Leaderboard

Там все миссии конченые,в такие кампании нуб бемби играет,он любит в сякое говнецо поиграть,а люди отдают деньги за такое дерьмо и не зная при этом что это дерьмо,вот в чём обидно.

As it says, I made the Tu-22M3 flyable. I hated the lack of wing sweep, so I wrote a avLuaDevice script (sweep.lua) to follow a schedule something like it would be in real life. They only have 3 settings, 20, 30 (I think) and 65 degrees. It's the Su-25T cockpit, so it's functional and that's it. It will release the bombs on the racks ok, but if you manage to get all the bombs in the bomb bay to let go as a salvo, you go boom! You will need to add the Su-25T's shape and texture files and rename accordingly. If they ever get the air to ground radar working in DCS, I'm going to town on this thing. Spaciba, Brian Tu22mod.zip

Hello guys Here few screenshots from my last project, the Baltic Bees... Once again I hope that you enjoy but it's just the beginning. I return here with other screenshots and news, bye. Skull

It was a total mistake by the Russians. They thought the ship was the USS Donald Trump. :lol:

Lua table entries do not have any defined order. The mist.utils.serialize function uses pairs() to iterate over the table entries, which returns the items in whatever order they happen to be in memory (which might depend on the order they were inserted and/or on some internal hash function). You could make a copy of the mist.utils.serialize function and replace the call to pairs() with ipairs(). That would output numeric keys in order, but skip non-numeric keys. To make it work with arbitrary tables, which may include non-numeric keys, you would have to first build a list of all keys and sort it. This wiki page has more information on ways to serialize tables in Lua, but at a quick glance I could not see a solution that (a) sorted keys, (b) produced machine-readable data (i.e. valid Lua) and © was written in pure Lua code.

Like Quake III :D That would be nice!

^^What Zilla said, it is beyond strict. I'd say you'd be fine. My specs are below and OR's system thing flagged my CPU. I'd suggest DL the SteamVR test and let the render play. That test showed this:

Their Compatibility Tool is Super Strict, Like Extremely Strict. I ran Rift, the demos, and DCS on my Server box the last week, The Server Box is a PhenomII 2 Core CPU at 2.4GHz, an Underclocked AMD 7950 GPU,. and 16GB of Ram, Server box's function is a small media server for my network (TV and Movies) It's Choppy, but it works for the demos and smaller games, DCS I had to drop everything to lowest to get 30 fps, but I dont have Hotas on the server box, so It's pointless, I just wanted to checkout the demo's and stuff while I waited for adapters to ship for my gaming rig. On that note, the MAJOR Issue that alot of people are runnning into is USB3 controllers, ASMedia and Eltron are extremely problematic, Eltron USB3 drivers will blue screen your system either immediately after you plug in the HMD, or it will lock up the driver and you're system's USB3 ports will no longer detect devices as they are attached or removed, and eventually blue screen when the driver times out. If you want to see how DCS Will do in VR (as a general rule of thumb, as some stuff can't be simulated w/o the actual runtime and HMD). Run DCS in Stereo Mode.

Don't be surprised if your comment is moderated. This thread is to discuss the Rift in DCS. It is not a support forum for the Rift recommended system requirements... Nor should people be discussing eBay prices with that policy in mind. I guess some slip through the net. I think you'd get away with it. Unless you need multi core performance though I'd switch to a 6700k (or equivalent at time of upgrade) to save a lot of money and have the current gen architecture. As you're probably aware... most gaming applications are still heavily influenced by a single thread so the 6 cores won't be doing you any favours for Rift (yet) which is perhaps why it's flagged.

2 x Attack choppers flying Escort duty to LZ near the TA, Pilots are Fishbed, Hatchetman and Red Star who was driver in Mi-8MTV-2

From RU-section

According to the manual he's quoting, those buttons will sometimes illuminate after engine start even though there isn't a problem. Don't know what the situation was in the picture you saw. Here's a (mine) translation of the top half of Esac_mirmidon's image from the manual including the section he has "boxed": These aren't backup channels. They are the various system subchannels each controlling their piece of the FCS. I think that's what he was trying to get across in describing each light as referencing a particular system-axis.

