All Activity

It was definitely the amount of menu entries... Had to rearrange some mission flows to fix. My estimate is the the dedicated server supports only between 10 and 20% of the total menu items supported by the client.

Reshade is actually a nice software, that quietly sits in the back if unused without eating performance. And with a single keystroke does its thing. You CAN however get lost in the rabbit hole of turning to many knobs and adding too many filters…. and eventually, depending on what you are doing, it CAN add up to eating a couple of fps. My conclusion for reshade is „less is more“.

No, Im saying ED isnt paying Razbam because they're using their SDK in a manner they arent supposed to...using it for one of EDs potential customers for a profit behind ED's back. A govt contract. Im saying if Razbam's modules were top quality, they could probably get away with small things like that...and lets face it: their modules are about average. Not above, not below. About what is expected of you if you punch a clock every single day. Just...never completed, its like the gravy train that rolls on and on and on and on

Not really sure what you are saying here. Are you claiming that ED refused to pay Razbam over buggy modules? And not sure what the government contract bit is about either.

the last place on earth for accurate information would be reddit with blue sky being a very close second.

It almost always is. You know why? Because everyone loves money. Employers do not like BS, even more so if your product is buggy half the time and unfinished with no estimated time of completion. The only other time Ive ever seen this kind of BS running rampant and getting away with it are with government contracts...and considering a possible government contract is what supposedly brought this issue on tells me everything I need to know.

I'm familiar with cases where people followed the contract and yet were not paid, both near me, and from the news. The claim that following a contract means that you always get paid is thus false. And I added 'in general' to my comment to clarify that I was talking about the general situation, not specifically ED & third party developers.

There were at least 2 more such bases.

IDK, but maybe tgere is a way to make a feedback to AMD for this kind of issue.

Better to post a track and the mission then people will be able to help instead of recreating the scenario. Cheers! PS: Your text is in black, not auto. Makes it "impossible" for us dark theme users to read it, without switching themes or selecting the text.

I managed to get past Mission 4 without generator/anti-ice problems

I decided to give it a go, and Indeed with very subtle changes the results are quite good. On top of the dehaze and desaturate I checked the option with new white/black values (gamma correction I believe it's called). I believe I can get it to work in a way that pleases me, thanks for the recommendation

Hey folks, I just wanted to share this should anyone else find themselves having this issue. It turns out SRS has its own volume control outside of DCS. It was wierd that my communications with the tanker etc were very loud and I couldn't hear my teammates. Might be obvious to smarter folks, but it baffled me for a few days as I don't get to play much. Figured I'd put it out there. So if you're having this issue, adjust the volume within the external SRS app. Fly well! Master of the Obvious

After you pressed both pedals, and pulled the parking brake handle, are you releasing the brake pedals at the same time? If they are not released together and evenly, the parking brake will not engage.

This is already requested internally, thanks!

Yup, the control surface is free-floating on the hinge and just aligns itself so that pressure on the top and bottom are equal. If you want to trim the nose up, the trim tab on the elevator actually moves DOWN, which causes more pressure underneath the elevator, lifting it up until the aerodynamics are balanced again, and now you have a little bit of up elevator to pitch the nose up. The control cables go from the yoke/stick to the elevator, so when that elevator takes a new position it pulls the stick along as well to a new center point. Hope that makes sense Note, things are different when it’s fly-by-wire. But we don’t worry much about that in Warbird threads

Yeap... it would be cool but its not an easy task

shoot, i'm upgrading and doing firmware right now. Knew I should have checked here first. I have PCL, so who knows... I use openxr and mbuccia software on the side, not thru pimax play. So, interested to see if those are still working and connected. About to try DCS....

The free version of the editor is already out since June last year. You will find the link once you do a free trial and then you can cancel the trial without cost. The free version stays usable without subscription.

Bravo-Uniform-Mike-Papa

Yeah, I will not be able to touch G.91 till MB-339 gets fixed. I am curious about G.91 though but will wait and see how the situation goes.

It's coming. We just don't know the scope/size of at as the only screenshots shown has been buildings in Venice.

could you explain this a little further? my mind melts when it comes to messing with files

The fact that a certain Reddit account is still considered a reliable source is laughable... the same one that has never bothered to provide any proof of what it publishes, like a good tabloid... (and that tried to get me into trouble). Just try to dig up certain dead bodies from time to time, because you have to keep feeding the bait.

Know what kind of drives you want/need and lookup the Block Diagram of the mainboard you choose AND understand it. Without knowledge, the Diagram tells you nothing. It's not the CPU or the chipset that defines how PCIe lanes are switched and routed, it's the board and it's Bios, and many differences are among boards with the same chipset. For example, I can run 4 NVMe at 4x without sacrificing GPU bandwidth, THEREFOR I had to give up 2 of 6 Sata and a PCIe slot. I knew I wont need another card but I want multiple I/O drives. Others may favor even more drives and are willing to sacrifice GPU as they use iGPU, so there are another 16 lanes and Bifurcation options.... you just need to know first what you want and THEN look for the board that has THAT layout that doesnt close doors but keeps them open. edit: regarding CPU ...and why would you choose the 9900X ? For gaming it doesnt make any sense, just for productivity if you need all those cores for certain work. I would aim for 9800X3D or less money for 9800X or 9700X even 9600X. Given the 5070ti, all those will max out the GPU with ease. With AM5, you can upgrade to another CPU in 2-3 years, not so with Intel sockets. * just building 9 PC's....didnt even think of considering Intel for 1 second. All Ryzen 9600X based Office rigs