F-2

The KA-50 is a very low production run aircraft and almost all the individual aircraft are quite unique.

https://mil.sina.cn/sd/2018-08-17/detail-ihhvciiw3477372.d.html?from=wap The metal mock up with a J-10s model behind it. Does it still exist? Where is it?

Oh I found it 10NatAetoConfJF17.pdf

Do you have a copy of the wing LERX CFD study? Or know the title? I was curious if the authors did anything similar g FB or other aircraft.

Their are a number of prototypes or very low production run aircraft in game, that line in the sand is long passed.

A prop su-25? Yesh

Oh cool! Sorry they stole your stuff though, that sucks. anyway two things I’m excited about ive really wanted PL-11 and PL-8 for a long time apg-66 is extremely well documented, I posted a ton on the first page and I’m sure Deka has a lot. We have the potential for an extremely realistic radar simulation.

Hey Uboats, are other AI aircraft previously announced for the asset pack still on the table? With the J-8F, J-10a, and J-15 it’s quite robust.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6d9f/4a70bf1f214f014680efb1a2b5b018675107.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/figure/presents-the-Cl-results-on-Chengdu-J-10-Sukhoi-SU-30-and-Eurofighter-Typhoon-EF-T_fig2_350715567 I have these and the thrust curves of the AL-31F. You guys think it would be worth it to make a basic EFM?

Hey what radar was the 1991 version gunna use and what version did the A use. I had a buisness idea today.

Would it be possible to add AIM-7 to the AI F-16 MLU. Taiwan’s MLU aircraft carried AIM-7 and that has new relevance as of today.

That reminds me, I wonder how far along it is

plenty of Chinese aircraft of this time frame use export components. The later J-7 uses an imported HUD. Different J-8 use a mix and match of various avonics, most of them use Italian and Israeli missiles. Their is little benefit debating purity.

Isn’t J-8II the name of all J-8 with the side intakes? So PP and F are both J-8II? But it can be reduced to existing or not. J-8PP module is compatible with reality and other J-8 are not. I’m simply pointing out no one will be missing some of the more notable features of the J-8 nor does it do anything that the others don’t.

Give it time, they have some documentation, they’re interested in perusing the project if they get more, it exists in a partially complete state. It has a realistic chance of being a future module.

sure it does it’s part of the game and we are talking about the game, the Ka-50 is similar. It’s been years since these things have been in the game. It’s either non mainstream but still fairly representative or nothing. I really don’t think anyone has any basis to complain nothing new is going on here. A peace pearl J-8 still fires the same missiles as a J-8F, has similar flight characteristics, and is in the Salish class radar range wise.

F-15 was qualified to carry the AIM-7P but I didn’t think the Air Force ever bought it.

Didn’t they only build three Su-25T that we have? Seems fine, the airframe was mass produced and the later versions had similar radar capabilities.

Paralay has a partially complete CAD model of the production Mig 1.42. He said he would let me know if he gets the rest. I would like to make an AI asset and make a campaign for the Eurofighter when it releases.

I think they or someone visited the surviving peace pearl aircraft a few years back. I would take it this that getting info on retired Chinese avonics is difficult and they went with PP because of that.

Both it’s kinda a mix

I think it should be taken domestic Chinese avonics are unlikely. very exciting! Pl-11 is what I need. Deka would you like some public documentation on APG-66 that I have? https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA142075.pdf https://www.scribd.com/document/429057021/F-16-Pulse-Doppler-Radar-AN-APG-66-Performance-1983 this is perfect for my 90s early 2000s East Asian scenarios! APG-66.pdf Apg-66 2.pdf

AD0526139 Evaluation of ECM Pod Performance with Various Formations (Phase 1) 5/1/1973 TACTICAL FIGHTER WEAPONS CENTER NELLIS AFB NV 109 pages ADB186362 U.S. Japan FS-X (FSX) Program Technology Bibliography: IEWS (Integrated Electronic Warfare System) 126 pages ADB199302 U.S. Japan FS-X (FSX) Program Technical Abstracts, Volume 2, Subject: 17. Integrated Electronic Warfare System (IEWS). AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS CENTER WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH FS-X PROGRAM (JAPAN) 5/1/1995 6 pages requesting these documents might provide some useful info for modeling

Something like that. Most Rafale kills on Typhoons seem to have been at low altitude, the Typhoon seems very competent down low but not that different then other fourth gen, once they get higher the Typhoon is a beast and even the F-15C is out matched.

That’s a good point, I’d be a shame if my pilot wasn’t super fit like me.:p