All Activity

And this is an example of how different we all are, VR is an opportunity for me to experience having a fully immersive cockpit without having the expensive of spending what would be thousands of pounds to pay for a home pit which I couldn’t afford plus I wouldn’t have the space for anyway, and I do find a level of immersion that I find authentic, however looking down at an empty seat is just for me a distraction and an immersion breaker and once I have it in my mind and particularly because there are so many options in DCS to fly aircraft that have them I’d rather choose another option, and I know there are plenty of others that feel the same way, having asked the question about the the pilot in the Mig 21 and getting a reply saying it was planned, all be it back in 2021, but then asking a question on the forums about the F4U and getting a reply that I can only take to mean they have no interest in doing one I’ve come to the decision that the F4U won’t be for me, I’m a Mig 21 customer and I hope one day Magnitude will stay true to their statement that it will be worked on, but after the situation with other 3rd party modules I’m far more careful with what I buy now on DCS. But anyway I don’t hold any malice I genuinely hope that people enjoy the Corsair and they can get success with it.

null The 416th squadron of Virtual Airforce is currently open for new pilots (and RIO's). We fly both the F/A-18C Hornet as the F-14B Tomcat. Although we're a mil-sim (light) squadron and we take naval aviation simulation very seriously we also like to have fun while doing it. If you're an experienced pilot (or RIO) and you are willing to commit to our squadron we're very happy to take you for an introductionary flight to show your skills. What can you expect from us: a dedicated group that takes naval simulation in DCS-world seriously. Every Tuesday and Thursday at 19.30Z we have practice sessions and regularly we also have missions or we make (virtual) excursions to other groups. If you are not afraid to commit to learning naval aviation in depth then we hope to see you soon. For more information come and join our Discord: https://discord.gg/B5Vkrg3Ttr See you soon.

Hello T.A. I absolutely love flying the F-16 in DCS. Though I am not Iranian I would still like to fly with some people, especially fans of the F-16. One thing though, I only have the free Caucasus and Marianas maps, so in case you were thinking of using another map for a multiplayer server I sadly cannot.

Unfortunately not. But I guess it's due to the latest DCS core update from yesterday. Avionics reinstallation seems to be required after each core update.

So it looks like my prediction was spot on. Since people have been using a 4070 with decent results in DCS VR, this card should perform well enough if you manage your expectations.

ты знаешь обычно в интернетах советуюи чего - в PBO поднять +200 Mhz на турбобуст, и -20 cделать в CO там же. я воспользовался советом и с ноября до недавнего времени так и пролетал. ничего необычного, но камень был горячеват немного. но недавно посоветовали поставить -30 в CO, а буст ядра не трогать вовсе (не бустить камень, а просто андервольт), сделал - и да, камень стал холоднее, без ущерба, впрочем, производительности в VR. (но в плоских играх я особо ничего не заметил тоже, там все и было хорошо и стало хорошо). и теперь у меня цифры в простое примерно такие: Вообщем тебе решать. По поводу HAGS - это ты зря, конечно, но суеверия есть суеверия. отключение HAGS может только на калькуляторах какой то буст серьезный принести, но это тут недавно уже обсуждали (с цифрами). Что в W11 нужно сделать на мой взгляд - в изоляции ядра все опции поотключать. может вопрос настройки? я в MSFS2024 летаю, нормально, с 1.20 RQ. ровно моя ситуация) после PCL одевать (или надевать) Q3 очень не хотелось, но, соглашусь, у PCL куча своих минусов)

DCS 2.9.16.10973 DCS — Базовая игра Высокая загрузка CPU (в т.ч. в главном меню) — исправлено.

Ich hatte das mit Windows 11 kürzlich probiert und mir das System dabei so nachhaltig zerstört, dass ich Windows 11 plattbügeln und neu installieren musste. Beim nächsten Mal würde ich direkt die Neuinstallation einpreisen. Allerdings tendiere ich zu semi-paranoiden Einstellungen, die Windows so wenig Befugnisse wie möglich geben. Könnte durchaus sein, dass das Autoupdate eigentlich die richtigen Treiber installiert hätte und das nur auf meinem System nicht durfte oder so.

The 2nd graph seems nice to me since 13900k P-cores is from 0-15 (with hyper-threading). How is the performance for this configuration then?

это 1-й ревёрб.Хороший шапк,но уже история+шнуры часто вылетают в пико не обязательно очки сувать в маску,можно без маски линзы -да есть накладные магнитные,чтоб без очков квест3 или пико4ультра

We have a Winwing subforum. @NineLine Please move this thread.