I think that's because it didn'T feel like a big step for many users, especially those that were flying the A-10C before. The first version of DCSW felt almost the same as the last BS1 and last A-10C versions. You guessed 2009 because that was when Black Shark was released.

40км для вертолета в самый раз. [ame] [/ame] А для этого убожества и 10-ти км хватит: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Lw6NR6PhE18/maxresdefault.jpg

лол это ты и видео твои лолвские,последний аргумент,осетия тоже республика и почему то кампанию играть хочится,а если ты в такое говно играеш,то играй молча .

Такой вопрос: накопление усталости конструкции, моделирование упругих деформаций, разрушение отдельных элементов - это результаты какой-то планомерной работы (движение в сторону ADM, продвинутой модели повреждений) или что-то другое (решили попробовать на Су-27, звёзды совпали и т.д.)? Ещё такой вопрос: у прототипа крылья действительно отламываются и улетают (отрываются болты?)? Не может получиться так что одна панель обшивки (читай пояс лонжерона) потеряет устойчивость а вторая изогнётся (другой вариант - одна панель порвалась, вторая изогнулась), т.е. консоль погнулась и осталась в таком положении? Благодарю! П.С. Про "Стандартный коэффициент запаса" согласен, как нам рассказывали (на кафедре самолётостроения), обычно берётся от 1.5 до 1.7, учитывает дефекты производства, ошибки эксплуатации и прочую криворукость (а не для того чтобы ЛА сделать "покрепче"), но именно стандартного значения не имеет. Отсюда кстати можно сделать вывод про то, что выжимание максимума сверх установленных ограничений - это ошибка эксплуатации, карается соответственно. Но для нагибания в онлайне "все средства хороши" ))

[ame] [/ame] Take a look at this!

Tested this morning and, it seems, that repairs are made to the airframe. I stressed the airframe to 13 Gs and landed. Requested repairs and, 32 minutes later, was told that repairs were complete. Took off and flew repeated 8 & 9 G maneuvers without incident. Prior to requesting repairs, attempting those maneuvers resulted in wing damage.

1.Это не байка. Жаль не известно каков был вес Сушки и скорость на момент фиксации 11g. В ГА если в полете было превышение эксплуатационных ограничений, то ЛА должен быть осмотрен на предмет повреждений и возможности дальнейшей эксплуатации. Составляется акт и тд. ИМХО в военной авиации должна быть похожая система. Короче участники должны помнить этот случай и должны остаться материалы от "разбиралова". Мне тоже приходилось слышать и читать про этот случай. 2.Согласно каким докам здесь приводятся эксплуатационные ограничения по перегрузке по прочности конструкции. Если это РЛЭ СУ-27СК, которое есть в сети, то это не вполне надежный документ. 3.Эксплуатационное ограничение по прочности не означает, что при его превышении конструкция разрушится. При прочностных расчетах всегда закладывается запас прочности, который берется из отраслевых стандартов.

Ну не знаю, IMHO если делать "отвал крыльев" - то у обоих, если отказ систем - то у обоих, в пр. случае даже адекватные пользователи не поймут - слишком бездоказательно разрушение одного и крепость другого. Т.е. есть документы - по ним и делать однотипно - в смысле не против того, как на Су-27 реализовано, но метод реализации должен быть один на обоих самолётах..

yep, launch Steam in the Vive headset (click on the system button on the controller once) and look for the settings (up right corner) then VR Settings, General VR Settings. There should be a line which if you click on it will reset the seated position. (Click here to reset seated position). Other way to do it, press 5 key in the numpad :D Cheers, e.

Milhouse: "I knew the dog before he came to class!"

