USA_Recon

not to kick a dead horse here, however: When testing some fps and settings for my Reverb, I did find quite a difference in fps based on the map, so there is certainly a correlation here. ie. on a popular mp server (104th). mission #1 Caucus - spawn in at Sochi. 45 fps. Flight was consistent 43-48 fps mission #2 Persian Gulf - spawn in at Kish. 60 fps. Flight was consistent 55-60 fps Both flown in F-15. So I do fully believe the map itself is a major part of the fps.

like why doesn't the software just handle this - it's so hodge podge. Like, yes, I want the new features - can you install them ?

so, this is soooo confusing ok, so I have a vap file - now what. copy what ? what 'category' - this is terrible documentation by the way. Like how do I 'copy over my existing profile' - how about instructions like 'goto this folder, find this file, copy it over' etc.. I already did a 702 command copy and paste, so what is this for ?

Save your money for pimax 8kx - will be the top dog Going to hopefully get a 3080 to go with it .. should be a good year for VR and a bad year for my wallet lol But no way would I get a 5plus - if you wanted lower end the Artisan looks good for the $

There are definitely map difference. Using 104th server as an example: PG map - Kish AF, spawn in F-15: 60 fps - maintain 60 for most the entire mission Caucus map, spawn in F-15, 40 fps, after takeoff more like 45

That would be great!

we all keep praying for it -so don't stop, any glimmer of hope of the best superiority aircraft ever made in DCS getting revamped... even if not clickable, I wouldn't mind seeing an updated radar

definitely

Messing around with this caused me some issues where after testing, changing back to 90 and then SteamVR would load and still say 60. I had to completely reinstall everything to eventually get it fixed

MSAA is not needed. Depends on your card, but I've had better visuals and stability by leaving PD at 1.0, no MSAA. AF 16 is fine. Then go into your super sampling software (ie. SteamVR) and increase there instead of via DCS. I run my Reverb at 150% SS.

Is that how it works IRL ?

Similar experience here. VE is a big jump, takes some adaptation and tweaking until you get it where you need it to be enjoyable. After that it can be hard to go back to 2D :)

This can be set via the GUI now btw

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=250686

There is a utility for this that ED provides support for this

Is there a good tutorial on setting this up ?

But is it IC compliant ?

Plugged in a TrackIR after months of VR. i could never play this game on a 2d monitor again. I'd honestly rather not fly. Being in the 3D cockpit world is a must. The sad thing is, ED hasn't done much to help with visibility, it's been an age old issue, but I think the current cop out is 'our 2.5 engine can't be fixed so let's wait years for Vulkan'. Case in point, I have to zoom in to see contrails that pop in and out of existence. Terrible contrast with a dark sky above a white horizon, disappearing missile trails from a distance, etc... The problem isn't VR in the end, it's the game engine of DCS is woefully behind and the devs aren't able to fix it.

Thanks for sharing your mod - this is much much better. I hope ED is reading and seeing this - someday will be fixed without a need for the mod. Again thanks - the pros of the mod far outweigh the cons

So the end result was online this capped my frames at 30 fps. Enabling motionvector capped my frames at 45 online.

I can confirm this - friendly track IFF'd as friendly, shows as enemy in Datalink.

Not sure why they would do this - would be same with Index or any WMR head setup. Why wouldn't they just let SteamVR handle it - I trust SteamVR with their constant work on the product over something ED would do ?

+1

Is it possible to put an image file into this ?

is there any list of what changes this mod provides ?