I fortunately have enough space on my drive that I kept 2.9.14 and just renamed the folder when I updated to the newer versions. So, it's a pretty simple matter to rename folders and swap back and forth. Going back to 2.9.14 and performance is very good. Both in normal and in VR with no other system changes. Unfortunately, I lose access to the Germany map as that was introduced in 2.9.15. There are still many other maps to fly on though until this gets resolved. I can only guess at how complex the code base for this game is. And the strides that were made in multi-thread support are amazing. To the point, I understand, we not only don't need Process Lasso any longer, but should not use it if you're on Windows 11. I'm sure they'll get this sorted out. I just hope it's soon

OK Danke

You can already see this on the F10 map like is shown in your example. Nearly every server I see has your aircraft symbol enabled, likely for this reason.

At this point I'm fairly happy with VD (I just need to create a small passthrough window to see my keyboard) and probably will just keep Meta Link as a backup option, once it is fixed.

Bullets in DCS already have decent collision physics, with the ground and other physical objects. Bullets colliding with each other though, I don't really think it would be necessary. And yeah, there only would be a rare probability of such collisions happening, that's why that feature is not in the game. Also it would cause a larger form of lag, especially on low-end devices.

@bhoop19 has already started work on a standalone version that does not use the F-15C avionics. It will be a long process and not something anyone should expect anytime soon. It takes a lot of work and he, like most of us, is doing this during his free time after working a full-time job and spending time with loved ones. So, yes, something is in the works for a future date, but not anytime soon. In the meantime, be happy that we've got what we've got. It's the best it's ever been in my opinion. Assuming that you can get it working correctly in a regular mission in mission editor, as I stated above, I don't know if the quick start missions work or not. It was said that the cold start quick mission worked. It's not like this jet is hard to start up. Battery - ON, Generators Left/Right - ON, APU start. Once it's up and running, that's it. Taxi, take off. Those quick start missions were written for a version that was introduced in 2020 unless I'm mistaken.

üüHi everyone, There's a couple of threads on the incorrect hardened shelters at Luftwaffe airbases, so here's one concentrating on the shelters at USAFE and RAFG airbases. This principally concerns Ramstein AB, Spangdahlem AB and Hahn AB, as well as RAF Gütersloh. These airbases currently have a modified generation one shelter, with an external siding door. An example can be found in this first post of this thread, but you can see that this same type of shelter is also present at the following airbases: Ramstein AB: However, this kind of shelter is only present at Bitburg AB IRL. The smaller kind of shelter that's actually present at these airbases is the original TAB-VEE shelter, which is broadly similar to the mod. generation one shelter (they do have the same external dimensions and configuration) but has clamshell doors internal to the shelter. Here's one such example (at Spangdahlem): Here's an example at Ramstein: Here's a drawing of one with an F-15 for scale, measurements are metric: Apart from Gütersloh, the other type of shelter found at all these airbases is the generation 3 shelter, suitable for aircraft like A-10. While Ugra have done a decent attempt at recreating it, it's the wrong shape. The real thing is elliptical, Ugra's version is semi-circular, making quite a bit taller than the real thing. Compared to: This example is at RAF Upper Heyford, so it may be a gen. 2 shelter which is a little larger than the 3, but the overall shape and configuration is pretty similar with gen. 3. Here are some drawings of a gen. 3 shelter, sourced from this website: The airbase where the current mod. gen. 1 shelter is the most incorrect is RAF Gütersloh, which IRL has a shelter that looks like this: Though note, only RAF Bruggen and Laarbuch has the extra enclosed space, seen on the left of this image: Gütersloh and Wildenrath instead, look like this (Gütersloh): Wildenrath: The OP of this thread has already done a pretty good job of modelling this type of shelter.

Thanks Guys

hello. sounds like a need to run a repair. if you have mods, disable them beforehand. sharing your DCS.LOG may help too.

yeah. lots of folks did DNS changes to get past EDs problems. most have undoubtedly forgotten they made these changes. good to hear you are back up and running. "when in doubt, it is probably DNS"

DCS 2.9.16.10973.1 Ja kann sein, bzw. gestern.

Out of curiosity, what would be to penalty to the player for constantly mishandling the aircraft he flies? Or are you just proposing this for virtual squadron use, where the individual would be penalized by his squadron members? I know it’s done in civilian sims where the emphasis is only on the flying itself. DCS, however, tends to place the focus on how well you blow things up. While I, personally, like to fly well, I’m still not sure this is something I would use.

ED will eventually get rid of the MT folder. not sure when and why it would matter if they "both the same". there are still users with the shortcut pointing to MT. i think some of the information displayed in the analyzer is playing the odds. it tells me the same nonsense when i run my log just to see what it comes up with. it states the same info each time. good to hear your are back up and running.

Kann es ein das heute das Update 2.9.16.10973 zum dowloden gekommen ist , bei DCS finde ich unter Änderungsprotokoll nichts ?????