All Activity

Would it be helpful if @Someone from the ASC guys (pun intended) clarified whether they signed contracts that prevent them from being another VEAO or RB in the worst case?

Why are you so insistent about "official use only" information? I don't know of any company that puts its internal affairs on public display. We are not subcontractors even.

The people who happily throwed money at 'Red Flags' Zambrano for years are now here, on the birth place of a new 3rd party Dev. trying to teach us something. Pay attention!

Good to hear! Pardon my lack of knowledge, but what i Pimax CPR? For now I am sticking with previous version of Pimax Play with Quadviews there turned off, eye tracking ON. And then I use mbucchia's Quadviews and TallyMouse Quadviews companion app instead. The performance and clarity in DCS is amazing with these. I know Pimax Play latest version gives some more control of over Quadviews settings, but from the screen shots, not as much as Tallmouse companion app.

There was nothing left out of that, 'new third-party agreements' by definition would not include existing third-party agreements. Unless you think the Oxford Dictionary is conspiring with ED. Hey wait a second, Nick Grey is English...

10-15 лет назад мы были моложе и другие были интересы.

Go get the mod, do the start-up, fly and try an assault landing in a tennis court. See what you miss, watch in the videos what is already done. Just give a new 3rd party a chance. The Razbam funeral has been going on for years in the licensed-third-party-projects/RAZBAM section.

I mean it'll be like 50% off on it's release out of EA by 2031 if you can wait that long. It only took three years from announcement to EA.

Я думаю, что энтузиасты на еду себе и без Геркулеса смогли бы заработать. Плюс возможно, если он хорошо продастся, появится AC-130.

How convenient. And who do you think made that stuff confidential in the first place? Ultimately ED controls which information they decide to share with the public.

Excellent news!!! In the virtual aviation museum that DCS is becoming the UK aviation industry heritage is massively underrepresented. It produced so many groundbreaking designs and iconic aircraft. Especially with the release of the CW Germany map, many of the cold war era jets would fit perfectly. Looking forward to the release.

God blass you

Wtih radar on, currently it can pick up targets to 40nm! I dont' know if this is correct. But it surely does. a2a_acm_boresight_mode_issue.miz

Stuff that's confidential, what's so difficult to understand about all of this?

100% this. We need a throttle with analog stick, analog slider, latching 3pos, latching/momentary 3pos, analog rotary, encoder rotary, selection of hats and buttons. At that point you can configure it for almost anything.

Уважаемые специалисты, столкнулся со следующей ситуацией. Цель: хочу при подключении наземного питания радиообмен с РП. Мои действия: 1. Прошу подключить наземное питание. Включаю все АЗС(кроме относящихся к вооружению), тумблеры Аэродромное питание (2шт.), Проверка оборудования, Ток 115В(ручн), Связная РС. Настраиваю радиостанцию - РП - отвечает. 2. Делаю всё тоже самое, что и в П.1, за исключением того, что включаю только АЗС, относящиеся к радиостанциям - РП - не отвечает. 3. Делаю всё тоже самое, что и в П.2 после неответа со стороны РП, включаю оставшиеся АЗС из П1 - РП не отвечает. Т.е. в итоге в П.3 включены все АЗС и тумблеры из П1, в итоге в П1 РП выходит на связь, а в П3 РП на связь не выходит. Вопрос в следующем: что я делаю неправильно и как сделать так чтобы РП работал. На каком-то видео вирпил переговаривался с РП(видео снова пока найти не удалось) в "холодном" вертолёте с "парой" включенных АЗС, относящихся к радиостанциям и РП с ним вёл радиообмен. В общем хочется повторить то же что я видел на том видео.

Лет 10-15 назад кто то божился что DCS чисто "по понятиям" боевой симулятор и всякие транспортники это фи, а паксовозы так и вообще ка-ка. Вот только кушать всё равно хочется не зависимо от "идеи"... Здравствуй АЫЧеПрепарыче и прочий ЭКСплейн!

Как по мне в оригинале тесновато в кабине. Даже когда я был молод и худ было чувство как будто сейчас локти заденут что нить на бортах около кресла. И только взявшись за РУС это уходило. В модуле как раз это чувство. Не боишься зацепится локтями за АЗСы и прочее всякое торчащее из бортов.

Hi Saxman, I am sure you're right. However, just sharing what works for me after watching several Royal Navy carrier Ops video's and practicing the FAA curved approach

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/changelog/release/2.9.17.11733/

Thanks, yep..the real thing sounds about wright... In DCS the lower pitch and longer sound is what i meant. It can't be the JFS because that would be way to early in the startup cycle. Also the green RUN light remains on during the winddown sound. So the JFS is still running. Thanks for the reply

Makes you wonder what other important bits of information ED leaves out of their press announcements.

I found the problem and will post everything tomorrow. Everyone, please sit tight.

Q. We see the US style of AAR are we getting everyone else's method of AAR as I note there is a khaki green Albert parked which would suggest RAF. Also would this indicate that the Dynamic Campaign is ever closer so requiring logistics?

I have a bug with the pod and i presume BRM1, when i use the pod in Snowplow, it goes to 41nm (350+in track2) (weird i have a laser ranging more than 21nm) and 1 hour or 11hours of my cockpit. i can't move the pod, even if i try the unlock or the lock bouton. If i am correct, a unlock button action need to align the plane and the pod forward, and when i use BRM 1 the pod must show the impact point of rockets. If i try SLAV, all is correct. If i change weapon, in track 2 a gbu12, all is ok. bug pod.trk bug pod 2 .trk