All Activity

Agreed.

Hi, please include a short as possible track replay example thank you

I just finished reading 'Sweating the Metal' by FLT LT Alex Duncan and I am in the process of reading 'Immediate Response' by Major Mark Hammond. Both of these men flew RAF Chinooks in Afghanistan. Both of them talk about somebody, co-pilot I think, calling out the aircraft's speed and altitude while on approach. If something like this could be developed for the DCS Chinook I believe it would be helpful and also add to the in game immersion. Thanks, Jim

null

I just googled it and it says the C can still engage if the radar is shut off, and isn't as accurate, The D model is more accurate though, through the GPS/INS and so on.

The newest DCS version 2.9.18.12722 introduces breaking changes to net.dostring_in(). These changes, which I consider fundamentally flawed, break many third party missions and scripts that heavily rely on net.dostring_in(), including my web console. While I hope that these careless changes will be reverted ASAP, here's an exemplary autoexec.cfg that re-enables net.dostring_in() for trusted Lua states: -- allow use of net.dostring_in() from privileged Lua states -- https://forum.dcs.world/topic/376636-changes-to-the-behaviour-of-netdostring_in/ -- Lua states from which net.dostring_in() can be called -- WARNING: DO **NOT** ADD "scripting" AS THAT WOULD MAKE DCS VULNERABLE TO ARBITRARY -- CODE EXECUTION FROM MALICIOUS MISSION FILES! net.allow_unsafe_api = { "gui", "server", "userhooks" } -- Lua states that can be accessed via net.dostring_in("state", ...) net.allow_dostring_in = { "config", "export", "gui", "mission", "scripting", "server", "userhooks" } On a side note, the a_do_script() return value pass-thru has returned with 2.9.18.12722. It was initially added with 2.9.13.6818 and silently removed in 2.9.15.9408 to fix a segmentation fault. Following in its first incarnation's footsteps, the reincarnation of a_do_script() return value pass-thru is also broken, so we'll have to stick with the temporary file workaround for now.

I keep reading and hearing about this word "Promise" can someone please point me to the official statements from either side that contain the word "Promise" please. I promise my girlfriend I wont spend money on DCS modules again, but do it anyway... promises can be empty, nothing legal about them. face value etc.

The mod is broken after the July 22nd update. The Discord channel says to wait for a new version or a fix.

Thank you very much for all the hard work. Since I found DML I have been making all the missions for my squad and the saved time and effort with your tools has been amazing. Good luck and I hope that we see you again here. Bob Makowsky

Hi, My osb displays button text are missing which I use the AAQ-33. nullWhat can I do?

you need to make a SPI before release with tms fwd long : switch target, tms, release, switch etc.

We're blessed to have so many legal experts who enjoy flying in DCS...where would be with them, and the self entitled consumers too... ? And in the mean time, Razbam modules are still very much enjoyable.

Nope. No GM1 tank fitted. Double nope. See above.

Since that is the reference material for the approval of GM-1 at 80gr/sec in the BMW801D2 engine it says EXACTLY what I have told you. And for the third time: LOL. Okay let's walk you through it using the specific instructions from Focke Wulf and BMW. 1. What is the only engine the FW-190A8/R11 came from the factory with? A. Chevy 350 V8 B. Lycoming O-360A1A C. BMW801Q (BMW801TU) *hint - its the same motor found on the NORMAL FIGHTER Variant that crashed in England in August 1944. You know the airplane that wasn't an R11... The FW-190A8/R11 operated by II/JG301 for example: https://www.ww2.dk/oob/bestand/jagd/biijg301.html 2. True or False "The BMW801Q engine came equipped from the factory to use GM-1" A. True B. False It's an open book test so I will give you a hint: *GM-1 is mentioned right here in the Engine Installation manual...the document the guy picking up a wrench uses... How do we know this was ground reality? Well, we have an airplane with this exact engine equipped from the factory to use GM-1: The British conclude it was equipped to use it.

We have fixed this issue as described below. Take into account that this will only be available in a forthcoming DCS update: Cockpit livery selection was added to the module options. It returns the ability to use custom cockpit liveries. In particular the "Mirage F1 English Cockpit CE and EE version" user mod. Note that the mod contents should be modified by renaming 'default' folders to 'english'.

I'm struggling with JDAM delivery using MT mode with the new pod. I have multiple targets selected in point track, so all have the square around them, with one with the circle, that stage has worked well... Once within range, I release a JDAM, then TMS right to cycle through the target list, and see the circled target does indeed move, together with the crosshairs. However all the JDAMs. hit the same target. Not sure what I'm doing wrong or if this is a bug. Can record a video of this in a bit.

Well, I've also had some slight lags during flight without using the UI or doing anything which seem to also be dependant on multicrew. But apart from that, it's just the HB UI

Court System, Is not limited to actual use of the Court Rooms, Trials, etc. But if we want to get technical, Mediation is prolly the accurate term for the current phase. Something like:

So this was posted on Friday, July 25 and the sale lasts only until Monday July 28. Seems a bit weird to call it a "midweek" sale!

Thats why we are here waiting for the outcome.

I’ll take your word for it, I don’t AAR in aircraft that use this. What part of that is broken exactly? I still see the lights there in your screenshot.

Is only the HB UI lagging but the rest of DCS works as usual and without lag? You might be running into this rare issue that we had before launch, causing the delay of the release. Which was then fixed for all testers. Mh, odd stuff.

Seems like Chuck's Guide IS the official manual.

Perhaps they should stop advertising that it has English documentation then. Thank goodness for the Chuck's Guide on this module.

It's broken man.