razo+r

Well, the best advise I can give you is to look through the topics linked yourself and build your own opinion with all the material and documents presented in these topics.

Both say they modelled it according to the specification and documentation they have...

Can you upload a short track? Perhaps an empty mission but with the same coordinates? So we can see if you are doing something wrong or if it's something else.

If you use the search function, you will see that this topic has been discussed quite extensivly, both by ED and HB.

Did you also set the elevation correctly? Can you confirm with the TGP that the steerpoint is om target? Did you press CZ? If employing JDAMs, did you lase for at least 3 seconds prior to drop?

Can you upload a track?!

Is your anti virus quarantining any files? Have you removed all mods?

As far as I know it was always off?

https://skybrary.aero/articles/precision-approach-radar-par

The gun ammo is a box with percentage below the fuel slider.

Unload all gun ammo? Force them to use a specific type of weapon with the advanced waypoint options?

Uh, that's weird. It works just fine for me, and I haven't changed anything. Are you trying to rearm from the start of the mission or did you fly and land and try it that way?

No, I mean mods, not modules/DLC's. Mods like for example the A-4E, Grinellis F-22 etc. In the new launcher go to the "files" tab and on the right side you should get the "repair" option.

If there are no winds, the HUD shouldnt be offset. There is also no reason why the offset is caused by the map, unless you have a corrupted install or are doing something wrong. If there was truly a bug, more people would complain/report it. Make sure you remove all of your mods and run a full repair, and then try to reproduce it and save the track. Thats the easiest way to see what it could be.

A track is more helpful than a screenshot. HUD being offset is usually because of wind, unless you mean tilting due to INS drifting, be it due to no GPS available or the NAV switch being in NAV instead of IFA. But yep, we'll only be able to tell for certain if we get a short track.

Where's the track? What aircraft? You mention carrier and Caucasus. Do you see the same behaviour on other maps? What about airfields on Caucasus? What's the wind setting? Are you intercepting the Glideslope at the correct distance/altitude ratio? Upload a track. So many questions...

Glaub schon. Ist an der gleichen Rumpfseitenstation bzw unter dem Rumpf zu finden. Ja es sind 2 verschiedene. Stell sicher dass der historische Filter (Armbanduhr unten im Editor) ausgeschaltet ist.

The radar has different modes, doppler being one of them. But it also has non-dopplers modes that don't filter out static targets. And by reading the linked topics, PAL seems to not use doppler, making locking onto ships possible.

A carrier broadside has a bigger RCS than a flanker headon. It makes sense that the radar picks the one with the bigger RCS. Some more info:

Not modeled. Icing on airframe is module dependant. Most only have pitot icing, and like 2 only have icing on canopy/airframe.

Can you confirm all these actions are correctly performed ingame?

Move your head back, you basically glued your eyes to the dashboard. RCtrl+Rshift+zoom button on the numpad.

Remember, if you are having issues, add as much detail as possible. We cannot guess what buttons you use or what procedure you use. A track generally also helps depending on the issue.

Can you upload a track or at least the mission?

A very descriptive post...