Kev2go

yea that would be awesome

its documented in the A10C dash 1 manual in a 2012 publication. ( its still up on scribd) Having the ability to delete markpoints certainly would no longer be a anachronistic feature if we have Hog with Scorpion HMD, as that came in 2013.

actually i realized its not so much the displaying in greenscale vs greyscale as i thought For whatever reason since the last few updates the EO mode of targeting pods redering are so bright by default that i just cant read information on them unless i drastically adjust brightness knobs It always wasn't like this

indeed. Disapointing that ED cant even be bothered to include SAM threat rings into the A10C TAD page when that TAD feature isnt even needed to be SADL dependent but based on pre planned information like you already have included in other modules like Viper and Hornet.

Even though this display type is more akin to a Super Hornet Im gonna go to using this mod because I find it harder to view FLIR page from the Hornets old DDI's. versus other modules that have LCD colour displays with FLIR in greyscale.

ED cant even get a delete mark point function added on the CDU even though its noted in the dash 1 manual.......

Im not talking about Module. Yes everyone know it is old simplified FC3 module. I am talking about how it should perform. also remember some of the last air superiority eagles made had APG70 of Strike eagle. and also remember the APG63 PSP then got a upgrade to the APG63 v1 sometime in the 90s. So no I wouldn't expect a 90s - 2000s era eagle to have less processing power than the APG68.

F15 also has a radar that uses MPRF. its just like in the Hornet the radar is better as pilot can Interleave MPRF with HPRF or manually decide to use a dedicated mode, wheras the viper only used MPRF full time. and can only used HPRF in VS mode. So the F15 is by no means limited. ON paper the APG63 PSP should be better than AP68 in pretty much every way. even more so if it were APG 63 V1.

I found proof that it was It was used on USAF F16C block 50s. SOme claimed this wasnt used for a Circa 2007 Viper This is a F16C block 50 #91-0353 from Shaw Air force base in 2007. 77th Fighter Squadron. https://www.f-16.net/g3/f-16-photos/album38/album64/91-0353_001 F16C block 50 # 94-041 77th FS Red flag 2009. F16C block 50 #91-0345 from the 77th FS Red Flag mission at Nellis AFB on July 21st, 2010 https://www.f-16.net/g3/f-16-photos/album38/album64/91-0345_002

I want to see that ED pickup the Model F4E block 53 Belsimtek was supposed do at some point.

yeah im hoping ED can make time to restart the F4E project that Belsimtek was doing. If anyone remembers It was going to be a block 53, a late life model circa 1980s with ARN101/DMAS modification and ability to mount the Pave Tack targeting pod.

I mean Zeus Does cite a newer documentation..... but the way it seems So with newer software suites in like post 2011? harriers? they dumbed down the features and handicapped things for pilots? dunno why other aircraft dont have these same limitations

for an attack copter would like to see a AH-1W Super Cobra But at the same time albeit utility helicopter roles being niche it would be nice if there was something more modern ( and with better lift capacity) than a UH1H to work with. like something from the UH60 blackhawk family.

Yeah disappointed lack of tad features has no been addressed since a10c 1.0 Not having features that other fighters have is disappointing that it was not addressed in a10c 2.0

Indeed disappointing that no tad updates Bing done because even dcs a10c 1.0 was never complete with TAD features it was supposed to have. And yet for me having a more fleshed out tad was something I was hoping for for dcs a10c 2.0 So yeah somewhat disappointed. Even having pre planned sam threats 8s too much to ask, which is something the f16 and f18 have never minding the fact thet their datalinks show air threats as well.

Indeed the f16 and f18 have pre planned sam threat labels ( datalink threats of a2a contacts aside with link 16.) But sadl should be able to get a2a contacts via a gateway connection. ( ie through a cc aircraft like an e3)

yea im curious why this wont be when Ah64D is supposed to get multiple map modes " Chart Satellite and moving maps via TSD? ( as per wags video) why cant this tech be applied to Hornet, When TAMMAC is supposed have multiple map types? and as other pointed out the other map modes from editor/F10 map would go along ways to replicating this

wags mentions options for 3 map types, Chart map, satellite, and digital moving map..... SO maybe we can get TAMMAC for the F/A18C which has similar additional options too?

Nicholas Cage is a national treasure

yea the new Nightvision/ FLIR rendering engine was supposed to have come with the F/A18's ATFLIR....

what about F14B(U)? supplemental manual Any issues with getting that unclassified too?

i personally have a checklist to have a multirole fighter and not a pure A2A only fighter. Should that be a problem? considering the UK got that capability in 2008, and then it being available to other nations via SRP 4.3 in 2010? Whereas it until all the way until 2017 for the Luftwaffe to have same capability of a TGP and laser guided bombs with newer P1E series software suites in tranche 2 fighters?

Will germany be adopting EF's with Pirate at some point? Or are thse examples just luftwaffe test/evaluation aircraft?

I think the fudging happens in modern aircraft in part also because things become blurred when certain capabilities or features are added or enhanced purely via software updates, and not via physical airframe or avionics modification.

i mean to a certain extent this can true in American aircraft. not just software but certain avionics capabilties that require hardware or equipment replacement, which are not block specific. For example A block 2 series super Hornet Lot 26-27 early in thier service life would still have APG73 radar, but down the line were retrofitted with APG79 AESA radar versus later batches that came out of the factory with them. There would probably be some other features that might make it on but i can't recall would have to look at T.O to see what was retrofitted to older models versus which newer production models. or for example A block 1 Lot 25 Super Hornet would lack APG79 AESA radar even into present day and some other avionics, but otherwise still have more modern software update for sake of commonality minus some additional avionics or hardware changes, depending on the timeframe relative to block 2's.