Eaglewings

Those were really good times with the EF2000. These are without doubt exciting times in dcs. Watching the development of this module with very keen interest. I am very happy to learn about this.

Welcome Jan and TrueGrit to DCS community. What an amazing news for me to hear that the EF2000 is coming to dcs. This aircraft is a huge part of my formative years in flightsim [Famous EF200 super back in the days]. To have it in DCS would be a dream come through. I hope you succeed in this project and wishing you all the best. My support is sure in the form of an instant purchase when ready. Cheers

Okay good. Keeping my fingers crossed then. I appreciate your response and thanks for this great carrier landing training mission.

Thanks so much Bankler for this official spring update. Just by the way question. Would we be seeing the mission integrated into the soon to be released Supercarrier?

My VR experience with the JF-17 was not that good and yes the F-16, FA-18C and F-14 were better for me. All the caution panels were unreadable. I must say this experience is subject to my system and headset though. With the same setting on my vr headset, the Viper, Hornet and Tomcat cockpit were way better. I do not want to get a module that I will not fly much with those modules mentioned above in my hangar already.

Innovative product I must say. All of the video I saw about it were tested on a racing sim. It would be great to have review of the G force seat in a flight sim especially in fast fighter jet. 40 pounds of g-force is what it induce on the body, wonder how that compare to how many gs fast jet produce. Interestingly, I see DCS is supported on their list of flightsims.

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic?url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums%2Eeagle%2Eru%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D267050&share_tid=267050&share_fid=74365&share_type=t&link_source=app I got my issue with the vvsl option (sometimes would show, cannot designate and slew if I am able to selected) sorted out after reading the linked thread above. Something to do with flir switch in standby position at mission start by default. Setting it to off at mission start before turning it on to initialize works for me. It is has been reported to ED btw. Tried with just tgp pod loaded and worked pretty good.

Good find. This could explain why the new vvsl option playing hide and seek on me on the flir page sometimes and I am not able to designate ground and slew around. I will check if this explains my problem or if it is something else.

. I was unable to designate with vvls box so I could slew in my case. Got to look at it some more. Thanks for the response.

Is it with certain weapons that one can designate and slew the pod with the vvsl introduced? I was unable to designate and slew the cursor in the flir screen with vvsl boxed. When unboxed, I could designate and slew. Perhaps I have to relearn the whole tgp again.

Welcome. Tremendous information here in the forum. And the people here are very helpful too. Cheers.

I was particular about the throttle quadrant of the T-16000M. I think the T-16000m throttle has a closer semblance of the FA-18 throttle than that of the F-16 in design and button representation.

4gb? This large size could be coming from terrain fixes.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4250614 I believe from Wags explanation, time is the limiting factor in this integration.

I currently use the T-16000m throttle combined with the warthog stick. Close replica of the real FA-18C hotas. These two works very well with dcs. Mapping buttons on both controllers can be independently done with no issues. I do not use the thrustmaster target software by the way.

Under the circumstances we presently are experiencing globally, a 15 days delay should be understandable.

Glad to have a chance to try out the JF-17 and the M-2000c mirage which have been on my watch. Wishing all good health and happy flying. Thanks ED for this gesture.

Great to know this campaign is making good progress at mission 14. Great job Baltic Dragon. Stay safe and all the best.

Someone mentioned that tweaking vr. Settings works generally for wmr headset. Please no intention to derail the thread guys.

I am using odyssey + now and the 1060 is holding up on average settings. The plan is to see how the new 3000 series Nvidia gpu card for the year will perform and then do an upgrade. Only then will I be looking at the Reverb.

I will give it a try again and compare results. It can only get better for me if all goes well. There may have been other limiting factors then as I tried it on bit weaker system (laptop). Now will see how it goes with the desktop system.

Correct I do not really know why it did that in my case. Since I play with no issues with default settings, I do not really bother changing anything in there. I just go by the rule of do not fix it if not broken for now.

Play becomes jittery and micro stuttering becomes frequent with some artifacts. Happened the two times I uncommented those lines in 2.5.5 and reverted back to default. Never bothered to change anything again just not to upset present vr play. I can say I followed the instructions but it did not give me desired results compared to leaving it as is.

I have the odyssey +. I found out from my experience that changing settings in vr default setting file is counter productive. So I have it as it is and vr game play is good without major issues.

Thanks Kato217. Followed your method and Bankler carrier landing training mission works for me in 2.5.6.