All Activity

If you are start in cold and dark start chanege on DED laser training to combat. Maybe this?

Or ED allowed Razbam to release the F-15E so ED could take the money from their IP dispute claim. We will never know.

Hi Bailey, I'm using your VoiceAttack profile for the F4 and like to thank you for this very useful addon. But I had a problem, when loading your file F-4E Pilot Keyboard.diff.lua into the Keyboard column of DCS: The Keyboard assignments for TACAN Channel (xx0x) - 1 to TACAN Channel (xx0x) - 9 were not loaded, as can be seen in attached picture. I think the reason was, that the strange looking ID's / GUID's (?) in the diff.lua files changed. When I did a "Save Profile" on the keyboard column and compared my saved profile with the profile you provided, I saw different ID's / GUID's (?) for above TACAN commands, e.g. d3002pnilunilcd48vd0.11111111111111vpnilvunil vs. d3002pnilunilcd48vd0.1vpnilvunil So it seems, that DCS and/or Heatblur modified these ID's / GUID's (?) after you uploaded your profile. I'm wondering, if you are able, to reproduce this on your PC and if this should be reported to DCS and/or Heatblur ? Thanks again for your profile and your efforts. Sunnny

That sounds more like incorrect use

Never the less, it is so. From day one. I think I read about somewhere from a 2nd party that it's a design choice. Regardless, just try it yourself. Push the throttle all the way forward. The green light for 3 minutes of water injection left, never turns on. Press the enable water injection binding, you get extra knots of airspeed immediately (about 9 at sea level), and after a while, the green light does turn on. The two screenshots bellow are taken with water injection off and on respectively: null There is a jump in power, or at the very least, airspeed. Look at the images above

Yup, and it's also a trick to save space if you want to run multiple server instances. Just remember to shut them down pre update. [emoji4] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I can confirm that landing on the Tarawa causes a crash, even when calling inbound.

Could be a number of things then. Maybe the instruments don't show the right values. Or it could be that the plane performance isn't directly "bound" to the pressure parameters. Might be a bug worth reporting on separately.

Yeah if it's true or not is another story. I could imagine that it's true but what if there is already an escrow with the money on it but the settlement is not yet implemented because RB still refuses to send the files? Could also be the other way around - they are willing to send the files but there is still no money. In my opinion this is the biggest problem and most exhausting part of all this. Both sides are claiming different things and except from the directly involved persons no one knows what really is true. On the one side there is RB and it seems these guys think the one screaming the loudest is the one who is right and on the other side there is ED - still acting professional and silent but suddenly had to admit on last friday that one of the "screams" of the other party is actually true.... In the meanwhile there are the customers with absolutely no clue about whats really happening and.... yes it's time again to take a break from reading this thread as i did before last friday's newsletter.....

Напомните, разве при создании маркпоинтов не должен автоматом выбираться SOI сенсор в маркпоинт-DED меню? Насколько помню, так было ранее. Сейчас вручную приходится перебирать.

Not sure were to post this, but is there any way to reduce the size of the EWR info window in the upper right of the screen? It takes up a lot of the screen and blocks your view. Thanks in advance

Can anyone advise me on how to use the laser for GBU guided bombs with a sniper pod? I haven't been able to switch to L symbol I still only have T on the screen, I can't find it anywhere. How to switch to laser pointer ?

The virtual link option between Hard Drives works fantastic of you dont have enough space. Sharing files like that doesnt make any impact on perfomance. Worth a try.

hello. this issue has been around for a long time. it does not seem to be completely solved. some people have send error went away after a complete reload of their computers. which i feel is like getting rid of ants with an a-bomb. but it indicates the issue originates at the client computer. have you tried to connect to the servers with IP instead of picking from the menu a name? also check your DNS and IPv6 on the client computer.

This is just a workaround. I have some of friends who don't even install mods because they … understand how :). While it's not quantum physics, it's hard to expect everyone to know how to do it. If ORBX has this option for its add-ons, why doesn't ED do it?

The terms of the agreement are not disclosed in public yet but on Discord, ED and Razbam sites, you can read more or less between the lines or just directly mentioned that the signed agreement is to create an independent escrow account to send the money from ED and send the files from RB. That agreement is not implemented yet as the official statement says. Of course you can think whatever about this terms, if this is true or not. Im just throwing here what im reading. But taking in count thats all about the VEAO incident consequences, a new file sharing system to be signed by all 3rd party, for me it makes sense thats exactly what both parts signed late 2024.

