hazzer

Hi all, I assume this shouldnt be so low res? Any idea how to fix?

Hi, On the latest open beta I am having an issue where my cursor disappears in VR and locks onto clickable items. The cursor appears occasionally before vanishing again. This happened last updcs.logdate in the Hind only, now appears to be in all aircraft. Cannot attach log as it is too large. Using WMR/Steamvr

I will look forward to giving them. I hope you do understand my frustration as the Yak has been missing many fundamentals of the sim, namely an effective LOD model meaning it effects people in multiplayer who aren't even flying it. Generally I love the Yak but it shouldn't be wip for this long. Many thanks, Harry.

You and your team need to come up with some specifics other than being vauge as usual. It has been out now for 3 years with essentially 0 updates. As a customer it is only fair to expect these products to be completed in a reasonable time frame. Obviously the Yak wasn't as popular as the others but leaving it this long with the same statement being made for the last 2 years is just not acceptable. The last thread on this subject was locked, I think it is fair to leave this open for updates and comments to be pushed through here. I will look forward to future updates on this aircraft.

This sounds like the same issue I have had here I can see a few threads with this issue. But no support from ED? Hopefully it gets reported and fixed.

But we don't?... I haven't seen any in all the years of me intentionally abusing the engines.

Such a fire would lead to actual aircraft damage, not just flames. Mags can fowl when idling at a too low rpm and too fuel rich. Poor engine management, that's how.

This is exaclty true. @BIGNEWY @NineLine @Wags We would appreciate a timeline/actual sign of action being taken to fix and pull the Yak out of beta.

They have rubbed enough salt in the wounds, although at this point them trying to sell us a yak 52 II with the promise of it being fixed wouldn't suprise me. Heck they might even fit the unfinished ns430 to it as the icing on the cake!

Can someone please look into this from ED and fix.

Is this being investigated? Not sure why it is marked as "opinion" becuase it is not.

Would love this fixed also

The issue with the sounds has now progressed to drowning out other aircraft in multiplayer.. A CEII shouldn't be louder than 2 p-51s

It is so disappointing to see it all laid out like that. No comment from ED on this either. I remeber sometime near the end of the year one of them stated some of the team would be working on the yak at the start of this year, which then was pushed back further. It seems they are treating customers like mugs and take advantage of people's willingness to take a gamble on early access.

Glad to see it isn't just me having this issue. Yeah that's the only solution I have found to stop it just to test I set my page file stupidly high and no difference. Seems like a memory leak associated with vr

The whole physics of aircraft flying off field needs to be looked into. I imagine it is at the bottom of the list of priorities however. Some aircraft like the f18 for some reason can taxi, land on any grass, even almost 80° slopes on Mountian sides! But then other aircraft touch the grass and either explode, stick to it, or get stuck. The warbirds which should be fine on grass have a very weird feeling where the grassy areas are glue like and the aircraft easily crash. We need some consistency with what should/shouldn't work. Then the ability to add off airport operations would work much much better.

Ah, that's understood

If there is an issue please post it in a seperate bug thread. Let's keep the focus on this thread in wondering where the progress is!

What I find completely unacceptable is that we haven't had any response from ED on this and any other unfinished module. Whilst they are busy parading the next big module. I don't know what the allocation of tasks is like amongst the team but they really need to focus on fixing and actually finishing one module at a time.

Yeha that's correct. What is strange is that in dcs one ipd setting doesn't match all the aircraft. So one setting works for the a10 but no the p51. That is due to an error on EDs part.

I have grown tired of asking for module updates that we have paid for with the understanding they will be completed in a reasonable time. The effort to maintain them with updates does not happen either. I am very dissapointed in a lot of these products. The fact ED doesn't even acknowledge they have done us dirty or have a realistic plan to bring all the unfinished modules up to par after been out for literal years is not acceptable. They have a serious issue of letting things slide and re allocate and use the lack of manpower excuse, which just suggests to me they shouldn't be creating so many aircraft as this will problem will only get worse.

interesting... I have never actually use reprojection in steam or wmr. I disabled it as it gave a similar effect thinking back (however not as severe).

Any help?

Possible same issue as me https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/270222-fps-tank-when-changing-aircraft-or-server/?tab=comments#comment-4651067

This is still an issue