All Activity

Sorry for the dumb question, but where exactly is the location of the file that we need to add that line???

The AN/ALR-69 Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) detects and identifies threat electronic signals within the C to J frequency bands, which range from approximately 0.5 to 20GHz. SA-22 Have more 30GHz

From Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A6M_Zero#A6M5_Type_0_Model_52]: "Some Model 21 and 52 aircraft were converted to "bakusen" (fighter-bombers) by mounting a bomb rack and 250 kg (550 lb) bomb in place of the centerline drop tank." It would be nice to get this as an option for added ground attack capabilities, considering it's unlikely for any more Japanese WW2 aircraft to be modelled in a near timeframe. This would also make the inevitable kamikaze missions more authentic as they used a similar or identical bomb rack with either a 250 kg or 500 kg bomb.

Wrong thread. Plenty of other threads for that.

You're attempt at being rude doesn't bother me . I'm too old for that Lol I could have just as easily shot down your request for the Philippines in the same way. Become a billionaire ? Easier said than done. Doing drugs ? Haven't done that since I was a youngster. Hang out on Twitter ? never had an account Giant ww2 team ? not necessary, add a few more people would be nice. At the rate technology is moving we may not have modern jets anymore in a few more years. Drones will be the thing. It will be mostly cold war and WW2 for DCS Imo.

Please introduce bombs "hanging" on the racks. Then capitalize it in bold letters in the patch notes that you introduce bomb hangs. Just to point the users back to the update patch notes.

I have been in awe of the Corsair since I was a kid. I was so happy to see it join the warbird stable in DCS. I bought the mod the first day it was available. I thought it was beautiful then and I still do. I wanted to love it, but I don't. The handling is not good. It flies like it's tail heavy. It just waddles around the sky. The roll rate is horrific, and it doesn't respond with any sense of urgency to the throttle. It feels reluctant to turn or to climb. The training missions are glitchy. And I have these random engine failures. It just stops, and for no apparent reason. I have every other DCS warbird mod and am happy with all of them. That being said I confess that I had my struggles with each of them. Like any machine, they each have their quirks and foibles that have to be understood and overcome. The high speed stall characteristics of P-51 for example. Anybody who flies it knows it will depart from flight with little warning and it sucks until you get a feel for the onset. But I don't see me getting a feel for the problems with the F4u. Every flight ends in frustration and disappointment. The mod seems fundamentally flawed to me, but I still want to love it and am hoping that Magnitude will keep improving it.

I don't know what your local costs are, but for me a 4TB NVMe costs more than 64GB 6000MHz DDR5 kit. And I can't "enjoy" those liveries since I don't even own those modules, the only time I will ever see them is if I happen to spawn right next to them. Let's say ED puts all liveries into a "free downloadable liveries" module. You having to click one extra checkbox is an incovenience? And to rid you of that great burden, everybody else have to buy bigger SSDs? Don't you think people would rather use that money to upgrade to their RAM, than get a bigger SSD to store useless liveries only to accomodate your laziness? Unless both of you have outdated specs in your signatures, it's funny that you think it's prudent to spend more on SSD than on RAM

If the issue is true, I think it will be fixed with the release of the FF Fulcrum

So forgive my ignorance of understanding this but; Dual SD10 pylon itself is 6.14, Each SD10 adds an additional 2.2, Meaning both pylons & all 4 sticks are a total value of 21.08, 21.08 @ 35k, burner, will get you to 1.12 over a 40nm span. Single SD10 pylon itself is 2.6 each, Each SD10 adds an additional 2.2, Both pylons, both sticks & 2 800L fuel tanks have a drag value of 21 even If I understand this correctly, 2 800L fuel tanks and 2 SD10s have a slightly less drag value than just 4 SD10s & their pylons or 1.08 more drag than 2 huge BRM pods? lol

Hey folks, I've been flying the Hook for about 2 weeks now and am really enjoying it. I am still having trouble landing though. My question is when I want to slow down and descend, what is my primary flight control? Do I adjust the cyclic to pitch up and then adjust the collective to slowly descend, or do I drop the collective and then adjust the cyclic? Or do you just do both at once? I can land ok now and I am much better at not getting into power settling but I can't really pick a specific spot and land there. Looking for a little advice on how to make this work please. Thanks!

Bei mir wurde das Win Update am 15.08.25 installiert , das große DCS Up Date anschließend am selben Abend . Bei mir läft alles einwandfrei , also sollte doch alles i.O. sein ?

Thank you, and sorry—I hadn’t fully understood the Easy Comm option. I’m sorry for wasting your time

Excuse me, in VR mode, I set the "combination shortcut key" to delete all points. However, when I press this shortcut key combination in the VR game, the points in the THEWAY window aren't deleted. How can I delete them?

Then I have no idea why it doesn't work, as long as you're using the correct TX of course. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

We have finally added our changelog for the current update.

I tried a 'cowl flaps closed' carrier landing to see if it really stopped the engine, as others have said. Air start, oil flaps open. MP 30, 2400 rpm. Speed 100 kt. Sure enough, the cyl temp needle kept rising and as soon as it touched the red line 260C, the engine seized. This of course is not what should happen. The red line is the upper limit for certain operations, not the self destruct line. So. I cracked the flaps open, enough to keep the temp in the blue. Oil is in the high blue.and after 17 mins into my 3rd landing, the engine seized. I'm at a loss to see why. .. F4Uengine seize.trk

Our changelog has been just added to last update. You can check it in DCS Changelog and updates 2025 thread. We apologize for the delay. DCS Mirage F1 by Aerges General: Cockpit livery selection was added to the module options. It returns the ability to use custom cockpit liveries. In particular the "Mirage F1 English Cockpit CE and EE version" user mod. Note that the mod contents should be modified by renaming 'default' folders to 'english'. Module options tooltips are 'localizable' now - they will be displayed in the interface language, given their localization (translation) for this language was done. Systems: Fixed jettison buttons guards not reacting on mouse in F1BE. Fixed Optical Sight font looking blurred when its brightness is reduced. DCS: C-101 Aviojet by AvioDev Fixed conflicting dual seat airbrake control. Note that the rear seat always has the control priority

This is how DCS works already. But in many cases that default livery is bright metal. So it’s a bit of an exploit online being able to remove your opponents camouflage if they had selected that.

They are and will continue to be even more cheaper per GB as time goes on. Agreed. Relying on cloud is just another failure point that a proper optimization on assets can save the sim from having it.

В свое время читал многие руководства по ранним мигам и сухим ... ну и логика работы прицела подсказывает ! НО-РС пушка или ракета; С-Б стрельба или бомбометание; СС-ГИРО не подвижная сетка или подвижная марка прицела (используется как раздельно так и совместно? CC- еще может называться Сопроводительно- заградительная Стрельба) ! кстати режимы прицела не одно и тоже показывают соответственно в режиме "Воздух-Земля" а так же при захвате цели РЛС и без захвата, все эти нюансы описаны в руководстве по конкретному типу ...

Thanks for the super quick response, LG! I'm loving the campaign and I appreciate the work you do.

Thanks for the clarification

The easiest option for them would be the MiG-21bis (Izdelie 75A) Lazur, but they won't do that either, so there's no point in hoping for anything new.

Totally agree, most of the suggestions here will inconvenience those that have an appropiate amount of storage, in order to allow an unknown quantity of users to employ a smaller SSD drive.