All Activity

Welcome The history about WW2: ED start make the first warbirds (P-51D, Fw-190D-9) on 2012 as iconics aircrafts as Flying Leyends, no make a dedicated environment to WW2. A 3rd party claimed RRG Studios, claimed a standalone product called Europe 1944 WW2, with plans about normandy 1944 map, WW2 assets, assets and 5 aircraft (Bf-109K-4, P-47, Spitfire Mk.XI, Fw-190A8, Me262 plus ED P-51D and Fw-190D-9) and build a KickStarted, claims about make them on 2-3 years with only a handred of bucks... and end on Bankrupt, abandom them. ED salved the project and take the rests, make the KS modules and the WW2 assets pack, meanwhile Ugra Media rescue Normandy 1944 (2.0 now), release some years aboy. By ED, only missing the Me262, by now, ED has on research and like make a propper simulation about a early jet. About ED after them: ED make the Mosquito FB.VI (on early access) to ETO and the Channel WW2 Map. Has building a F6F Hellcat (Expected release on End 2025 or Early 2026) and claim a A6M5 Zero module on a future, PTO WW2 Assets pack and has release free Marianas WW2 map to PTO. ED CEO Nick Grey (and The Fighter Collection), has claim to make Battle of Britain modules after PTO, as huricane and others, and expand ETO WW2 (has some ETO WW2 assets arround). About 3rd Parties, only 2 has claimed WW2 modules. Octopus-G (Russian 3rd party), has maked a I-16 Type 24, has building a La-7 and has claimed plans to make a Po-2 on WW2). Magnitude 3 has release a F4-U1 corsair module and PTO Units. By now, has no claimed other WW2 module. Ugra Media has expand Normady WW2 to the 2.0, expand them. By now, has no talked about other WW2 map. Other 3rd parties, has no claimed WW2 modules, map or assets. Polls has none required.

Given the J-8PP is a paper airplane and never saw service (or flew) it would be great it if you could give it a little more flexibility in the mission editor in terms of what ordinance it can carry so that mission designers can help match it with other Cold War aircraft in different scenarios. The J-8PP could stand in on Redfor in Cold War scenarios for planes like the Mig-23 but only if the weapon set is flexible (and not limited to late 80s/early 90s missiles only). The precedent for this would be for example the G91 devs planning on allowing Aim-9Bs even if the plane never successfully fired them IRL. So things like allowing R-3S (PL-2 proxy) and Aim-7E for early Cold War scenarios, R13M/M1 (PL-5B proxy) and Aim-7F for mid Cold War scenarios. I'm not for a second suggesting these are realistic loadouts but given how limited the plane set is in DCS, when it comes to PvP multiplayer scenarios we need as much flexibility as possible. Hoping Deka are open to this as it would massively help out in giving the J-8PP a home in as many Cold War scenarios as possible (rather than late Cold War/80s where its going to struggle against our late block F-16s/F-18s)

Hi, I am not seeing any issue here, can you attach your dcs log from a session where you try. If you are using unofficial mods remove them for any test. thank you

Will ED team finaly face the problem and try to solve this GIGANTIC problem of terrible edge visuals? @BIGNEWY?

Но это вертолёт, что само по себе значительно интереснее и оружия у него куча разнообразного и вообще предпочитаю наземку крабить от пвп устаёшь Я понимаю су30см, су25см3 или су35с был бы это хоть актуальная техника

Так и Ми-24П по сути не новый, современник того же МиГ-29. Даже круглосуточные возможности очень условные.

You're not the only one. I found that any IPD <64 I get a mechanical 'jam' or skip, like its not able to engage the gears to move the lenses, but anything above 64 it seems to move fine. I also wasn't blown away by the visuals or performance over the OG Crystal, but I'm going to stick with the super and hope it improves..

Миг29 сегодня такой устаревший самолёт, что особого интереса не вызывает. Как будто бы мой интерес к этой технике пропал в 20м году, когда выпустили ми24-один из лучших модулей дкс или вообще лучший. Круче все равно не будет) я больше интересуюсь су25 Отличный модуль, приятно летается и отлично выглядит. Даже взлёт посадка интересны. У меня на нём есть сбитые пвп игроки так-то. Было время, когда люди с радостью шли в бой с и16 из-за новизны впечатлений и их удавалось сбить. Сейчас только на лобовые идут, а тут у и16 всё довольно кисло) хотя 109й сбивается

None CH-47 can carry a M113, Vulcan, IFV or APC on sling, that is not realistic. In theory a CH-47 can carry some HMMVW or a 155mm artillery towed on Sling.

Just downloaded your version - amazing! Now we can really use the reventments and more in our "green" maps. Thanks a lot!

You may want to ask these questions on the Virtual Desktop Discord server, they’ll have all your answers. https://discord.gg/FTEcbPGUa8

Hello, If it is of any help, the COVERT positions of the MASTER knob do not influence the other, visible lights. Unlike in DCS, they are still to be set by the corresponding switches. Also, the A and B positions of the A-C knob can be programmed to 4 different patterns each. The COVERT positions of the MASTER knob are used to set the IR emitters only: COVERT A-C, switches the visible A-C light to the IR emitter. COVERT FORM, turns on the covert formation IR emitters. COVERT ALL, switches the A-C light to IR and turns on the formation IR emitters. For evidence, here is a link to the manual of a F-16C/D lights testing set from 2000. Revision is 2005. So, it fits perfectly into the timeframe of a 2007 USAF viper. https://imlive.s3.amazonaws.com/Federal%20Government/ID242537638455739803559945300096141041581/Test_Set_Operation_Manual.pdf The additional flash patterns for A & B position of the A-C knob can be found in that manual too. I guess you already know this document. If not, I hope this helps. Would love to see this implemented.

When you do, keep in mind that DCS’s wingmen don’t know the difference between ‘nails’ and ‘spike’, and will (incorrectly) call out ‘spike’ when it’s actually ‘nails’.

And if we also make a normal landing system so that the infantry sits inside and comes out with animation, it would be magical.

I am currently spending way too much time thinking about my entry into the pit.. Rather than measure twice, cut once... I am overthink x 1000, then more overthinking and some more overthinking. I also spend way too much time looking on the web for tomcat part ideas. I will do the pedestal by hand I think. The new part for the 3d printer turns up this week, so I can complete printing out as much as possible.

please remove all unofficial user mods and run a repair. Retry in a shorter track replay and also attach the dcs log from the session. thank you

thanks to both of you. I have some reading to do. Christian

Yes that’s what I thought. I asked because it won’t look as dark for those who use the default industry standard 2.2

there is a bug currently on the English cockpit with the language selection, it will be fixed in the next patch. thank you

I have no idea if this works (I don’t use a M$ account), but you could try using a little programme called HID Hide. I use that to prevent other games setting my flight sim peripherals as default “controller”. Basically you can make whichever peripheral you want invisible to all but the programmes you select yourself. I’ve been using it for years and years, and it works brilliantly for games etc.

I couldn't find any hint of a difference in russian docs either.

Great! Thanks! Thank you! Whether a mod pack asset will be added to DCS core is up to ED, you'll have to ask them about it.

Hi, as mentioned above the issue has been reported, as soon as there is free dev time for the issue it will be addressed but I can not say when that will be yet, we do not have infinite resources and tasks are assigned by the project managers. I have bumped the report internally. but please check your hardware, also check your long press is long enough. thank you

Looks pretty damn good ! Is that all plastic then ?

Yeah, sidewinders dropped with 3F (2018) if you exclude test aircraft.