All Activity

True. I have searched a little bit and since on the simshaker shop the actual product is not available I had a look at the next level hf8 pro. my fingers are itching. Hey thanks, now I found the link in the shop. Very uncomfortable shop... Is the jetpad the holy grail? Over 322 EUR is a lot and the HF8 pro comes around 280 EUR. So is there a reason to go for the russian high prize product instead?

Difference in RCS might be because AGM-84D has its engine inside of the main body, while here you have it on the outside pod which for is not stealthy at all.

There is a shop button to order a jetpad. I just said that the software for dcs is free and you need additional software for other sims. Edit: https://simshaker.com/hardware/jetpad/

Sadly I think cfrag is taking a break due to recent changes to dcs core.

At least the monitor should be mounted to the moving part of the contraption. So fixed relative to the seat.

I have Q3 but have not used Q3S. It's not only the res difference though. https://www.roadtovr.com/quest-3s-quest-3-quest-2-specs-compared/ It's also pancake lenses and 2 separate LCDs that gives you more clarity, bigger "sweet spot" and fov. The question was about jetseat or similar hardware. btw: I miss Rift S days when I just run DCS, put on the headset and it works. Now I have to juggle 1 minute before I can run DCS: turn on the headset, wait, grab the controller, enable link, wait, select desktop view, run DCS.

Dude you totally need the Hornet Grip! This crazy setup and then a Viper Grip??? A friend of mine also had that issue with the F16 ICP dobber. He fixed it himself, don´t know if he had contacted teh customer support at all, but it seems to be a weak point and I admit they allready know at WW. So the reaction is absolute nonsence. Very bad decission making from a economic point of view.

I think that your body & mind gets mixed signals if you use a motion rig with a monitor.

@wct24 You need to wait 1 day and 14 hours for the Oasis driver to be released, before you can use it. I suggest listening to some music while you wait: Let's see if the WMR headsets will live forever.

Wow...not what I would expect, simply because some of the Pimax Super's demo videos showed crystal-clear night flying, albeit in other simulations.

I am in the same situation, still awaiting my headset and absolutely no software installed other than base simulators (DCS, BMS, MSFS); that said, this is promising info. Thanks!

https://simshaker.com/ software for DCS is free, but a couple other games need the wings or wheels software to function properly. But there are also a couple of other manufacturers out there. You can take a look into the hardware section of the forum for more information.

Yeah I don't understand it. For some everything's fine. I don't have a fresh Win11 install (but it's basically stock settings) and I have both Meta Oculus and Virtual Desktop installed. Might be it.

I cant tell because i have no comparisson. But in my opinion the quest 3 has a minimum resolution. Reading small details on the middle MFD in the hornet ist barely satisfying. I would go for a Cristal super but its too expansive. So I went for quest 3 cause in my calculation it was the best effordable value. And I am quite satisfied. But yeah pixels only substitute by more pixels.

That more like it !

Hello, I asked above about the difference between the Quest 3 128GB and 512GB and I got the answer. Now I find that it's Quest 3 S and not Quest 3 Because I noticed a difference in resolution both in 4K but with the Quest 3 better resolution than the Quest 3S. For those who have Quest 3, is the difference in resolution between the two Quests clearly visible or barely visible? Please help me.

It starts exactly with this as you can then argue, we got X, which is not accurate, for the F-18, when do we get Y, which would also be not accurate. Mounting it is one thing, employing it is the other thing. And no, you cannot just copy the avionics of the A-10C2 over. You are also requesting time travel to put a 2012 weapon into the year 2005, that's my reasoning, which is also your reasoning with the mission example. It doesn't force you to play like I would. It forces you to play like you would, with a GBU-54 on an F-18. Like I said, arguments like these can be dragged into infiinity. ED is modelling a specific timeframe. If they wouldn't, they would have to implement various updates and changes and other things. That way the amount of work gets absolutely bloated. Just live with their decision of the F-18 being a 2005 aircraft.

Same in IL2 at night but it's not a game breaker, so meh.

does anyone know if this will be overhauled for the dynamic campaign?

By hitting Left alt +F1 we get a hud only view. I would like more options in this for replay. By hitting the same command several times. You could cycle between 1. the one that is now(hud and screens) 2. Full screen hud no screens) 3. And full screen screen (cycling between left and right. This would make my life so much easier when making vidoes. As of now if I want a large screen of the MFD or other screen. I have to either move the F1 view in the cockpit and zoom in on the screens(this won't work in the Apache as the monocle is superimposed in the F1 in replay unless you turn it off during the mission. Or I have to use the left alt + F1 view and try and edit out the the rest of the screen causing lower resolution And at other times it would be nice to just have a clean hud view to make hud cam views.

Nobody. How could we know how you feel? Nobody mentioned you at all. I did make a general point on the back of your comment: endless entitlement is not the way forward for the community or developers. If you take that personally, maybe ask questions of yourself rather than us.