All Activity

FWIW, out of th 29G manual: There's no mention of aileron throw being decreased to +/-5° above 18° AoA. It just mentions a reduction in aileron authority above 18° AoA. Now, the authority part may be bad translation (could be meaning authority as in "aileron effectiveness"), but then agian neither does it state a reduction in throw to 5° or any other value for that matter. It says the ailerons are placed 5° up from the aircraft's horizontal reference line in neutral position - that's a wonky way of saying the ailerons at neural are both 5° up to create more washout - in order to decrease any induced yaw during rolls. ARI is mentioned as a function of the AFCS Damper at high AoA (whatever that means): "Lateral control is provided mainly by the ailerons, assisted by the tailerons if the LEFs are IN, and by the rudders at high AoA, provided the stability augmentation system is operating." [...] "Aileron-rudder-interconnect is provided at high AoA by the stab aug system to improve lateral stability."

На данный момент если проверять работу по такой угрозе как ЗРК "Хок" то мы видим что, при взятие на сопровождение ЗРК лампа сигнализирующая условную дальность обстрела по шкале мощности начинает мигать на не соответствующей дальности начала (возможной) стрельбы ЗРК "Хок" а гораздо раньше на средних и больших высотах ! То есть информативность мощности отсутствует полностью ! Получается что сближаясь с ЗРК который вас ведет шкала мощности нарастает против часовой и проходит лампу которая мигает с частотой 2 Гц (типа показывает мощность на которой возможен обстрел-захват) и при дальнейшем сближении и захвате маня ЗРК скачкобразно лампы на шакале мощности загораются на нужную дальность (горят 10-11 ламп шкалы) ,а лампа в начале дорожки продолжает мигать ! Индикация условного пуска с загоранием треугольника с другой стороны шкалы и условным перемещением мигающей лампы с частотой 8 Гц по часовой стрелки отсутствует полностью !

Thanks, I didn't have the Legacy support folder installed. Still it doesn't work for me - the ERO units dont show up, neither in the static objects nor in the air defense units.

would also be useful for airfields to go dark when under air attack.

I can't get the rotor blades moving with the engine levers 1 and 2

I have tried bombing as well and I can’t get them on target… falling short continues

My computer died before I got really into it, but the Kiowa has excellent "AI helper", and it's not that hard to be a single crew, No seat switching at all! It's super easy to be single crew. I can easily fly and plink tanks at the same time. It's somewhat harder at night, I'll admit that. If you have an extra screen and an extra joystick, one can do multicrew on one computer. Export the Viviane and have a friend plink the tanks with the second joystick. My GF finds it really satisfying.

Depending on the map, it might be useless as the light might be baked into the ground texture itself. Other than that, it's already been wished for quite a few times.

What other mods do you have installed? That is typical of a mod issue. Doesn't matter if you're using the mod or not, if it's installed it can cause issues.

Hi, Would it be possible to consider the idea of making a "Turn off light" trigger similar to the "Destroy Scenery" one ? It would allow people to create a more elaborate trigger i.e. : if this building is destroy (lets say XYZ powerstation) then "Turn off building light" within the shaped area. It would allow to "simulate" more immersively some "airstrike" and the "effect they have on the battlefield". Opinion ?

Having the very same bug, I had to post in Polychop discord : kind of game breaking one for the Kiowa I think....

Technically the 29 has slats and the 16 has LEFs, but that's just a tangent on semantics. The 29G manual says the LEFs [sic!] are out when: - either of the two flap DOWN buttons is pressed - landing gear is selected down (gear down overrides flap up) - maneuvering (greater than 8.7° AoA for extension, lower than 7° AoA for retraction, Mach below 0.8 [+0.1 / -0.05]) More LEF trivia: - "LEF out" disengages differential taileron - the Damper AFCS mode will counteract any pitch moments due to LEF operation (unless flaps are down)

Станция предупреждения помех Л006 ставилась на многие самолеты и вертолеты восьмидесятых годов ! так в частности Л006С на Су24М, Л006Л на Су27, Л006ЛМ на Миг29 и тд и тп. отличались как индикаторным табло так и пультом управления в кабине и соответственно режимами и подрежимами ! На данный момент реализация работы Л006ЛМ в модуле Миг29 (9-12) мягко говоря не совсем соответствует действительности ! Начнем с описания индикации на самом индикаторе СПО при его работе ! Вот штатное описание световой и звуковой индикации при характерных угрозах:

Sorry, when I use the UH-60L as a flying model in the quick mission, the Engine Control 1 and 2 work. But when I use cold start in the quick mission, they don't work. Hence my comment

The USS Walker will not render when used in Mission Editor. Tried adjusting LOD from 1 to 2. This did not fix the problem. All suggestions to correct appreciated,

КОЛС в режиме ТП строб вообще отстой , кого то захватить почти не возможно .

