные возможности очень условные.

You're not the only one. I found that any IPD <64 I get a mechanical 'jam' or skip, like its not able to engage the gears to move the lenses, but anything above 64 it seems to move fine. I also wasn't blown away by the visuals or performance over the OG Crystal, but I'm going to stick with the super and hope it improves..

Миг29 сегодня такой устаревший самолёт, что особого интереса не вызывает. Как будто бы мой интерес к этой технике пропал в 20м году, когда выпустили ми24-один из лучших модулей дкс или вообще лучший. Круче все равно не будет) я больше интересуюсь су25 Отличный модуль, приятно летается и отлично выглядит. Даже взлёт посадка интересны. У меня на нём есть сбитые пвп игроки так-то. Было время, когда люди с радостью шли в бой с и16 из-за новизны впечатлений и их удавалось сбить. Сейчас только на лобовые идут, а тут у и16 всё довольно кисло) хотя 109й сбивается

None CH-47 can carry a M113, Vulcan, IFV or APC on sling, that is not realistic. In theory a CH-47 can carry some HMMVW or a 155mm artillery towed on Sling.

Just downloaded your version - amazing! Now we can really use the reventments and more in our "green" maps. Thanks a lot!

You may want to ask these questions on the Virtual Desktop Discord server, they’ll have all your answers. https://discord.gg/FTEcbPGUa8

Hello, If it is of any help, the COVERT positions of the MASTER knob do not influence the other, visible lights. Unlike in DCS, they are still to be set by the corresponding switches. Also, the A and B positions of the A-C knob can be programmed to 4 different patterns each. The COVERT positions of the MASTER knob are used to set the IR emitters only: COVERT A-C, switches the visible A-C light to the IR emitter. COVERT FORM, turns on the covert formation IR emitters. COVERT ALL, switches the A-C light to IR and turns on the formation IR emitters. For evidence, here is a link to the manual of a F-16C/D lights testing set from 2000. Revision is 2005. So, it fits perfectly into the timeframe of a 2007 USAF viper. https://imlive.s3.amazonaws.com/Federal%20Government/ID242537638455739803559945300096141041581/Test_Set_Operation_Manual.pdf The additional flash patterns for A & B position of the A-C knob can be found in that manual too. I guess you already know this document. If not, I hope this helps. Would love to see this implemented.