NineLine

Please include a track.

Is this still an issue?

Please make a short single-player track showing the issue, thanks.

Yes

Currently, there are no plans for these as it's not correct for an unmodified 9.12A, sorry.

Thanks for the report, the Anti-Ice System has not be implemented yet and is still on the roadmap to be added, thanks.

I don't think so, let me chase it up again.

FIrst rule of Timeline club is we dont talk about timelines But the team is hard at it. Love to hear feedback etc as well from people that have been there.

Hey all, sorry for the late reply, it seems like perhaps the pitot switch may be backwards, there is already a reported issue of the pitot not freezing when the pitot heat is off. I have added this track and info to that report, thanks!

Please supply a track, thanks.

Sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Improvements to this area have already been requested for a while.

I'll see if I can find some answers.

Added the ability to designate an AWACS surveillance (SURV) Multi-Sensor Integration (MSI) track file as the Launch and Steering (L&S) or Designated Target 2 (DT2). This is a work in progress with expected changes/improvements later. When finalized, an instructional video will be provided. Known issues: AIM-120 desync issues (not strictly an MSI issue, but rather more visible because of it) Half-sized HAFU for MSI track in TWS radar mode. Missing L&S, MSI-only tracks on SA page. Incorrect AIM-120 RWR warnings from MSI-only launches. Incorrect HMD indication of MSI-only targets as friendly. All MSI targets should be in the priority ranking matrix. Low priority tracks presentation missing. HAFU's missing proper MEM flashing logic based on contributing source. L&S Trackfile losing radar contribution causes the trackfile to be deleted and requires re-designating.

It is reported still, and I have bumped the issue internally. Thanks

Consider this more like a tease you might see at the end of the Beyond videos, you dont get much, but you know its coming.

Please go by official announcements. Things can be teased or shown that might not be announced yet, or later were removed from the plan, etc. Focus on all the exciting things we announced, and don't worry about the non-announced items until they are announced. Our assets are in varying stages of readiness; they might make the occasional guest spot here and there.

I wasn't trying to convince you of anything, so that makes sense.

Sounds like it might be a setting or something, happy to take a look

That would be a question for them.

He would just need to propose it to us, and we could consider it if it meets all requirements.

Can you post an updated track for me please? Thanks!

You are both correct; that is why it's optional.

Yes, it is ok when based on the documentation we have on these two items that the AH-64D has the skip bit test, whereas the AAQ-33 does not. As always, if you have evidence available from a publicly shared source, we would be happy to review it.

No, research alone for the Zero has been going on for an incredibly long time. It was more about making sure we could do it to the expected level that people expect from a DCS Warbird. We were happy to have M3 doing a module that will fit in nicely with the Hellcat and Zero, but they were not held for the release of any other module. Thanks!

We, ED, are doing a Zero.