F-2

Yes, the 2011 prototype was a conversion of bort 154 one of the original six 9.15 aircraft

The weight of the MMRCA should be somewhat similar to the original 9.15? I had a table on the hot weather turn test on MMRCA and it shows the relative turns. It would give an idea of performance.

some footage of the F1 and Super Hornet going at it http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Rafale%2BVs%2BSuperHornet/video/x6bnpq_rafale-vs-superhornet_sport

My paper is from Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences

Development of a Air-to-Air Missile Simulation Program for the Lethality Evaluation.pdf I sent this a month or so ago. It’s a Korean paper with information on the AIM-120B with info from the weapons employment manual used with permission. It should be possible to do it very well.

R-77 testing around 18:30

thesis on the development of APG-71, some interesting stuff. The citations though at the end are interesting. Maybe some of those are worth requesting? https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/cf4f2367-a4d9-45cb-828d-ce70f4b3ab7b/content

GFM and AI improvements are probably the most important single player issue to come so of course support.

Supposedly the article has some good info though. I’d love to get it.

Hero

DTIC has these papers on the Rafale. Most are translations of French articles, a few I have. Some might have some used information though. FOIA 2024-89_UL Rafale aircraft.csv

Magazine article I want, but I love the picture.

That’s pretty much exactly as I heard. I really hope they do a super detailed model as the amount of documentation is pretty crazy.

Besides those Magic ii is the only other missile I’ve seen on a fulcrum.

https://theaviationgeekclub.com/f-16-vs-mig-29-when-the-mighty-viper-dogfighted-with-the-fulcrum-for-the-first-time/ Patriot from F-16.net (F-16 is MLU) Personal correspondence with Clifton On the F-16a

MICA delta V

I agree they should be kept, they have value for performance

On the Moldovan 9.13

As I understand it SP mode is also removed from later build Soviet Fulcrums as well and was not generally used in practice Your right about processor, though I understand it both were considered insufficient until N019m. The manual ED use I believe is for export aircraft. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2378427/ in theory that is enough for an ultra real radar model and it describes N019B in great detail. They could probably estimate the difference in performance due to processor speed. I don’t think in terms of operations per second N019 and N019EB are that different, like 170,000-200,000 compared to 400,000 in N019M on the Mig-29S. The only available manual newer then the above is ironically the zhuk-me so it can’t be directly compared.

I was under the impression air to ground and long range search came with VEP? I though VE had the improved signal processor and native R-77 support.

https://defence-blog.com/russian-fighter-fired-and-lost-a-secret-missile-in-ukraine/?amp recovered R-77-1

The National Air an Space Museum has some documentation on the Mig-29SE, possibly marketing information or something from an export customer, Like Peru or Malaysia. anyone in the DC, mother Virginia area able to take a look? the documents are AM-501072-01: MiG MiG-29SE Fulcrum-C [Documents.]

Good news folks The very first Super Hornet prototype will be joining the museum of transportation! We soon will have a Super Hornet to scan. https://tnmot.org/collection/f-a-18-e1-super-hornet-u-s-navy/

I collected a ton of info here

I understand the base fulcrum needs to be in a slight climb and it’s cobra is a bit rougher. The mig-29k can do a cobra at 2:22