Yes* It depends on the capabilities of each individual sam site. The Buk is rather unique in that the launcher has a tracking radar built in along with an optical tracking system. As a generalization complex sams require a search radar (SR), tracking radar(TR), launcher (LN) and if available command centers(CC) to fully function. Not all complex sams have a CC object, so the requirement is down to whether that object exists for that type of sam site. At somepoint with 1.5 the HAWK received new 3d models and 2 new objects, one of which was a CC and as a side effect it broke old missions because the HAWK now required a CC to fire. The workflow is basically SR>CC>TR>LN. Which brings us back to the Buk. Because the launcher has a tracking radar built in and an optical sight it can independently acquire targets without the aide of the search radar and the CC to communicate said targets to the launcher. Keep in mind it has to visually acquire the target to engage it, which will typically be closer than its minimum firing range. It is also worth noting that if a tracking radar is tracking a target when the search radar gets destroyed, it will likely keep tracking the target and it is possible that it will engage.

Looks great, Dusty, thanks for your work! I'll definitely put this one 8n my queue, fantastic attention to detail!

Die Ingenieure, die den MSFFB Pro und MSFFB 2 designt haben, waren entweder Perfektionisten oder irgendwer hatte Angst in den USA wegen "Mein Joystick hat meine Kaffetasse umgehauen und mir heissen Kaffe auf den Schoss gekippt!" verklagt zu werden. Jedenfalls hat der MSFFB eine Lichtschranke. Solange die nicht unterbrochen wird (du also den Stick nicht greifst), bleiben die FFB-Effekte (und damit auch die Standard-Federung) aus. Wenn du den Stick loslässt, ist die Feder weg, der Stick kippt weg, und dann auch der Heli. Ein kleines Stück Klebeband über dem kleinen Loch am Griff (ungefähr da, wo dein kleiner Finger zu liegen kommt), schafft Abhilfe. Ich kann mit meinem unmodifizierten TM Warthog den Huey relativ gut fliegen, aber nicht lange, weil irgendwann der Arm vom ständigen gegen die starke Feder arbeiten lahm wird. Hab mir deshalb einen MSFFB2 besorgt, bin damit aber noch nicht so recht warm geworden. Der kleine Arcade-Griff ist ungewohnt, wenn man vom Warthog kommt. Der Stick selbst ist zwar sehr präzise, aber durch den etwas kürzeren Stick (verglichen mit dem Warthog) reagiert er auch empfindlicher. Zumindest bei meinem Modell hab ich das Gefühl, dass die FFB-Federung nicht sehr gleichmäßig ist, ich den Stick mit FFB also nicht so genau steuern kann (aber ganz ohne FFB ist auch blöd, weil dann jegliches Feedback über die Position fehlt). Außerdem ist die große Basis des Sticks im Weg, wenn ich den auf meine bestehende Center Mount-Konstruktion setze. Entweder ich hab ein Exemplar erwischt, was schon etwas verschlissen ist, oder ich muss mich einfach nur dran gewöhnen (hab erst ein paar Stunden mit dem MSFFB2, 50 bis 100 mit dem Warthog). Vielleicht hilft es auch, den MSFFB zu verlängern.

Well, that mission is not exactly the best example of one when you should be doing a full alignment ;)

Что бы закончить все домыслы на этот счёт: Система наводит штангу на корзину которая выбрана.Директорное кольцо должно быть в центре.Это в реале.Привет Знайкам от Air_man(а) и от Североморцев.:music_whistling:

Landing at Mozdok after a hard-fought battle. Unfortunately, I failed the mission because my wingman died. :cry:

I have had problems with ASO pod not working if loaded up with 42 flares and 22 chaff (even though that should be the default ratio). Try it without changing the flare and chaff amount to see if it works.

Also you have to hold the button down for a while before it will start to drop countermeasures.

It's working okay for me. Equip an ASO-2 pod in your loadout, press right-shift + J to open the cover as Britchot says, then hold left-ctrl+ space to launch two flares and one chaff.

I'm quite removed from my computer and haven't had a chance to fly the current release but do you have the SPRD cover open?