All Activity

Because there is simple no need - there are numerous onboard videos of a Mossie rebuilt in NZ flying low level around Auckland without the warning horn sounding, including views of the manifold pressure, throttle position etc. Even the warning horn sounding in flight when he pulls the power RIGHT BACK to maintain slow formation. It also just takes having room-temperature IQ to know that flying around at MAX CONTINOUS power setting of 7 lbs of boost you WOULD NOT have the gear warning horn blaring the entire time - I mean REALLY? The boost/throttle position relationship is just wrong. I mean I could just ring up some mates working in Auckland rebuilding the things - by why bother, ED would just completely ignore my input anyway. The entire power delivery of the DCS Mossie has been totally incorrect for years and ED steadfastly refuse to admit it. Is the same as the Airspeed indicator reading TEMP of MPH - these aircraft were developed by computer programmers that simply have no idea about the aircraft they are developing, which is fine (not having a dig at the devs 9Line!) - but they need to accept when they have implemented the operation incorrectly, or misread an image of an ASI where the needle was obviously covering the wording (and as they do not know any better - anyone even remotely educated in aircraft knows you don't measure the temperature of your speed....) implement the wrong info/operation. I think ED would gain a lot of respect from their community if they were more willing to admit they were wrong and make effort to correct. Have been flying DCS for a very long time and it is very common to see ED adamantly profess their particular FM or system is absolutely 100% correct and has been tested by in-house SME's etc and is operating correctly...then 2 years later, X aircraft FM to receive complete overhaul (thinking of one specific fighter in particular...). Really? What happened to 100% correct? I realize it is probably easier to shut people up in the forums if you just refuse to admit it is in fact not correct, is just a shame that's all, as things like the Mossie just never get 'fixed'. Just my 2c, not gonna change anything, but poor Mossie is sitting in my hangar till fixed, and as a Kiwi and ex-RNZAF aircrew that is very sad.

Проверил на карте Ирак, выставил две частоты - не дефолтовые - на аэродром отправления - 0 канал - второй на частоту ДРЛО А-50 - 1 канал Сделал запрос обоим адресатам, оба ответили Работает, вызывал через кнопку джойстика, не командой. Не пробовали запустить полную проверку инсталляции игры с удалением лишних файлов, я так делаю каждый раз, бывает что после обновления есть непонятные файлы, из-за которых у меня один модуль однажды глючил. Модами я не пользуюсь, держу чистую игру. Ремонтируется долго, все модули за 30-40 минут проверяет.

I made some adjustments within Pimax and it seems to work fine for me now. I still have the same settings within DCS that are pictured in my original post.

MIL Range... 6' dia. pattern, wing root to wing root, drifting back from the spinner. Passed this plane after maybe a 3/4-second burst, and looked back. Like an air-burst chaff cloud. Confetti. Bowie

I also have the yellow indicator needle spinning but only on the Syria map. Stetting up RSBN/PGRM cars on Kola,and Caucasus, the needle holds steady after switching to landing mode. No matter what airbase I set up the RSBN/PGRM cars on the Syria map, the needle spins once landing mode kicks in.

I've been thinking about using velco straps and securing the comms keyboard to my thigh next. I feel it would be easier to use there. So I need to find a thin piece of plastic to mount it on with ordinary velcro first.

I suspect spherical Earth will help with that. One thing about the "feeling" of altitude is just how far the horizon is up there. In DCS, there's no real horizon, the maps are flat. It works at normal mission altitudes if you're not looking too closely, but it's missing the "hey, did I just fly into space?" feeling at the extremes.

Title. I wanted to mute sounds of ATC and Pilot voices in settings, as American accents while flying as other nations is odd. However I now realise that a side effect of doing this is that all "Bettys", all RWR and all tones like missile locks also seem to have been muted? This has happened in AV-8B, F/A-18C, JF-17, F-16C so far that I've tried. Why is "voices" linked to avionics sounds? Or is this a bug..

Thanks, @MadMonty! This worked for me also; I can see the stars on a moonless night, and most, not all, of the glare haze is gone. However, around the SRS text and JHMCS (Viper), there is still a noticeable hazy glow. I don't know if this is realistic (in real life) for the JHMCS at night or not. I flew a sunny day mission at RMS on the Cold War map, and it, too, seemed realistic with scattered clouds. Now to get quadviews working in my favor. I'm still getting the jagged staggers when I look to the side, which isn't good when flying past a ground target I need to hit when I come back around.

In previous updates in the FCR you could see the name of the aircraft and numeral, for example VIPER11 as VR11 in the radar contact simbology, since several updates it is no longer showing it up.

Wow! Ingenious!

absolutely beautiful !!!

Same, and I believe we're not alone!

Almighty Devil, Thanks worked Worked as well Thanks

Yeah that response totally missed the point. Who needs all this hipster crap - TNDL, TWS, multi-target missile BVR. Go visual guns only, Boyd will approve No need to split the hair though - current DCS F-16 implementation of TWS+TNDL symbology does not meet its own DCS F-16 documentation. Bignewy already said "this is intended to be addressed along with the corresponding DTC feature." so lets wait for few more years (this thread is few weeks short of 2yo).

Obviously, while the Rafale is not developed by MS, so I think it's very fair to say ED won't make it either. From Dassault's site regarding the Rafale. "Jointly developed by AzurPoly and Jet Fighter Experience".

The graphics are so beautiful, especially in VR (with the 3D HMD sign and helmet-mounted elements, visor). Although I've been playing mostly with the navigation for the past two weeks (it's simple, but you have to understand it) and I'm still having a lot of fun. I hope this model will open the door to Soviet aircraft for the ED and finally we will see more development on this site (the Su-24 is my favorite). What I'm missing is full radar support (and more explanation in the manual), as that's the model's Achilles' heel, in my opinion now. Other than that, really great work!

Excellent! [emoji1303] Sent from my IT_701A using Tapatalk

Seems to working now.

What good is showing off backend work? I mean, I guess some people might like seeing an ocean of code?

Smells like you did use HB UI such as the Bombing Tool, which isnt captured in the replay and has to be entered manually during replay as explained earlier in the thread, cheers.

Try to replicate on a short track on the Caucasus map in single player. Sent from my IT_701A using Tapatalk

The upside is that the mission functions as a SP, but the players act as clients – although a few trigger behaviors would probably need to be tweaked. A two-player experience would be quite nice (but without the AI), but it's clear that it requires some tweaking and work, so no pressure, just idea :).

Well, they added "The Gunners" too. Which one could argue it fits the "theme" more appropriate. [emoji12] Sent from my IT_701A using Tapatalk

It has a 50:50 chance to just turn away, but the little AI Swede seemingly prefers aggression Hmm, as I understand it, this FWAF is something only working with some WW2 ED missions? I could add a second slot to the player group for another MiG-29, but it doesn't make much sense in the given scenarios, as they are all designed for a single player. My helicopter missions are mostly Multicrew/coop though.