All Activity

It is normal. It just covers a range of few clicks. It would be pretty hard to set the lamp to neutral if it covered only exactly one click wouldn’t it?

Pre designation doesn’t matter, all weapons can be employed without pre designation. All pre designation does is correct for wind and target movement. I have no idea why manual omits this and confuses everyone into thinking it’s something else I have only gotten bombs to drop accurately in CCIP, you have to look for when bomb fall line starts to rise above the 12 degree limit. I find CCRP so innacurate as to be worthless

Agreed. If turning radar off then on really helps, maybe even every 10th radar cycle.

Potrebbe essere il vr? a me si è bloccato un paio di volta

Guys, I have a problem, the A-4 doesn't go to the catapult to take off because it keeps turning to get to the takeoff area, when this wasn't supposed to happen.

The reference number on the top could be used to look it up in the UK national archives. This sort of thing is pretty universally released after 25 years. As a note they don’t edit the documents and don’t cross off things like confidential or secret like in the US. just based on age the archives would release something with just a confidential rating but the archivist would not allow access if there was an exception.

MiG-29s that made their way into the Luftwaffe after the reunification of Germany were in fact converted to imperial gauges and english labels. Not sure if there were other export nations that used imperial right away. In any case, it‘s not an artificial feature of DCS. (Not sure if the HUD was converted as well as it is the case in DCS if you chose imperial.)

Hey, I discovered your script very recently and it's truly amazing ! Superb job indeed ! Many thanks

I would really love clarification for this. Becuase as far as I can tell in my testing, the leading edge flaps are down all the time with both settings. And nothing I could do could make them go up in “takeoff” flaps. And the LEF only have two settings, down or up.

One of the 80 MiG-29 manuals I read recently, honestly probably combat employment or L-18 Atill won’t show us exactly where the target is! Unless it’s set up for the one of three interception methods that sends you straight to target and your 100% nose on, just like now with radar or IRST lock

Не работает IFF в мультиплеере, все контакты отображаются как вражеские.

They can remove this if the Laszlo/Lazur is finally in, so you actually get usable information.

I believe what was meant was that this was already discussed and cleared up on the Ru side. I read the same thing on a separate English forum that there is a misconception among us users about the flap panel, ie. people think its 3 buttons that only do 2 settings versus the reality of it being 3 buttons with 3 different settings as per some Mig-29 manual or documentation (Up, TO Flap + TO Scheduled Slats, LDG + LDG Scheduled Slats rather than what some assumed was just Flaps Up or Down with an unused middle button). It's more a comment on how the misconception above has been explained on the Ru side, perhaps worth making a note of this in the manual later down the road as it is both a very relevant system and of course just interesting technical knowledge (if its correct of course)!

Overall the JF-17 is in a pretty good state, but it can be improved in some areas. There's almost always problems with the following: *TGP *802AKG+MIL *Any type of smart munitions and glide weapons I guess it's difficult for the developers to fix, but it's always an issue with one or more of the items above. Long term they need to figure out a way to fix it and make it robust enough that it stays fixed. On a secondary note, sound can be improved. Mainly voices and warnings where there's some sound of mouse-clicks of the recordings etc. It a minor issue but I've heard several friends complain about sound quality. Sound is a big part of DCS World aircraft and first impressions matter.

E il g.91 Ma non mi avrete mai, non lo chiamerò mai Gina

Thank you @CaptHawk for keeping on top of testing this for us all! I check in each patch and still no joy. @BIGNEWY would you be able to let us know if this is reported for the team (I'm wondering if the reported was for the original issue and something that is believed to be sorted since the DCS 2.9.17.11733 patch) Really appreciate all the work Thank you, Martin

I set Syria to 1991 and can see the RSBN car. Is your DCS updated to v2.9.20.15010? Or do you have any mods installed, as they may be causing this issue.

@ThorBrasil The newly released Grim Reapers tutorial is really good, you might want to have a look. There is no doubt bombing in the Fulcrum takes lots of skill, but atleast the framework and functionality is described very well below!

Is it fine to quote this document as a reference in my historic 29 flights? Is it still confidential, and how do I make sure I do not breach the British laws? The reason I ask is: Eastern German and Yugoslav 29s are roughly the same age. It appears the degradation of electronics did proceed in similar tempo in both air forces. Asking since this document proves British were aware already in 1997 that the aged fulcrums had serious problems. E.g. first signs that war imminent were mid-1997, with Autumn 1998 being marked with huge NATO demonstrative actions over Albania.

Hi All, I know this has been a problem for years and I'm sure there is an existing topic for it but I cannot for the life of me find it - with the recent introduction of the NS430 with the MiG-29 there has been renewed interest in it's availability on servers. Reproduction: * Map Option Allies only * Place 1 friendly and 1 hostile farp * Open NS430 * Navigate to Nearest Airport * Observe list of both friendly and hostile farps. This is a problem on servers like mine where we make use of player deployed dynamic farps for offensive operations and wish for them to be hidden. Please find attached track: NS430-Hostile-Farp.trk Thanks, Martin

Hi @wired521, thanks you for your reply. Negative...I forced it in 2025 but with Combined Joint Task (RED) I have just category ARMOR. With Russia, under Support and Logistics, I don't find anything. Any solution?

1983 is a bit early for MIG-29 over CW Germany. Unless you're aiming for a scenario where a couple of the very first Soviet aircraft is put into action. From what I can find the MIG-29 was declared fully operational around 1985 and East German Air Force received MIG-29 between 1988-1989.

Damn it. You're the kid who reminds the teacher they didn't assign homework. PLEASE keep this bug!

Does it state otherwise? Because just because it doesn't explicitly state that it can't doesn't mean much. It'd be worth mentioning if it didn't work. So far, I've seen it mentioned either in other countries' manuals or in uncertain terms.