Pman

agreed 1.2.4

Got it to work on headless (I think) If you connect via RDP the problem is that the server "locks" behind you, similar to hitting ctrl, alt and del to lock a pc To prevent this, go to start, then run, then use this command tscon 1 /dest:console This will disconnect a server session without logging out behind you Pman

Yup I will +1 this Good Decision

Exactly right, the game is extremely unstable at the moment and without it being fixed there is little incentive to do anything else

Having been on the wing of one, I can assure you it feels like mountain climbing lol

DCS F86 and Mig 15 have been confirmed by ED so we can talk about it now :) Its in the works, watch this space...

Confirmed that it wont be coming until the Edge release

Mig-15 has already been announced by ED some months ago, well before RRG came into the DCS fold

Just to confirm this is spam and Nothing to do with the Virtual Aerobatics Server Pman

Well I know that we need them in DCS:W for the Virtual Aerobatics server as we have already decided to stick with DCS:W for my server. I think it will mainly be for airshows and freeflight servers that will see a combination of Eurofighters and Spitfires :) Pman

Other then aircraft that I know are being done already I'd take a Harrier Gr9 followed by a Mossie I think. I like the idea of a Hunter as well Pman

I agree that the B17 would be brought by alot of people, although a nice gesture I think something like that should really be kept for the latter stages of when you want to sell products. Dont give all your aces away during a KS programme ;) Are you doing an AFM for the 262 anyway? or would it be flyable with SFM for the extra $50k target? If the former I would say thats a good target to put in and more likely to be achieved within the time thats left. Thats where my vote would go, a flyable 262 over a potentional $100k needed for another fighter. But whatever you decide you should do it quickly :pilotfly:

A lower stretch goal would help My personal opinion would be SE england first and then the B17, simply as a take off/landing area for the P47 and Spit Pman

Blistering time mate, absolute perfection :) Sub 90 seconds next?

Its an awesome post as well, took me about an hour to understand it all mind though lol

Funny I said almost the same thing to him last time I met him! Those Diagrams you drew at the time Yo-yo still baffle me lol

Yes this was a hack. I have spoken to a couple of guys who managed to do it, it uses a very very simply sfm and the engine start/off doesnt work along with most other things. Pman

Really interesting Yo-Yo, I love the level of detail that you go into with your work :) Be Proud Pman

Not quite true ;)

I'd look at Edge coming in the summer if I were you ;) You may see some of Nevada this year, but from what I've been told it wont be in edge Pman

Just to add a point here, Dan wasnt commenting on the effectiveness of the rudder per say, more like how little physical movement it takes to move the rudder a large amount. Something more akin to calibration of the rudder pedals then the effectiveness of the control surface. I do know what you mean tho having got some flight time myself in Warrior 2's, Super Cubs and an Extra 300L Pman

Sith is right, This isnt about previous projects, that said I would be cautious about any project I am asked to invest in where I havent seen at least proof of concept (which I though was a requirement to be announced as a 3rd party by ED for DCS?) Pman

Your right, I noticed that as well

That is the point tho, this Kick starter is entirely about marketing and public relations. There is nothing else to go on yet is there? that's the point.... I find it very hard to believe after speaking to the varying 3rd parties that I do that there isnt some renders by an artist or something somewhere. If there isnt then they have a massive task to build 3+ DCS level aircraft within a year and get them to beta at least by September 2014 If they really are that far in its infancy then I have my doubts about the timeline for delivery. As I said I actually met Ilya at Flying Legends in July and was very impressed with his obvious passion and enthusiasm for this project. At the moment we are going on goodwill, I have nothing against the project, far from it. I would love to see it succeed massively. But for anykind of financial commitment there has to be some give and take. Up till now we havent see much to backup the project is all I am saying. I'd be willing to bet that if some renders of actual aircraft, or tanks or whatever appeared on the kick starter people would actually start to believe in the potential for this. You're right in that Ilya has said that the project is early on, and people will take that into account when looking at their work so far, but without something $375k is alot to ask for, never mind $1m

Chaos you yourself are acting like a "whining baby" I was fully behind this and very impressed when I learnt the details of it at legends. However the execution of it has been poor. considering there is say 1200 backers and we are at best 200k short of the first stretch goal it would take a monumental effort to convince everyone to more than double their existing offers I personally will up mine if we start seeing some actual product, at the moment all we have seen is a bit of terrain which doesnt interest me. Show me a render of the P47 cockpit or the external model of the 109 and I will start to be more convinced. But to be honest I think the stretch goals were always exactly that, I could imagine when this project started getting 150-200k but I couldn't ever imagine it hitting $1m that was just crazy. Don't get me wrong should renders of ilya's work actually start showing up then I will bang the war drums and get VA to support it. But till then I'm not going to bust my gut for it. It will fund anyway at the base $100k