Viral-51st-Vfw

Sorry lost the link for some reason post edit 51st vfw

This help? 51st vfw

94 or later for gps* ifa /topic/333264-overview-of-the-ins/?do=findComment&comment=5287977 I don't have enough pre GPS flight time to comment constructively around what you can do (irl and current dcs) to resolve 51st vfw

/index.php?/topic/336775-Radar-priority-Bug#entry5319574 51st vfw

Looks like "WIP" from new pilot model /index.php?/topic/336754-New-pilot-3D-model-removed-kneeboard-feature#entry5318668 51st vfw

https://forum.dcs.world/uploads/monthly_2020_12/a7164ad7fc9afdb00d45c6d38655d50d.thumb.png.ae95641f51c96d36de8c29270d03d813.png Is it not doing that in vr? 51st vfw

Throwing this out there Water depth path finding an issue? If you move the spinners to "deeper" water do they do the same? Not at my PC to look up that areas depth 51st vfw

Trk file, iirc, is perfect for debugging this scenario if it is a binding issue. Op please attach when able. 51st vfw

If you disconnect your joystick and press the keyboard key (sorry I'm not at my PC to dbl check the bind) does it enable? Other than that attach trk is probably the best to debug. Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

I'd recommend watching jabbers case 1 (or similar) at around the 10 min mark. In particular your initial break turn pull to 1% speed to g, do what ever angle of bank(aob) required but keep the meatball/fpm on the line. That should get you close to be able to dirty up, and progress to on speed aoa as you roll out. Pay particular attention when he mentions your horizontal distance from the tacan heading line (the runway heading for field)...I believe this can be referred to as cross track error. Someone please confirm that detail. Then once you're on speed and at the approx cte distance, you final turn off downwind should get you close with 27 degree aob. The only difference on the final turn for carrier (at the round down abeam) is for field I try to turn when the threshold is between 7 and 8 o'clock vs carrier 8 to 9 (or as jobbers mentions 9 o'clock minus 5 degrees). This is from the field should be stationary. Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Once you get to where you want to hold focus, Lctrl f11 iirc Some other helpful nuggets here as well. Edit sorry YouTube link didn't come over Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

You'd need a second account, with super carrier iirc. But no, not from the same running instance. Alternatively, you could look at one of the third party offerings that push data say to discord. Eg https://github.com/DCS-gRPC/lso Though it's not a video Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Dl on,then dl on a second time Sniped by rob

Been awhile for me but something like TDC to get near Tuc, recce mark to zoom and then step. Someone please correct me Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Short answer "as designed" /topic/325911-shouldnt-the-nsw-button-undesignate-targets-when-pressed/?do=findComment&comment=5218306&share_tid=325911&share_pid=5218306&share_fid=74365&share_type=t&link_source=app Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

I sorta kinda recall something about it mentioned "down the road" post ready room. But i'd assume brainstorming and not concrete plan. Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Don't forget about raid for the closely spaced bandits component Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Decrease range below 40nm make a difference?

Disregard, working as of 2.7.3.8494

Unscientificaly we have seen some cases where the client side lso gives a different grade then the server paddles. It seems to be connected to latency, but again not much time looked yet. There are much higher priorities at the moment imho, but would be great if the client could submit their grade to the server, if even to just push to the log. Moose feature set out of scope.

I'm not able to access the log at the moment but can/will update; Had anyone else noticed the landing quality mark event regressed back to comment lso grade.

Water depth a factor?