Honestly, I'm not all that interested in WWII aircraft as much as some, so the fate of the Mosquito isn't something that I think about very often aside from when it comes up in threads like these. If I want to go for a flight in a piston warbird, I normally do it in the Bf-109. But the reatlity is if I'm flying an aircraft with multiple crew, I want to be but one of them, most likely aircraft commander, and I don't want to have to do a lot of seat switching in any DCS aircraft. The UH-1 is designed so that either crewmember can work the radios, so in that case a simple level autopilot is ok. Plus, the guy in the left seat can operate the swiveling forward-facing miniguns on his own, if I'm not in that seat. That's a big deal. The George and Petrovich AI that exist on Apache and Hind can also work the weapons while I fly and I don't need them to tune radios or navigate anyway. It's my understanding that the third party Kiowa and Gazelle, while excellent technical renditions, require a lot of seat switching, and that's a major reason I decided to pass on them. Multicrew AI that can actually do something other than temporarily fly straight and level is something I've come to expect from DCS aircraft these last few years, and to do otherwise, annoys me. Again, I'm not going to revolt against ED because of the Mosquito, but imho, I think this aircraft needs a lot more than "auto-level". It's a pleasure (and easy) to fly, but as of now, it's a hangar queen that occasionally gets to fly a pattern around the airfield. I guess I could just use the NS-430 popup like I typically do in the Mi-8, or be lazy and just use the F-10 map, but whatever...It's an awesome simulation of the aircraft thus far, so yeah, finish the darned thing off!

IIRC, Apache is also prohibited to fire rockets from inbound pylons while in hover.

Переключил кодек на 265, выставил 150 мегабит - и даже на годлайке оно перестало затыкаться. Спасибо всем ответившим! А трекинг рук, работающий в ДКС, в Пико 4 есть? Если да - как включить? В настройках шлема активировал.

Did some digging and looks like you're right. However, we are missing L&S BE reading from bottom right of the display though.

I apologize if I am not satisfied with this answer... the DC has been in development for over a half decade. Indeed what you say makes sense when test-bedding at an Alpha state. I can't help but infer that this means "the basics are not done" internally - and thus that the initial launch of DC will be considered a first delivery of "the basics". That the DC (whenever it finally launches) will launch as Caucasus, Modern Era, SP only - and thus leave us many more years of development time for all maps, ell eras, multiplayer... and any other features that we are all expecting. I do not think I am alone in regarding the above as the "basics" - core essential components, and completely reasonable for us to expect at launch after even 3 years of internal dev time (if ED was allocating resources adequately), let alone 5+ years. But what is being done here to surpass community expectations at launch? Or will the DC launch like the "saved game" feature which didn't give anyone what we have been asking for: the ability to save and load games easily, at will, no strings attached, in the most complicated single players campaigns available. What I just heard here is that we will likely get the following at launch: "hey everyone, after 5-7 years, here is our basic first draft... it's EA, more to come". That the DC is going to launch in a half-baked state that many people might have anticipated seeing in 2021, not 2026 (or beyond?). If indeed that is the case, what that will broadcast to us is that there is very little interest, resource, and commitment from ED to harness the fidelity of DCS into the best flight simulation game the industry has seen. It will tell us that there is no misunderstanding from Enigma. I believe we need a transparent expectation setting, likely alongside a genuine and novel commitment from ED to a truly game-centric focus. The Dynamic Campaign carrot is more than just a carrot regarding the DC - it's an unspoken implication of the internal state of ED's "game" focus and an incentive to purchase modules now. Please, PLEASE tell me I am misreading this. Please tell us that the community, wondering what has taken so many years, will immediately cease to wonder upon launch and know exactly what we have been waiting for - know exactly where all those years went. Or will we get a basic launch that broadcasts "this is what we can produce in 5+ years"?

Flap deflection angle, It's also important to remember that the MiG-29 has adjustable flaps at the front. These aren't slats like the F-16. - front flap opening max angle = 20° - rear flap opening max angle = 25°

Yes I tried with and without it. The solution I have found: Keep clicking weapon release button very rapidly to empty out all the contents. Seems to work ok but the timing between releases can sometimes be imprecise if not doing it perfectly.

На мой взгляд это такая мелочь, цвет лампочек. Будем докладывать на посадке не "зелёные горят' , а "жёлтые горят" (если такой доклад вообще существует) Расскажите лучше о КОЛС действительно столько помех даже при температуре -40 и на больших высотах?