No! As repeated and repeated in this exact thread. SA map is NOT Razbam! It's been licensed/published whatever under the Razbam name. It's a completely different team that now work on the Kola map published/licensed under ORBX. Cheers!

Because they are not actually facts. They are the claims by one party in the conflict, who obviously has a strong incentive to present the situation in a way where they look the best. There has been no judge who has vetted those claims and established to what extent they are right or wrong, and what important details are being left out of that narrative, nor is there evidence given for most of EDs claims, so we can vet the claims ourselves. Until you accept that you are biased and don't actually tell the truth, but simply parrot ED's claims, you are going to be continuously frustrated with those who won't just assume that one side of the conflict is 100% right and honest, and the other side is 100% wrong and dishonest. I do have a tendency to put more stock into actual evidence, than claims that don't have any evidence behind them, although I am critical of which stuff is released and what evidence is not released. This is simply a lie. I don't. Again, with your immense bias, it must seem like anyone who doesn't 100% buy into EDs narrative must instead believe Razbam, but that is a you problem. This excessively broad confidentiality clause is not actually in the interest of us consumers, since it limits the extent to which we can hold the various parties accountable for their actions and make informed decisions. For example, there are people here who believe that they will be safe from such shenanigans if they don't buy product made by RB. There are also people who refuse to buy any third party module. And there are people making other choices yet again. Yet for all of these choices, there is a lack of solid information to make a fully informed choice. That you unquestionably back the confidentiality clause seems to be a case of Stockholm Syndrome, where you mistakenly believe that whatever is in EDs interest, must be in the interest of consumers. This is simply a lie. Obviously a lot of stuff they have has not been leaked, beyond just the contracts. Secondly, what was allegedly leaked is not a cease and desist letter, but a letter of demand. How do you know that they didn't seek legal guidance from the beginning? An assumption with zero proof. Which he may not be allowed to do due to the confidentiality clause. A lot of your arguments are some sort of bizarre bipolar vacillation between the claim that Razbam must obey the confidentiality clause and complaints that they are not leaking more than they are. You really need to make up your mind. Also note that it's EDs position that as DCS customers, we are not supposed to care about or comment on what happens over on the commercial military side of ED. So why are you blaming RB for playing by EDs rules this time? False. I'm very careful not to do that. We have no hard evidence that RB broke their contract. So this is not fact, but an allegation. We have no evidence of a cease and desist. You seem to be ignorant of the difference between a letter of demand and a cease and desist. Furthermore, the allegedly leaked letter of demand has not been confirmed as true by any of the parties involved and ED tells us to not to assume this (but ED also refuses to clarify whether the leaked documents are real). This is also a good example of your inconsistency, because you attack me for putting some stock in the leaked documents, but here you are clearly assuming that the leaked document is real. If you are allowed to assume that, then why would it be wrong for others to do so? Clearly you only object to people using the leaked documents as evidence for claims that you dislike. We don't actually have hard evidence that (most of) the leaks are from Razbam, although it seems a very reasonable assumption. But still just an assumption. Note that ED has also made statements that most likely violate those very same confidentiality clauses, but you don't seem to care about that. Your final sentence is again not a fact, since the claim by one side seems to be that they did accept the settlement agreement, but that ED didn't follow the agreement. Also, if you had any objectivity at all, you would realize that ED can also be accused of using the community as a weapon, based on how they communicate to the public.

Thank you for the fix in DCS 2.9.18.12722!

Another thing ... What about South Atlantic? A RAZBAM Map still up for sale and maybe not updated or worked on any more? Will it also cease to exist? Will there be optimization passes? Is it not from RAZBAM?

This appears to be the polling rate issue for the OP. It had all but been solved for most hardware some months back. If you have another mouse lying around, try it out and see. There might be some old communications about it. There's more information out there I'm sure, but you'll need to provide more specific hardware details, its a hardware based problem.

HB should have done the F-15E in the first place. Even though the WSO is optional in the MUD Hen it should have had Jester. As for the rest- I really don't have a prefernce as to who supports them. All I know is that if RB isn't willing to return to DCS or sell the rights to their module to another developer then they should start discussions about new modules.

Ok, thanks. Yes, the first line of your quote is from the first post of this thread but doesn't have anything to do with an escrow. How do you know that there is no escrow? Just because there is an agreement which is not imlemented yet? Sorry, maybe i'm a bit lost but i don't get it.

Please, have you report my issue on ah64?