Bananabrai

Eigentlich nur im multiplayer...

Tritt bei mir auch hin und wieder auf. Zur Zeit vermehrt auf Tonopah oder auf dem Beatty airfield.

Did not kow that it has no effect. Similar to the Tornado BOZ. It had chaff to no end but only 28 flares.

Since when has the Viggen NVG? :huh:

For me it worked fine without any login... used the discord link... Also I think it's a good manner to ask the community. Just hope they show the results and wonder if they stick to the voted priority. Maybe they are at a point where it doesnt make a difference what they start next, in terms of "obvious, logical or fincial". Just take that into account.

Only certain combinations are possible. You can combine a few things, but not to many. Just ask if you need support on that.

No smoke pods on the viggen.

:joystick: Just need a bit of Scotland and a GR.1B for that to join this awesome setting. :D

Finally a campaign from you for a module that I own and love! (Viggen? :helpsmilie:) And "Hollywood" sounds great, love story driven! Will there be something like a TARPS RECON style mission? Just one ping would be enough, Vasili... :pilotfly:

About LASER accuracy: The A400M DIRCM is able steer an approaching FOX2 away from it by pointing a LASER into the right spot of the sensor. Don't ask me about the range, thats not public of course. But a big turning Cargo plane (-> the senors are not very close to the aerodynmic center and/or CG and are turning well inside this axis system already) and a small and fast tunring missile is good example how accurate systems can be.

Thanks NineLine G34, G35 and the quad area G36-G39 is working fine for C-130 & B707 (KC135,...) size. havent tested B-1s, they should fit as well. B-52s are indeed a bit to big, but they should fit F79, F58 (& F56), although the last is where the Thunderbirds are if I remember correctly.

1. is doable pretty easy. You just have to do it after every update, clients only (AI does not work) inside: programs/DCS/database/scripts edit the file: me_route.lua somewhere at line 150 copy over the attributes form the helos over to the planes

Finde auch, dass der Vergleich etwas hinkt, aber eher aus einem anderen Grund. Wenn man sich als "anders" (egal in welchem Bereich) autet wird man eher von Fragen, kommentaren und "Fachwissen" überhäuft. Ich dränge meine Lebenseinstellungen niemanden auf. Zumal ich auch glaube, wenn sich jeder VR nutzer hier meldet, sähe das anders aus. Hätte immer mal Bock auf nen Beamer gehabt, bin nie dazu gekommen. Bin immernoch am Monitor. Dieser A-10 Guru auf Youtube hat doch so nen krasses beamer layout. Komm grad nicht auf dem Namen.

Is someone from ED reading this? Where do I at least find the "getStandList" from Nevada/Nellis, so I can modifie the available space of certain parking slots.

No, this is a separat point

And: Fix to inaccurate ELINT-analysis. Is ELINT a bit more accurate now?

I had tankers and Transports for another test. Very same behaviour.

Is there a list what Y-Channels are working for AA? Is only 20Y broken? I have 6 tankers, set to 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60, all Y. We only testen the 20Y one yesterday in MP.

07/2020: The issue with a Y channel TACAN for AA/Tanker persists. The behaviour was inconsistant across different platforms. Tanker: 20Y F-14 clients: had no info at all on either 20Y or 20X F-18 clients: had no info on 20Y, got a range and heading on 20X leading to ghost signal F-5 clients: same as F-18 F-16 clients: same as F-14 (as far as I remember) Thought that was fixed a last year. Can provide a track file if needed

MiG-23MLA has an IRST/EOS? Not that I know of. I know that the -29A has one, and starting from the Su-27 they had EOS integrated.

How high are they flying? Could be a problem due to altitude. I think even AI has a problem with lasing below 10.000 ft. It is genraly known that the GBU-24 is not tracking (bug). But -12 and -10 should work, at least for clients.

Are you saying this as a F-14 pilot/RIO? Sounds like you were flying not in one, but against one. - F-14 too tanky Damage model? Just because it doesn't explode it does not mean it's working as intendet. I would say it is one of the best damage models, if not the best, it even was out of the box back then. - Undefeatable radar? Yeah, RIOs would indeed laugh about that. Just because your RWR still reports a lock unexperienced RIOs still have hard work to keep a lock, not to mention mister-"Sorry, I lost the lock" in the backseat. - AIM-54 was maybe OP, can't remember it, however it is UP atm. But hey, if ED is fideling with the missile behaviour, what could they do? At least HB is working porperly on their modules.

Only one of those NW ones is choosable for large aircrft (I guess it was 09) North of Golfs there are 4 to choose for large A/C (G29, etc. I think its was) And then there is E13, very far NE corner of the airfield. Thats it, there are no others to choose.

From the Flight OPS: Primary Runway Designation. 4.1.2. RWY 21 is the calm wind runway. When prevailing headwind/tailwind component exceeds 10 knots, the runway most nearly aligned with the winds will be designated the active runway. 4.1.3. RWY 03 will be used daily from 2200L to 0800L for departures and RWY 21 for arrivals unless winds , air traffic volume or operational requirements dictate otherwise So 03 woulf be mainly for night time ops then...

I wonder what "scheme" the AI follows to choose a takeoff and landing RWY. I tried several headwind settings for the genreall direction 03 and 21 up to 15 knots @ 3000MSL Always tried multiple A/C for arrival and departure per test. (placed them equaly spaced on the airfield and in air arround it) AI always seems to take off from 03R, only once it choose 03L, even with 10-15 knots tailwind AI always uses 21 for landing, most of the time 21L, even with 15 knots tailwind. Takeoff @03R and landing @21L is a bad combination... it's the same... If many AI-A/C are waiting for recovery, its getting crowed north of the field. Bad for clients. In addition to that most departure procedures do a west bound / north bound (left) turn after takeing off from 03. (FYTTR (+low), DREAM (+low), TAC-west/-north) So they cross the approach sector of 21R. In low wind conditions I would preffer having everyone (AI) for T/O at 03L and simultaneously having 03R for arrival. I know that 21 is used most of times, because of noise, but then at least 21L + 03L would be better than indeterminable or 03R + 21L...