All Activity

buuhuu. I couldnt fly it

I'm still waiting too.

UP! РУД 24,5к Педали 28к

In fact, back to 25.4.1 and it's OK.

Just wanted to stop by and say thank you for this mod, looks like a lot of hard work has taken place.

Only if we get more period naval assets they retired from us service in 1993. Not saying no just saying it would be awesome for a cold war environment

I am, of course, joking

Mine is #191499 Purchased new from 'The Gamesmen', Sydney Australia in July 2025.

Ooo fiesty. Some people don't like buying products that haven't been reviewed. Did you know that?

Right, it's dawning on me. [emoji4] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Thxxx for sharing ! Unknown airport = Wiesbaden AB (ETOU)

Has somebody lately tried efm 2.1.0 + latest hotfixes from github. Just compiled/ merged it into my computer. lets see what happens

I think nowadays with the help of AI models you can pull off most translations, keeping whatever military tone and style you want. I just completed mission 6 today, what a great mission! :0 I was exhausted after the 2nd landing. So fun!

C-101 +It is super stable, even at very slow speeds. Best out of the three for strafing runs. +Fuel for days. -Very under powered, especially if you load it down with fuel. ---It has the absolute worst sound in game. It is borderline unplayable IMO unless you mod the engine growl sound file. L-39 +Does not make your ears bleed. -Has a long standing cockpit model graphics bug. MB-339 +Does not make your ears bleed. -Way too unstable. The smallest stick inputs and the nose bounces all over the place. It's like driving a car with bad struts. Not great for gunnery.

And other 3rd parties? We still dont know.

Normally you have to do nothing.... so we are wondering that @Calabronehas a problem.

2 things I have upgraded which gave me better performance in DCS was 32 to 64 gig memory, and a 2080 to a 4080. The one thing that IMO didn't give me any noticeable performance gain in DCS was upgrading my CPU, (but it did in other games).

Have you tried dogfighting the other planes like BF109 or FW190 ? Max speed in a straight and level flight is nothing. I'm not a rookie, I have years of experience dogfighting in IL-2.

I think it's pretty clear it doesn't apply to any of the Razbam Modules, seeing as the following is in the first post by 9L: "All modules continue to function 'as is' and despite not receiving any access to source codes or cooperation from Razbam and its external developers, Eagle Dynamics will do its best to ensure that these modules continue to function in 2.9.X.". I would take from that statement that ED does not have access to the source code of any Razbam module, they plainly spell it out.

You'll not have that money for the 5-6 years it'll take to get into a decent shape if it's undercooked so there is absolutely an opportunity cost.

I tried the AN M64 bomb today with a AN M116 5 sec tail fuse and nose plug, dropped from about 300' and it exploded on contact. This fuse is designed to be dropped from mast height, say 100', hence the long delay of 5 or 11 seconds. Something wrong here! ..

oh, really. I just didn't know. Will add it later!

Taking in count ED didnt even expand the Chinook new cargo limited features to the rest of the helicopters, one can tihink is not a top priority.

I just built a system that I'm still in the process of setting up. I went with 96GB of g.Skill RAM and an ASUS TUF RTX 5070 TI OC Edition graphics card. I haven't overclocked anything yet, but I ran a baseline on the graphics card and got a maximum frame rate of 214 with an average of 172 FPS. If you'd like the details on the rest of the system I built, I'm happy to provide them.

Surprised, it wasn't mentioned yet: The A-4 counts to the light attack aircrafts as well. Edit: Ok - perhaps not a typical COIN aircraft...