All Activity

I have much less FPS on this map vs others, and also certain spots of trees/terrain are not blocking LOS for AI units. They can see through it and shoot through it.

IMHO, it is very nice that ASC developer/owner has made comments this thread even though this is just a pre-order.

Everything I've seen/read indicates the 265k is absolute crap for gaming.

Appears to not be working. I typed DCS into the little search window (next to the drop-down where it says Common Settings), hit enter and nada. I can't figure out any alternative process for it.

Many thanks yes, will test this each way.

Seems this mod is dead.

That would be fun. An ME-163 would be fun too.

I'm still waiting on my Me-262..... got hornswaggled out of that.... Live and learn

I suggest to focus authentic building simulation on taller buildings and landmarks like bridges, towers, churches, large historic buildings, huge factories as - beneath rivers, mountains ect. - these are the important visual orientation landmarks for VFR. Alied WW2 pilots - without GPS - used them for orientation too.

Nope, unfortunately performance is still bad, way beyond any other dcs mods and modules. I hope the'll fix it soon.

Dang you are touchy. I've heard he also like BoB and chronologically that would make more sense to do first. In my opinion the decision to move toward PTO first could conceivably have been influence by the arrival of that other sim. And I take it you haven't bothered to watch the videos if you are claiming I said this was ED's fault.

I slowed all of them down.

Maybe I got lucky. I saw a lot of decoration objects down there. Bicycles, benches, light poles, barriers...

Let's remember that ED had simply been making WW2 aircraft in DCS World to test engine capabilities since 2012... P-51s and the Fw-190D-9s. RRG Studios claims the other aircraft with unrealistic plans on the KS. RRG itself even "promised" a pilotable B-17... and that it would deliver modules every six months, like Igor's "promises." We knew they were simply unrealistic. ED had no control over the decisions made on KS WW2 until they went bankrupt and ED saved the entire project, putting up money so those modules could be released. Let's keep in mind that ED could have let the whole project die. Now, claiming that things will be "clarified" when there are veritable rivers of ink about RRG's bankruptcy, claiming that ED was to blame, is simply kicking a dead horse. Let's remember that Nick Grey has been talking about the Pacific for years (let's say 7-8 years ago) and there are interviews to confirm it. Now, to come forward and claim that ED took PTO to attack another company is completely absurd.

or... enable GND Jettison Switch, then Jettison on ground the empty tank before the crew put a new one (in this way you are manually simulate by yourself the removal of the empty one)

Thanks! How do you access that? There are times when I miss what they said, and then I don't remember what I was supposed to do next. So I took out the Flankers, returned to watch the Hinds do their thing, then went after the Fulcrums. Wingman and I took them all down, but I never got an RTB. Flew back to base and landed, and I got a 50. LastMissionTrack.trk

Fixed! Thanks for pointing out. I advice to reinstall it, has a little change in SFM, which responds for pilot blacking out. Before that I put the wrong value accidentally.

It doesn’t matter as the ED side of things is still always changing and causing problems with campaigns. So the Tomcat being out of EA won’t change that. The campaign makers have two focus. Either planes they like, or stuff they know will sell. And stuff they know will sell means Hornet and Viper.

The problem about the C-101, was the CASA never planned them as a COIN aircraft. The C-101BB was a export trainer, the C-101CC was only a light attack version, but missing many advance funtionality. A more advanced version (C-101DD) with Radar, Chaff and flares, advanced HUD, balistic computer, RWR, HOTAS, AGM-65 Maverick compatibility and other improvements, never enter on production but was only centred on the USA market, no as a aircraft to the EDA (Spanish Air Force) never was Light Attack versions, only EB trainers. Remember the C-101 (and other aircrafts) missing incendiary and other weapons, no developed by ED on the core.

Have you tried the JULIs yet? As they have the Lima seekers, it might also SEAM. Never tried it TBH.

Still struggling to get the Mic working , works fin in WIN11 and other Apps just not DCS. Options LUA looks like this not sure if the microphone_use,voice_chat_input or voice_chat_output strings are reasonable ? ["sound"] = { ["FakeAfterburner"] = false, ["GBreathEffect"] = true, ["cockpit"] = 100, ["gui"] = 100, ["headphones"] = 100, ["headphones_on_external_views"] = true, ["hear_in_helmet"] = true, ["hp_output"] = "{0.0.0.00000000}.{ae4715d3-74ca-42eb-80ff-99a7d4233959}", ["main_layout"] = "suround_5_1", ["main_output"] = "{0.0.0.00000000}.{ae4715d3-74ca-42eb-80ff-99a7d4233959}", ["microphone_use"] = 0, ["music"] = 60, ["play_audio_while_minimized"] = true, ["radioSpeech"] = true, ["subtitles"] = true, ["switches"] = 100, ["voiceChatInSensitivity"] = -42, ["voiceChatInVolume"] = 98, ["voice_chat"] = true, ["voice_chat_input"] = "{0.0.1.00000000}.{896cb1d9-589a-4a33-9f17-23a38c5b64a9}", ["voice_chat_output"] = "", ["volume"] = 80, ["world"] = 100,

When I first came to DCS around 2021 and looked around, I was confused about what I saw on the WWII side of DCS. The choice of planes seemed odd and ED didn’t really seem overly enthused about continuing fleshing out more in that time-frame. It seemed as if they had started down one direction and then abandoned it. It just didn’t make sense. So being curious I dug deep trying to understand what ED’s game plan was for WWII long term and what was the plan with the current state? As I did I learned more about this store and realized some of the things I had herd hinted at just weren’t supported by the facts. I thought it was important enough for DCS history and lore to get a clear telling of the events. I tired to be accurate and fair. Hope I succeeded. Knowing what happened before makes the current state of affairs make more sense. How we got this weird stable of planes and why ED doesn't seem to be all that enthused about continuing on that line at the moment instead of getting to their own WWII plan, which at the moment I believe will be PTO to block Combat Pilot. Now it explains why they seemed to have start in one direction and now are going another. The current situation was never the plan. It's the wreckage. Cheers.

Yeah, that really begs the question. Maybe because the game was free, there were interactive training missions, I didn't even think of it because nowhere was the mention of manuals when i Installed the game or started it. I'm not alone. [emoji2373] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Have you tried to turn off Force Feedback in the general DCS settings? Under misc or something. Unless you do use FFB of course.. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk