All Activity

I am aware of the underlying logic, but at what frequency does this happen? Obviously, tens of times a second. In an ECM environment, the radar has to work longer at peak and sustained power in order to obtain a target. Again, how does it affect the electronics for the duration required? It is true that west has had more AWACS than east (afterall, US is the nation that requires a fully mobile force in order to virtually go anywhere (oceans on both sides of the continent)). That said, GCI was available way before AWACS, and US never had anywhere near the datalink/intercept capabilities that Soviets had. It's a pretty major capability to be able to infercept a target based on GCI telemetry, with your own radar in passive mode. It gets even worse, when you know that R-27T/ET can get you at BVR ranges, and that, covertly. That's a DCS/open source peculiarity where west discloses more. While I agree, that it is a much later iteration of a F-15 (C, not A - same aa F-16 btw...), I still do know for a fact that it will be morw difficult to learn and operate. While more automated electronics are in place, with realistic settings (radar, HOTAS, generally cockpit), you'll have to better understand the aircraft you fly in order to utilize it. That goes for use of onboard systems, that goes for radar competence and what works where and how. F-14 has a pretty good radar for its time, yet, being proficient at using it requires you to dedicate yourself to that rear seat as if it was a separate module itself. I haven't come across anyone who has been proficient with it yet. Same with AH-64D, surprisingly not as popular of a module as one would think. Why? - because it's too advanced for the common head to wrap around. F-15 with ASM, should be very much that. You have a decent amount of capability, but bringing it to good use, is not a point-and-click exercise. (Some westeners are surprised at how advanced MiG-29 is in its systems, and seek a simplification (FC3) already. Good luck with F-15 and some 34 HOTAS bindings x3 (Air/Ground/Cruisr) alone...).

Please let me know if you need more details

I have to agree. It feels quite sterile as it is. The F4E is amazing with parts wobbling and moving around inside the cockpit. From the videos the very least should be the mirrors shaking and the sun sheild above the hud repeater flexing. Ed has done it with the Apache so I was hoping there would be something on this Mig.

It happens here as well, amongst other things!

В связи с переходом на девайсы Moza, продаю некоторые устройства Virpil: База: VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Base Ручка 1: VPC Constellation ALPHA Prime Grip Ручка 2: VPC MongoosT-50 CM2 Grip Адаптер крепления: VPC Desk Mount Adapter - МT-50CM3 Base Чехол: VPC Flightstick Dust Cover Всё в полной комплектации и в прекрасном состоянии. Есть потёртости в некоторых местах базы и второй ручки. Родные упаковки есть только у базы и ручки 1 - Альфа Прайм, на остальное подберу надёжную упаковку. Продаю комплектом за 50% от стоимости новых за 45000р. Вторая ручка - МонгустСМ2 и чехол считай в подарок. Дополнительные фото и видео работы устройства по запросу.

I was going to post the exact same thing. Otherwise, one need to write down the whole com plan on sheet of paper while preparing the mission. Realistic, but someone else in the squadron can do that, right ?

Nope, i'm not thinking about SA page. At least on OFP 21X there is L&S BE position at bottom right of the radar page and i wish DCS jet would have that too, among other more recent OFP version things.

В в/ч в наличии документация которая разрабатывалась в КБ на основании требований тех же ОСТов и ГОСТов, только скомпонованная в РТО и РЛЭ где более доступным языком расписано, что, как, кому и на каком этапе делать при эксплуатации конкретной техники, а для доведения техники до требований ТУ кроме разных видов подготовки, существует огромное количество работ в том числе по хранению, налёту, регламентных, при переводе на "летнюю-зимнюю" эксплуатацию в том числе и разные виды ремонтов....

Ну а касаемо ЗРК Хок, вроде есть же полно различной литературы как этот ЗРК отображается на "Березе" и какая индикация при каких случаях бывает ! вот картинка ,тут правда при работе станции РЭБ но все же ...

там ползунок законтрен механически ,а кнопка нет...

Until DC is available on MP, my Virtual Squad will pass. There is a point for any virtual pilot when flying solo SP is a no go.

