Gierasimov

So.. no official announcement, right? From what I understood so far, OctopusG just introduced I-16 to the shop without prior notice? Same for the Fitter? One day it will just become the first line of a change log?

Really, learning the cockpit in Cyrillic is not as bad as it sounds. I am all in for EN cockpit option though for people who can't do that. People can have different capacity of learning as well. I am with draconus on this one, Soviet jet, Soviet tech, let it be in original language as designed and produced. As I said, Hind has got the EN cockpit option, people can use it if they want, it does not bother me, coz on my PC, in my DCS World all is set to what I want...

Provided you fly by the book, otherwise AI can sometimes disregard what you are doing and ...

..oh some light source will be there for sure.

But still ED provided for Hind, we'll see. If it's a selling point for people then it will be from day 1. But... We still need official announcement it is happening

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Cyrillic labels. Quick to learn as well. I am sure there will be EN option as well, at some point.

So, from chrome cockpit renders to a short flight with startup in such a short time span? Wonder when was the video taken then. Promising definitely. Let's see if those papers get signed in time for the next newsletter announcement

Yep! Same thoughts. Nice to see Su-22M4.

Hi Does anybody know what options should be set to reliably use AI to throw TALDS in a general direction of a threat? Be it enemy fighters or SAM sites? So far it worked once for me - Attack map object, then I changed clouds type and it stopped dropping them. Changed back to what it was and it does not work anymore either.

Time will show. Presently we don't know what we don't know. Seems that Mudhen is close, I agree.

SVKSniper said he was in touch with a 3rd party but it wasn't

Perhaps they can even secure a license to bring it to DCS at some point. Whatever OctopusG is up to.

Still, FC3 and even MiG-29 separate module available. It does not matter anyways but it felt wierd...

Anyway, when BigNewy says the license for the Fitter is not obtained by a 3rd party I trust the man. Shame that Octopus does not want to talk here.

You seem to misunderstood the context of this SD, but that's ok. It was 'does it make sense for OctopusG to make Su-17 for another game or simulator' If it does to them and it does not to us, then we are not getting Su-17 form them...

Ask the creator to stop the mission and resave with waypoints correctly set. Ask the creator to provide target elevation data and use avionics to set it.

Yes To me a Su-17/22 out of DCS world wouldn't make sense at all Question is what makes sense to the OctopusG guy.

I had a mission in the past where I was using the UNIT IN ZONE trigger. AI had weapon hold and triggered action with advanced action WEAPONS FREE, triggered when I entered the zone. It worked back then but I can't find the mission now. This however was a particular case where it was me running the intercept and not the other way around.

As far as I remember DCS maxes out whatever GPU has, it kind of reserves what is there. At least that was the case for me in GTX1080Ti and now RTX 3080 as well as friends 3090. Optimizing the game is always welcomed, but to me as an option and not a balance to fit all, as this is virtually impossible. I am maxing out, if I can't but I want I will go new hardware way. That's me and I get it that many people cannot go like that, fine, but I don't want to be "punished". I am all in for a highest quality looks at a fraction of hardware resources once that becomes possible in DCS. Other than that, DCS is what governs my hardware expenses.

Откуда ты знаешь, что это для DCS?

Then this would be a nice to have: 2x buttons = fast (full) deflection - kicking the rudder 2x buttons = steady deflection curve with hold mode - thing you are asking for 1 x button = reset to center position Maybe move to the wish list?

Hi Gaz, I resaved your ARTILLERY LOG JAM.trk as .miz and checked in ME that the particular group was a bit strange. Unit names were blank or contained negative values (such as -1 or -2) whatever caused it. I tried moving them to different spot on the map, tried replacing the units, renaming them but still arty would not move at all. Then I removed the group. In the attached .miz you will see that I tried with two groups, one for China with newer units (4 tanks 2 SPGs) and Russia with units you originally selected. BOTH groups move their steel without issues now it seems. Check it out mate. ARTILLERY LOG JAM.miz

Last night I let loose 6 of them and offset 45 degrees right when fighting Ace level J-11. It seemed to me it went for TALDs initially and I had a bit of breathing room. Needs more testing I think as it was too late for me to watch the track.

That is a good thing. That's why I put those three things there as well. To see them modelled one day. I know that the fire physics / dynamics are planned (or maybe even actively worked on), as ED wanted to bring fire bomb to the Hornet. We'll see. But if ED terrain tech allowed for land to be 'reshaped' based on physical interaction, it would be the next level mind-blowing tech. Searching online, one could find such a tech available for the entire globe but this isn't the place to discuss here. Yaeah, simulation would be nice foundation for the rest of DCS aspects. As said, I am with you.

As far as I remember my \ radio menu does not work when I am airborne in Hornet, only on the ground. When I use transmit switch F10 is there.