All Activity

To rule out an accidental double press I'm using TARGET's PULSE command to only send one single command when a button is pressed. It's not really necessary to do it that way but that's how I set it up. I just tested with the keyboard instead of the Warthog (no TARGET script running) and even with the keyboard the gear just goes up when I press the keyboard and comes down when I press it again.

Please review the following thread if it explains: In general, we want the CPU bound in the most of time so that DCS can deliver the better play result, especially lots of AI objects (tree included)

I only work on CH assets.

I didn't think I'd like it so much but it's a really fun module to use in MP, doing logistics runs and dropping off capture squads. Hope it gets some more attention and some advanced training missions.

A custom bridge and canvas effect for SignalRGB. I appreciate getting your feedback. Node.js Bridge: Collects exported cockpit data from DCS (gear, AoA, console lights, taxi, strobe, warning test, afterburner) and streams simplified JSON via WebSocket. HTML Canvas: Receives the data and turns it into real-time RGB lighting effects: • Gear → Red bar (up/down/transit) • AoA → Red / Yellow / Green indexer • Console → Green glow • Taxi → White top bar • Warning Test → Color grid • Strobe → Red blink • Afterburner → Orange flame

Thanks, will try later today

Target was waypoint, radar wasn't touched. I think it was the HSD that had everything wrong.

Thanks for the reply. I've adjusted the values downward (they were actually set at a default of 2% and 3,5%) and it does lessen the effect of bumping the pitch trim switch. Thanks for the back-story as well. Very interesting to read!

по программе управления АЛ-31Ф обороты Nвд не превышают 100%

Yeah, that autoexec.cfg was mentioned before already but thanks for pointing it out again, it's crucial for image quality tweaking. I also started on tweaking Quad Views settings. You'll need an empty settings.cfg file in C:\Users\YourUserName\AppData\Local\Quad-Views-Foveated and fill it with the following lines: smoothen_focus_view_edges=0.33 sharpen_focus_view=0.33 peripheral_multiplier=0.33 focus_multiplier=1.0 horizontal_focus_section=0.3 vertical_focus_section=0.33 Feel free to tweak your own values.

Thanks for the feedback. The damage model in DCS can be very binary when it comes down to it. Most sources consider the 9K720 to be equipped with additional armor on the roof and cabin, that's why I've set the 9K720 with its MZKT chassis to a higher armor level than the MAZ based Scud TEL. There doesn't seem to be any hard numbers on thickness available, so it's always hard to estimate the exact outcome of these variables, especially depending on the characteristics of the ammunition fired towards it. But I agree, the 20 mm ammunition you refer to should definitely be able to penetrate and defeat even the slightly up-armored MZKT chassis. I shall make a note and find a suitable middle ground. Edit: I ran some tests and I definitely agree. I've made some changes to the armor level, which now should be more realistic, while still taking into account its additional armor compared to stock chassis of this type.

DCS E-store это швейцарский магазин. Вне юрисдикции РФ. Ну и почитайте лицензионное соглашение прежде чем вспоминать про права.

Hi Bignewey, sure!, my intention was not to give to you data that you can use, just a simple information for the team to check about it.

The discord link needs updating. Error message says the invite is expired.

Please, don't turn it into yet another "Why no FF redfor?". You seem to know the reasons and the answers are still the same. "Pretty well known" and leaked docs are not gonna cut it for FF module and modeling any modern russian aircraft can endanger ED employees located there.

Hello, I just want to ask, in mission 6 and 7, I can`t use the communication button to select F10 in the menu (call the tower to land). When I landed at the base, still on the ground, I can use the communication menu. Is this normal?

Didnt know that. I thought only cold ground planes can change laser Codes. Thanks !!

Incredible. The quality looks top notch. Kudos

You dont have data on crew workflow during combat, but this kind of data is to some degree restricted even on current modern FF modules, technology itself is preety old, PESA radar was first used on 1985 Mig-31, a lot of weapons are late CW standard, capabilities are preety well known, also something being classified, doesnt mean that it's not known for aviation enthusiasts, You can proapbly find on internet that "classified" Su-27 manual, that prevent us from getting FF old Flanker, of coure becouse of legal status, cant be added to DCS, but does it mean it's secret or unknown?

Question for you guys, can you destroy the walls around buildings in Normandy?

Just have multiple groups, put them in racetrack orbit at the opposite starting point and with 2000’+ height difference. Personally, I now give my tankers unlimited fuel, so as to avoid needing the set up triggers for replacements.

It's not the age of the aircraft, but access to public data, and ideally the aircraft itself. We don't have a single British jet, even old stuff, as the British government simply doesn't grant access to that stuff. Both the Typhoon and Tornado we are getting are German aircraft. And given that the Russian aircraft themselves only used the R27 until around 2015(with the R77 only existing as less capable export version up to that point) It's actually quite realistic to have Russian MiGs and SUs flying around with R27s up until at least 2010.

I think the AG Radar is screwing with you Make it SOI and press target unlock in case its acting up again. null

No, I don’t have random failures enabled. I was flying in light rain at about 9,500 ft msl in cold weather.

Sorry I mean will you put the correct data card in the module. Regardless of style.