All Activity

Just to clarify: as the thread so far has shown, a lot of the global C-130 population is 'varying shades of monochrome gray plus a roundel'. Any word on what else there is to expect or planned?

Yeah, I'd take that subreddit in particular with a grain of salt. The regular Hoggit community is already salty enough on their own, but "DCS Exposed" is next-level salt levels.

Of course, absolutely not! I wasn't clear it seems. I left out the important parts. If you can find out exactly when it happens, like starting DCS, starting a mission etc. Then you can provide that to the devs, and they might be able to find out why. I have heard about others losing their controls settings, not snapviews. Oh, and BTW. The "Save snapviews" checkbox in the settings haven't been unchecked by chance? Cheers!

Can someone help me? Whatever I do, the SAMP/T remains inactive. Is there a special manipulation to do?

I wish I could assist but I have been playing ITJ on the server with the latest version we released and have not encountered any issues. Flew last night, but did not record. One thing I have changed though is I turn off my antivirus/spyware now when I fly DCS. I noticed it was causing the performance issues. I only turn it off when flying on DCS though. I would recommend opening in the mission editor and taking out the IDX to start with. Then maybe disable spyware/antivirus if it persists. I hate to say it, but this is the problem we run into playing a mod heavy mission. Especially with every new update. I know the last update that reverted back to the previous version fixed a lot of issues with mods and missions. You may give it another shot and see if anything has changed. I wish ED @Wags @NineLine would consider making @Eight Ball Eight Balls VAP pack an official addition to DCS. It is stellar from the AI perspective and has really provided some much needed assets to DCS.

You keep pointing at ED's statements But has RB told you why they aren't getting paid? We would be much more open to objectivity towards RB if they actually had a plausible defense, something which ED did put forward Now, you CHOOSE not to believe ED and try to paint that belief as gospel, but you show us NOTHING to argue in RB's defense

As in a "Digital combat simulator", I'd buy the "C-130 Gunship/Spooky" This edition has Truck sim vibes and feels weird! I bought MS flightsim through the years, but since I got into DCS I don't fly it much. I understand the value of logistics in an armed conflict, but this is a big, (boring) "WUT?"

Same here. In the other hand, historically on how ED has been introducing core features, a CSAR core update would come with a Black Hawk module. ...I'm of course being hopeful.

C ИИ и вправду беда, даже во времена Lock on такого небыло...

Thanks.. Yes, I always make a copy, and the file SnapViews.lua is anyway always in my file history. But this does not explain WHY my saved snapviews sometimes get erased / resettet / reverted to defaults without any intervention from my part. Does really nobody else have this issue? By all means I am not inventing it, and I am neither a computer newbie or a DCS one......

By Christmas present I would think it's the removal of MiG19P, AV8B, F-15E and Mirage-2000C as DCS World moves towards 3.0? Yes it kind of sucks, but it is a definitive conclusion. There are many interesting new modules in the pipeline; MiG-29, C-130, MiG-17, F-15C, F-35, F-104, F-100 etc. so hopefully some of those can fill the void left behind. ED should also look into providing additional free content, because removal of the Razbam modules will lead to an absolute s-storm from the DCS community, possibly hurting sales.

I certainly agree with that speculation. But if ED doesn't take the opportunity to do some core work about how CSAR missions work, I'll most likely give it a pass.

Training 6 Reported Training 7 I didnt have much issue with this one. Training 8 Reported, Depression seems broken as you cant set the first number past 1. Training 9 Same as 8, with the Depression not working right it seems these wont work right. Training 13 No issue here taking off, this one might just take some practice. Training 14 Reported

In all fairness, their modules are mostly average because there was a time, not so long ago, when one could argue that most modules available were theirs. In a way you could say they defined the average.

ok, gotcha, so this 'movement' can then only be observed/felt while traveling at speed, and not on the ground, i.e. essentially a change to the spring center force. Well, I fly the 190A and D9 all the time and use the elevator trim to adjust for fuel changes and I never felt this 'change' in the Rhino FFB... and the spring center force comes from DCS, so I doubt it's Rhino's fault.. Headscratcher...

Yet oddly enough, all the evidence says thats exactly what happened, huh...something you seem to not want to acknowledge because even though its the narrative that practically explains it all 100%, you dont want to believe it because it goes against "your team". Dont care; one of these days you're going to have to acknowledge the fact that Razbam isnt all that great a company you think they are. Or you can continue BS'ing yourself and VVV

There's a lot of pics and word about cargo drops and such. But not really seeing much involving dropping things like Lav's or especially infantry. Is this not including paratrooper drops on release?

Maybe Santa Claus will bring us a Christmas present. Hopefully, it would be an official, permanent, final, and concluding resolution to this ongoing issue.

never said they did.

Problem is that unless both side corroborate the info, then we just have a he said she said. I am not sure why this is hard to understand. And if one side doesn't, then you just get people fighting over their favorite side, and you achieve nothing. So waiting on a solution, one way or another, is the one way to go.

The Kamchatka Peninsula, extended to Magadan in Mainland Russia would make a great area of operation. Airfields, sub base, Sam & mobile ICBM sites (time for the RT-2PM2 Topal-M?). Volcanos, mountains and lots of sea.

Sometimes I think that if the module makers left some of the "simpler" stuff to a few selected community members, these would be able to: fix missions for them (faster than the module maker would), add missing bindings options, or even add stuff to the manual. And everybody would be happy. Of course, everything would still need to be approved, which is SOME work, but it's often much easier to just approve "looks good to me" stuff than to do it - or even start doing it, especially when the core members are overloaded.

Of course, Ron and his brother himself have been posting on social media for many years (almost since the days of the AV-8B) that they were working closely with the FAE on the A-29... and they are going to do it in DCS World (which you definitely need the SDK), and if they themselves said there was a "professional/military" version, you need the "military" version of DCS World for a professional product... and on top of that they claimed that when they finished it, they were going to make the DCS World version for us. Whoever doesn't want to see it, let them not see it, but they are the first ones who have given "wings" to this matter. Let's not even talk about the "famous" image Ron posted of a model of the A-29 for the "military" DCSWorld.

Btw: the drone is also kind of a submarine. You can dive under water, emerge and fly again

hello. do you still have a \Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\config\Input folder? within that folder there are folders for each aircraft. within that folder there are folders for each controller. you can either follow this guide i made or input the configurations within DCS https://pcwiseman.com/downloads_files/DCS_New_Computer.pdf