По чувствительности есть же регламенты в которых отражены настройки по соотношению сигнал/шум для сигнала ! Согласно им настраивается порог на срабатывание соответствующей индикации для сигнализации по пеленгу не более 4 дБ и для шкалы мощности излучений не менее 2-3 Дб (не более 5 дБ для первой лампы и не более 7 дБ для второй и так далее согласно типа угрозы) !

The thread is about what we want to see in DC not what you're afraid of not getting. ED said they're not trying to copy BMS, they have their own vision, and that's good. Just wait and see, no matter how much time it takes. Don't let random DCS influencers influence your judgement.

So when you lock there is diamond showing deflection of radar antenna, the HUD scale for this element is +/-70 degrees horizontal tally and +/-45 degrees vertically. It works great horizontally, but vertically only reacts to the angle between your plane and the target in vertical space (not actual gimbal limit, your own nose angle has no effect). I am sure ED is aware of this?

Thankyou for the quick reply. Saves me planning for a Patreon cost as well then. I wasn’t complaining about it by the way, was just hoping for more info to see if the pro maps stated would be something worth getting. sorry had no idea that the pop out was a 3rd party product, as I’ve never seen it before. Intresting, Thankyou for the answer. Had no idea that this was from another 3rd party as I’ve never seen this interface before apart from within the Herc. Must admit it looks good, so I’m off to see if it’s worth adding to my other modules. As this has now been answered very clearly. Can a Moderator lock it down to any more comments. It’s good to keep the answer clear here in case anyone else spots it and becomes intrigued. But now they will get the answer with a quick search.

No, just better regain lock before missile passes the target! The N-019 will only illuminate for the missile 60 seconds anyways

HI, I find that the A20 does not defend itself nearly well enough, enemy fighters can fly through a large Box formation with virtually no risk at all.... Is there a way that we can adjust their level of aggression towards enemy fighters ? The B 17s are not much better either, when fighters attack a 12 ship box formation, the air should be buzzing with tracers Kind regards

Did you check for how long can the lock be broken?

А спину тебе вареньем не намазать? Есть требования обязательные к выполнению, один из документов я привёл, ВЕЗДЕ выпущенное положение шасси и механизации обозначается ЗЕЛЁНЫМ цветом, в гражданской авиации требования те же читай Авиационные правила, "нормы лётной годности"или опровергни мои слова и выложенные документы иной нормативной документацией определяющей именно жёлтый цвет, а не пустым балабольством...

Whatever else is going on, that I‘m actually sure of. If you want the proper and consistent recognition of axis across multiple modules (and games for that matter). You need to properly set up your FFB device on the device level (+the associated config software). If you have to invert the most basic axis (pitch/roll) in the sim, you‘re already off on the wrong foot. Since this only happened so far in the corsair (and intermittently), I assume it’s a bug.

The visor feels like I'm looking through dirty plastic. It's okay when looking outside but really hazy when looking down into the cockpit. While this is likely to be a true representation of the real life visor, I still would prefer a clear filter that darkens without the hazy blur. Is anyone up to doing a mod for this if its possible to edit?

Although the payloads are limited to be symmetrical, different smoke pod colors shouldn't block the weapon system. Could the smoke pods be reduced to one type in the future, and set with certain color for every pylon, like the fuse setting of bombs?

Well, there are two modules that would be next: the OH-58E and the Chinhook. And a few guides that need updating. I'll just wait and see what happens. I find it impressive how he keeps track of the sheer number of guides he's published.

You don't hold it. The radar sends a short radio signal with X power, then stops illumination and waits for the return, collects the signal, processes it and so on. Then sends the signal again. As you could see from the MiG-29 and spo-15 documents here, the latter is synchronized with such radar pulses. One pulse is the peak power, the very same pulse devided on its Length + all the time between the pulses is average (sustained, whatever) power It always had waaay-way more AWACS planes, so... So we probably can say that while the MiG should have cgi support, the Western aircraft should have AWACS one Benefit - probably. But don't expect it to be a MiG-29 competitor, it'll be just another mid 2000s bluefor amraam slinger

Yep, with no idea how barometric/radar/laser ranging is supposed to interact, let alone whether (ED known) bug fixes have been delivered yet its pretty tricky to proceed.