NineLine

1) What control setup do you have? With my WW set up, including extension, I do not find it at all twitchy. Do you have a lot of experience with DCS Warbirds? This can be a common concern with people coming to DCS, especially Warbirds. 2) I have not flown it as much as maybe others have, but I do not feel compelled to do any more trimming than I would expect. 3) This sounds like a 'feeling' thing I personally do not any experience in the real one, but I also do not seem to notice this much, perhaps linked back to the control setup you use. Do you have a track? 3?) It wasn't the fastest out there, but do you have some speed comparisons based on real-world factual data that we can look at? Feelings dont really help. 4) Some of this can be tuned in options, but a reasonable report would be more helpful, I think. They have already made some sound improvements. 5) This requires a report with tracks, you need to show them this happening in action, otherwise they are guessing at what you are experiencing and how or what led to the issue. By replying to your comments, I am not suggesting the F4U is done, complete and perfect yet, but these comments in many cases are not totally helpful without tracks, backing evidence, ect. You took the time to write this, which I am sure they will appreciate, but without more info, your effort might be wasted if they are not expanded on. ] Thanks.

I would think the team building this chair would need to address this; if needed, they could reach out to us to discuss. But we cannot make changes for one piece of hardware without the ability to verify or confirm what is actually needed.

There is an English cockpit which is separate from Avionics Language. Sounds like maybe you are changing the Language setting, which is for the entire sim GUI.

As stated, we are working on a new and improved reflection system; it has not progressed as far as we would like, but the issue is known and reported. That said, in that time we implemented a slider as a work around where you can adjust the strength of the reflections, while I am not sure if its functional in all modules yet, it is working in the Dora, see the image below.

Thanks I will take a look at this soon.

Please include a track.

Is this still an issue?

Please make a short single-player track showing the issue, thanks.

Yes

Currently, there are no plans for these as it's not correct for an unmodified 9.12A, sorry.

Thanks for the report, the Anti-Ice System has not be implemented yet and is still on the roadmap to be added, thanks.

I don't think so, let me chase it up again.

FIrst rule of Timeline club is we dont talk about timelines But the team is hard at it. Love to hear feedback etc as well from people that have been there.

Hey all, sorry for the late reply, it seems like perhaps the pitot switch may be backwards, there is already a reported issue of the pitot not freezing when the pitot heat is off. I have added this track and info to that report, thanks!

Please supply a track, thanks.

Sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Improvements to this area have already been requested for a while.

I'll see if I can find some answers.

Added the ability to designate an AWACS surveillance (SURV) Multi-Sensor Integration (MSI) track file as the Launch and Steering (L&S) or Designated Target 2 (DT2). This is a work in progress with expected changes/improvements later. When finalized, an instructional video will be provided. Known issues: AIM-120 desync issues (not strictly an MSI issue, but rather more visible because of it) Half-sized HAFU for MSI track in TWS radar mode. Missing L&S, MSI-only tracks on SA page. Incorrect AIM-120 RWR warnings from MSI-only launches. Incorrect HMD indication of MSI-only targets as friendly. All MSI targets should be in the priority ranking matrix. Low priority tracks presentation missing. HAFU's missing proper MEM flashing logic based on contributing source. L&S Trackfile losing radar contribution causes the trackfile to be deleted and requires re-designating.

It is reported still, and I have bumped the issue internally. Thanks

Consider this more like a tease you might see at the end of the Beyond videos, you dont get much, but you know its coming.

Please go by official announcements. Things can be teased or shown that might not be announced yet, or later were removed from the plan, etc. Focus on all the exciting things we announced, and don't worry about the non-announced items until they are announced. Our assets are in varying stages of readiness; they might make the occasional guest spot here and there.

I wasn't trying to convince you of anything, so that makes sense.

Sounds like it might be a setting or something, happy to take a look

That would be a question for them.

He would just need to propose it to us, and we could consider it if it meets all requirements.