Gierasimov

As much as I understand the meaning of your post, I regarded BS3 upgrade as feature complete when I bought, that is what was advertised was delivered and now just normal DCS servicing will be performed.

Nice one. I went for three screens + MFDs but frankly the middle screen sits too tight behind my stick and is cumbersome to use effectively.

Same here

Hopefully with the new Su-17 model? Even better with Su-22M4 module? (Kind of second question of this nature to you this week from me, I know, I could not help it).

Hi Is this "correct as is"? Same engagement, 1st attempt - when AMRAAM is fired in VISUAL mode, I can get a kill from ~25nmi. The max that worked for me when tried repeatedly was 30nmi in this particular setup (.miz) - 120-Visual.trk 2nd attempt - If I lock up the target, the Maximum Launch Range (RMAX) is computed to about 13nmi. - 120-Locked.trk Also in the 120-Locked.trk there seems to be few seconds delay between target locked and HUD display symbology, in particular target box, range and AIM-120 Time to Active (ACT). I know that Steering Dot issue is already reported (lack of SHOOT cue) but I am specifically asking about the engagement ranges between two modes of firing. OR perhaps, this is all connected to current issues with Hornet A2A mode altogether and this post is not needed at all? Thanks. 120C-Locked.trk 120C-Visual.trk

Вы все еще планируете полную верность 9.12?

It never is. I guess the big water sits between us though

Hi. Another user was faster with his wish. Viggen is also a third party module.

You can buy a module and select gift option providing the recipient ED login. These is no permission to transfer module as per EULA.

@marcin34-13 congrats mate! Module coming your way later today.

Hey folks. New to DCS and enjoying it? Want to move to full fidelity module but struggling to get a jet or helo? Perhaps want to expand your horizons? Module is on me Why? Coz I want to. 1. Module / terrain by ED and from ED shop sale. 2. First come first served. Let me know.

ABSOLUTELY 100 % FOR SURE!!! AND we LOVE you!!

@oibafx Do you have the kmz for your original post about it? I don't even know how to get the map you posted. Thank you OnReTech!

How come other 3rd party managed? Syria map is full of SAM revetments.

Tested in one of my missions, no problems at all with AI wingman following the plan and executing mission objectives.

What's this ME. Mission Editor? How can you see actions PLAYED in ME? What are you talking about? To the OP, did you build the mission correctly? You have to fly your plan with AI following, if you don't even go to WP1 yourself, AI will do just that when you order him to execute mission. Hard to say without a miz file or a track.

Thank you, all understood now. Can't wait to fight on this map

So.. Cairo West Air Base will look the same as Abu Suweir Air Base and the same as any other airport and airbase in your product?

OK, take off from airbase from dark and cold. 35 minutes of flight and return to the boat. Trap, park, wait five minutes on ground idle, shut down (following NATOPS within DCS constraints). After shut down, waited few moments, and startup. All good, ready to go. In short, I failed to reproduce this bug on my end. Maybe its a MP thing?

When Hornet was introduced to DCS years ago, I created a cold startup procedure for my use, which was based on Wags video, NATOPS, and the manual. I just tried and it works without any problems by doing step - by - step. It involves starting up both engines completely but there is no need for "as fast as". Cold start no problem. After engine shutdown I will test next. Also, as per requirements for bug posting, must have a track to prove it.

Cool feature then. Nice. If you want zone to follow unit during mission you need trigger condition unit in moving zone, then select zone and unit. It works with circular zones and no longer works with zone being offset from unit centre.

Best to wait for the ATC overhaul that was mentioned few times will also influence other flights comms. I think there was a comment once that there is also a plan to redo callsigns. Maybe the new callsigns were added to support that development effort but it is simply not ready yet.

Hi there. My understanding is that there is a typo in trigger condition name, am I right? Group member fuel less then, Group member fuel more then, Should be: Less than, More than. Thank you for the condition though, something I always had to use the mist for before. Sorry, can't attach track as this is in ME.